What is the meaning of 2 Chronicles 21:17? So they went to war against Judah, The “they” refers to the Philistines and the Arabs who lived near the Cushites (2 Chron 21:16). God Himself “stirred them up” because King Jehoram had forsaken the covenant ways of his father Jehoshaphat (2 Chron 21:10–13). • 2 Chron 12:2–4 records a similar pattern—when Rehoboam abandoned the LORD, Shishak of Egypt attacked. • Deuteronomy 28:25 warned that if Israel turned from God, “You will go out against your enemies one way but flee seven ways before them.” The attack therefore highlights divine discipline, not mere geopolitical misfortune. invaded it, These enemies crossed borders God had previously secured (2 Chron 17:10, where surrounding nations once “feared the LORD” because of Jehoshaphat). The breach dramatizes the loss of the nation’s protective hedge (Psalm 127:1). • 2 Chron 12:5 shows the prophet Shemaiah telling Rehoboam, “You have abandoned Me; therefore I also have abandoned you to Shishak.” The same principle is at work here. • Jeremiah 5:19 echoes, “As you have forsaken Me… so you will serve foreigners in a land that is not yours.” and carried off all the possessions found in the king’s palace, The royal treasury, painstakingly amassed during Jehoshaphat’s faithful years (2 Chron 17:5), is stripped in a moment. • 2 Chron 12:9—Shishak “took everything, including the treasures of the house of the LORD and of the king’s palace.” History repeats when hearts harden. • Matthew 6:19 reminds us that earthly wealth is vulnerable: “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal.” Jehoram’s spiritual bankruptcy leads to literal bankruptcy. along with his sons and wives; Judgment touches more than gold; it reaches Jehoram’s family. The king who murdered his own brothers (2 Chron 21:4) now tastes similar loss. • Numbers 14:18 affirms that iniquity’s consequences visit subsequent generations. • 1 Samuel 30:3 shows David’s distress when the Amalekites captured his wives and children—yet David sought the LORD, whereas Jehoram did not. Sin’s ripple effect is sobering. not a son was left to him except Jehoahaz, his youngest. Even in chastisement God keeps His covenant promise: “The LORD was not willing to destroy the house of David, because of the covenant He had made with David” (2 Chron 21:7). One heir, Jehoahaz (also called Ahaziah, 2 Kings 8:26), survives to preserve the Messianic line. • 2 Samuel 7:12–16 pledges David an enduring offspring; here that word holds firm. • 2 Chron 22:1 notes that the people made Ahaziah king “because the raiders had killed all the older sons.” Divine mercy threads through severe judgment. summary 2 Chronicles 21:17 recounts God-ordained invaders who crush Jehoram’s kingdom, plunder his wealth, and nearly extinguish his family—yet leave a single surviving son to uphold the Davidic promise. The verse demonstrates God’s faithfulness to discipline rebellion, the certainty of covenant warnings, and the steadfast mercy that preserves a remnant for His redemptive purposes. |
    |