What historical events are referenced in Obadiah 1:20 regarding the exiles? Text And Immediate Context Obadiah 1:20 : “And the exiles of this host of the sons of Israel will possess the land of the Canaanites as far as Zarephath, and the exiles of Jerusalem in Sepharad will possess the cities of the Negev.” Obadiah’s single‐chapter oracle targets Edom’s downfall (vv. 10–14) and Israel’s final restoration (vv. 17–21). Verse 20 identifies two distinct groups of deportees and the territories they will one day inherit, thereby anchoring the prophecy in recognizable events of Israelite and Judahite history. The First Group: “The Exiles Of This Host Of The Sons Of Israel” 1. Historical Event. The phrase points to the Assyrian deportations of the Northern Kingdom (Israel) in 734 BC (Tiglath-Pileser III; 2 Kings 15:29), 722 BC (Shalmaneser V/Sargon II; 2 Kings 17:6), and 701 BC (Sennacherib’s sweep of the Shephelah; Isaiah 36–37). Assyrian royal annals enumerate 27,290 captives from Samaria alone, confirming the biblical account. 2. Geographic Re-settlement. Assyrians scattered Israelites to Halah, Habor, and the cities of the Medes (2 Kings 17:6). Obadiah foresees their future repossession of “the land of the Canaanites as far as Zarephath.” Zarephath (modern Sarepta, south of Sidon) has been excavated (James B. Pritchard, 1970s); the site’s eighth-century destruction layer corresponds with Tiglath-Pileser III’s campaign, supporting the chronology. 3. Fulfillment Foreshadowed. Return-era texts (Ezra 2; Nehemiah 7) register northern tribal names such as Manasseh and Ephraim among post-exilic pilgrims, hinting that remnants of those deportations did drift back and settle even into Phoenician border towns (cf. 1 Macc 5:23). The Second Group: “The Exiles Of Jerusalem In Sepharad” 1. Historical Event. Judah fell to Babylon in 597 BC (2 Kings 24:10–16) and finally in 586 BC (2 Kings 25:1-21). Nebuchadnezzar’s policy dispersed Judahites to multiple regions, the best-known being Babylon itself (Psalm 137; Daniel 1). 2. Identity of Sepharad. • Babylonian Theory: A cuneiform text lists Šapardu as a district east of the Tigris; Judean names surface in the Murashu business tablets (Nippur, c. 450 BC). • Lydian (Sardis) Theory: LXX, Midrash, and later Jewish tradition equate Sepharad with Sardis in Asia Minor; the Sardis synagogue (exposed 1962–1974) shows a thriving Jewish community by the late Roman period, indicating an early diaspora presence. • Spanish Theory: Medieval Sepharad = Iberia; though anachronistic for Obadiah’s era, it testifies to an ancient memory of westward exile. 3. Destination of Return. They will “possess the cities of the Negev.” Post-exilic texts describe Judahite reclamation of the southern frontier (Nehemiah 11:25-30). By 401 BC, Elephantine papyri mention Negev settlements cooperating with Judean authorities. Later, during the Hasmonean expansion, John Hyrcanus (129 BC; Josephus, Ant. 13.257-258) subdued Edomite/Idumean towns in the Negev, forcibly circumcising them and returning the land to Jewish control—an unmistakable historical realization of Obadiah’s forecast. The Role Of Edom In The Prophecy Edom abetted both Assyrian and Babylonian campaigns (Psalm 137:7; Lamentations 4:21–22). By predicting Israelite and Judahite repossession of Edomite turf, Obadiah assures divine retribution and covenant faithfulness. Archaeological surveys in the Negev (e.g., Tel Arad Stratum VI; Horvat ‘Uza) display a post-Edomite Judaic material culture by the Persian period, matching the prophetic promise. Chronological Placement Adopting Ussher’s chronology, the Assyrian deportations occur c. 3279 AM (734 BC) and 3286 AM (722 BC). The Babylonian captivity begins 3409 AM (597 BC) and intensifies 3419 AM (586 BC). Cyrus’s decree (Ezra 1:1) in 3468 AM (538 BC) initializes the returns, aligning perfectly with Obadiah’s vision of restored inheritance before the close of the Old Testament period (Malachi c. 397 BC). Prophecy, Partial Fulfillment, And Future Consummation Historically, Assyrian and Babylonian exiles trickled back under Zerubbabel, Ezra, and Nehemiah, reclaiming territories northward to Phoenicia and southward to the Negev. Yet Obadiah 1:21 projects ultimate dominion: “Saviors will ascend Mount Zion to judge the hill country of Edom, and the kingdom will be the LORD’s.” The New Testament identifies Jesus the Messiah as the reigning “King of kings” (Revelation 19:16), and Acts 15:16-18 applies Amos’s parallel restoration prophecy to the inclusion of the Gentiles, suggesting an already/not-yet completion that awaits Christ’s physical return. Theological Implications • Covenant Faithfulness: God’s promise to Abraham (Genesis 15:18) encompasses the territories listed. Obadiah shows that geopolitical upheavals serve divine fidelity. • Divine Justice: Edom’s betrayal precipitates its loss; Israel’s chastening exile yields to eventual triumph. • Messianic Hope: The return lands presage the universal reign of Christ, corroborated by His resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:20) as the pledge of final victory. Summary Obadiah 1:20 references two concrete historical deportations—the Assyrian exile of northern Israel and the Babylonian exile of Judah—and foretells their future repossession of specific regions, a prophecy demonstrably realized by the post-exilic community and advanced in the intertestamental and New Testament eras, with ultimate fulfillment secured in the resurrected Messiah’s kingdom. |
    |