What does Genesis 26:35 mean?
What is the meaning of Genesis 26:35?

And

• The little connective links this verse to the flow of Genesis 26:34, where Esau marries two Hittite women outside the covenant line.

• Scripture often uses “and” to show cause-and-effect. Here it ties Esau’s choices directly to the sorrow that follows, just as Genesis 4:8-9 connects Cain’s act and its fallout.

• The context reminds us that decisions rarely stand alone; they ripple, as Proverbs 13:20 says, “the companion of fools will suffer harm”.


They

• “They” refers to Esau’s wives, Judith and Basemath (Genesis 26:34).

• Their identity matters: they are Canaanites, people the Lord had warned Abraham’s family not to intermarry with (Genesis 24:3; Exodus 34:15-16 later echoes the warning).

• Marrying outside God’s revealed will is never a private matter. Like 1 Kings 11:1-3 records with Solomon, such unions introduce conflicting loyalties and misplaced worship.


Brought grief

• “Grief” conveys bitterness of spirit—a deep, ongoing heartache, not a momentary annoyance. Proverbs 17:25 uses the same idea: “A foolish son brings grief to his father and bitterness to her who bore him”.

• The verb highlights deliberate, sustained pain: the wives’ lifestyles and idols continually wounded Isaac and Rebekah, much like Samson’s Philistine wife vexed his parents (Judges 14:3).

• Grief here is more than emotional; it signals spiritual danger. Deuteronomy 7:3-4 warns that intermarriage will “turn your sons away from following Me,” foreshadowing Israel’s later compromises (Nehemiah 13:23-27).


To Isaac and Rebekah

• Both parents feel the weight. Earlier chapters show them united in seeking a godly spouse for Isaac (Genesis 24), underscoring how foreign Esau’s choice is to their values.

• Parental sorrow over a child’s rebellion is a recurring biblical theme: compare David’s anguish over Absalom (2 Samuel 18:33) and Eli’s sorrow over his sons (1 Samuel 2:22-25).

• The verse implicitly contrasts Esau with Jacob, who will later honor the covenant by marrying within the family line (Genesis 28:1-2).

• God’s promise to bless the nations through this family (Genesis 12:3) remains sure, yet human disobedience complicates the path. Romans 3:3-4 reminds us that human unfaithfulness cannot nullify God’s faithfulness.


summary

Genesis 26:35 captures a family in tension: Esau’s ungodly marriages create ongoing bitterness for his godly parents. The simple clause teaches that choices made outside God’s design—especially in marriage—inflict lasting spiritual and emotional pain on those who love us, yet God’s covenant purposes remain steadfast even through human grief.

What cultural significance do Esau's Hittite wives hold in Genesis 26:34?
Top of Page
Top of Page