What does 1 Samuel 15:20 mean?
What is the meaning of 1 Samuel 15:20?

But I did obey the LORD

Saul’s opening words sound confident, yet they reveal a heart already on the defensive.

• Earlier Samuel had confronted him: “Why then did you not obey the voice of the LORD?” (1 Samuel 15:19). Saul’s “but” pushes back against that charge.

• True obedience is measured by God’s standard, not ours (James 1:22). Claiming faithfulness while redefining it is self-deception (1 John 2:4).

• Saul is echoing Israel’s pattern in Judges: “Everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25). By insisting he obeyed, Saul reveals how far his eyes have drifted from God’s clear command (1 Samuel 15:1-3).


I went on the mission that the LORD gave me

Here Saul rehearses the assignment as proof of loyalty.

• Mission language reminds us that God’s call is specific (Genesis 6:22; Acts 26:19). Partial completion is not mission accomplished.

• God had said, “Now go and attack Amalek and devote to destruction all that belongs to them” (1 Samuel 15:3). Saul’s summary omits the word “all,” signaling selectivity.

• Jesus links love to full obedience: “If you love Me, you will keep My commandments” (John 14:15). Saul’s mission talk lacks that love; it centers on his effort, not God’s honor.


I brought back Agag king of Amalek and devoted the Amalekites to destruction

With this admission Saul unwittingly proves his disobedience.

• God’s command was to leave no survivor (1 Samuel 15:3). Sparing Agag contradicts that order.

• The verb “brought back” shows Saul assumed authority to revise God’s plan, much like Uzzah later presumed to steady the ark (2 Samuel 6:6-7). Both acts ended in judgment.

• Keeping Agag alive allowed the symbol of Amalek’s rebellion to linger. Centuries later Haman the Agagite rises against Israel (Esther 3:1), illustrating the long-term cost of unfinished obedience.

• Even Saul’s claim to have “devoted the Amalekites to destruction” is selective; verse 9 records that he and the people spared “the best of the sheep and cattle.” God sees the hidden exceptions (Hebrews 4:13).


summary

1 Samuel 15:20 captures Saul’s self-justification. He frames partial compliance as full obedience, redefining God’s clear command to suit his reputation. The verse warns that doing “most” of what God says while reserving personal preferences is still disobedience. True allegiance submits without editing, trusts God’s wisdom above human reasoning, and obeys completely for His glory.

What historical evidence supports the events described in 1 Samuel 15?
Top of Page
Top of Page