What is the meaning of Acts 25:20? Since I was at a loss as to how to investigate these matters Festus, newly installed as governor, confesses his inability to sort out the religious and political accusations the Jewish leaders are hurling at Paul (Acts 25:7). • He recognizes that the dispute centers on “questions about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who had died, but whom Paul affirmed to be alive” (Acts 25:19). • Like Lysias before him (Acts 23:29; 24:22), Festus sees no clear violation of Roman law. • His admission underscores God’s providence: Roman officials repeatedly declare Paul innocent, preserving the apostle for further witness (Luke 21:12–13; Acts 26:31–32). I asked if he was willing to go to Jerusalem Unable to decipher the theological nuances, Festus proposes a location change, hoping to satisfy the Sanhedrin while retaining Roman oversight. • Jerusalem would placate local leaders (Acts 25:2–3), yet still allow Festus to preside. • By posing the question to Paul, Festus appears fair, honoring Paul’s Roman citizenship (Acts 22:25–29). • God had already promised Paul he would testify in Rome (Acts 23:11), so this offer becomes the moment that propels Paul to claim his right of appeal (Acts 25:11). and be tried there on these charges Festus envisions a formal trial in Jerusalem to clarify the allegations. • The “charges” remain vague—blasphemy, sedition, temple defilement—none proven (Acts 24:13; 25:18). • Paul perceives the hidden plot for his assassination en route (Acts 25:3) and responds decisively: “I appeal to Caesar!” (Acts 25:11). • The governor’s plan collapses, yet God’s plan advances: the gospel will reach Rome under imperial protection (Acts 27:24; 28:30–31). summary Festus’ confession of confusion, his offer of a Jerusalem trial, and Paul’s subsequent appeal reveal a sovereign pattern: earthly courts cannot pin guilt on God’s servant, and every legal twist becomes a highway for the gospel. |
    |