What is the meaning of Job 32:3? He burned with anger • The speaker is Elihu, a younger bystander who has listened patiently (Job 32:4). • His “burning” is not a sinful outburst but righteous indignation—a reaction that can be godly when aimed at injustice (Ephesians 4:26; Psalm 4:4; Mark 3:5). • Anger here highlights zeal for truth and fairness; complacency toward error is never commended in Scripture (Proverbs 14:35). Against Job’s three friends • The target is Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar, who had dominated the conversation since Job 4. • They originally came to comfort (Job 2:11) but slid into accusation. • Their role as “friends” carries responsibility: “Faithful are the wounds of a friend” (Proverbs 27:6), yet their wounds were neither faithful nor truthful. Because they had failed to refute Job • Job’s central claim—that he was suffering without hidden sin—stood unchallenged by sound argument (Job 27:5–6). • Scripture values reasoned, evidence-based correction (Deuteronomy 19:15; Proverbs 18:17). • The friends relied on recycled slogans: – “Those who plow iniquity reap trouble” (Job 4:8). – “Surely God does not reject a blameless man” (Job 8:20). – “If you return to the Almighty, you will be restored” (Job 22:23). • Their inability to dismantle Job’s defense exposed the weakness of their theology—that suffering always equals divine punishment (cf. John 9:2–3). And yet had condemned him • Condemnation without proof violates God’s standard of justice (Proverbs 17:15; Isaiah 5:23). • The friends spoke as if they sat in God’s seat (Job 13:4; 19:2), turning consolation into condemnation. • Ultimately, God Himself rebuked them: “You have not spoken the truth about Me as My servant Job has” (Job 42:7). • Elihu’s anger foreshadows God’s verdict, showing that even before the divine whirlwind, the failure of the friends’ arguments was apparent (Job 32:9–10). summary Job 32:3 shows Elihu’s righteous anger because Job’s three friends had offered no solid refutation yet still condemned him. His reaction underscores biblical priorities: truth must precede judgment, anger can be righteous when defending justice, and condemning the innocent is an offense to God. |
    |