What history shaped Deut. 10:19's command?
What historical context influenced the command in Deuteronomy 10:19?

Text in Focus

“Love the foreigner, therefore, for you were foreigners in the land of Egypt.” (Deuteronomy 10:19)


Immediate Literary Setting (Deuteronomy 10:12-22)

Deuteronomy records Moses’ covenant‐renewal speeches on the plains of Moab shortly before Israel crossed the Jordan (cf. Deuteronomy 1:3; Numbers 33:48-49). Chapter 10 reiterates Yahweh’s past grace (vv. 12-15), recounts the replacement tablets (vv. 1-5), retells the Levitical provision (vv. 6-9), and climaxes with ethics grounded in God’s character (vv. 17-22). Verse 19 forms part of that climax: because Yahweh is “great, mighty, and awesome, who shows no partiality” (v. 17), Israel must mirror His impartial love, especially toward the “ger” (resident alien).


Chronological Placement (ca. 1406 BC)

Bishop Ussher’s dating (Annals, 1650) places the speech in 1452 AM (Anno Mundi) or 1406 BC, forty years after the Exodus (Exodus 12:40; Numbers 14:33-34). This date is compatible with conservative reconstructions of Late Bronze Age I-II archaeology in Transjordan (Kitchen, On the Reliability of the OT, 2003, pp. 187-195).


Sociopolitical Reality of the “Ger”

1. Definition: In Torah, “ger” indicates a non-Israelite who resides permanently or semi-permanently within Israelite jurisdiction (Leviticus 25:35; Numbers 35:15).

2. Demographics: When Israel entered Canaan, mixed‐multitude groups (Exodus 12:38) and displaced Canaanites who submitted (Joshua 9) became “gerim.” Their presence created an ethnically diverse society needing clear covenantal guidelines.

3. Vulnerability: In the patriarchal city-state structure of Late Bronze Canaan, land inheritance cemented identity. Foreigners lacked that inheritance (Leviticus 25:23) and were thus economically exposed.


Contrast with Other Ancient Near Eastern Law Codes

• Code of Hammurabi §§ 38-65 protects economic interests of citizens but is largely silent on permanent aliens.

• Middle Assyrian Laws § 23 allows the enslavement of foreigners captured in war.

• Egyptian New Kingdom texts (Papyrus Anastasi IV) portray “Apiru” laborers as expendable.

Against this backdrop Deuteronomy uniquely legislates proactive affection, not mere non-oppression, for foreigners—reflecting Yahweh’s counter-cultural ethics (Walton, IVP Background Commentary: OT, 2000, pp. 186-188).


Experiential Motivation: Memory of Egyptian Bondage

Israel’s 400-year sojourn (Genesis 15:13; Exodus 12:40, LXX and DSS 4QExod-b) engrained empathy toward outsiders. Egyptian records (Berlin stela 21685) list Semitic captives; Papyrus Leiden I 348 cites corvée quotas for “foreigners.” Moses therefore grounds the command emotionally: “you know the heart of a foreigner” (Exodus 23:9).


Theological Foundation: Yahweh’s Impartial Justice

Deuteronomy 10:17 ties divine attributes to ethics:

• “No partiality”: Divine character transcends ethnicity (2 Chronicles 19:7; Acts 10:34).

• “Justice for the fatherless and widow” (v. 18): The social triad—fatherless, widow, foreigner—recurs throughout the OT (Psalm 146:9; Jeremiah 22:3).

Because the covenant imitates God (Leviticus 19:2), Israel must replicate His universal care.


Integration with Wilderness Provision

For forty years every Israelite lived as a landless sojourner dependent on manna (Exodus 16). This communal memory underlined the lesson: all land ultimately belongs to Yahweh (Leviticus 25:23), so no Israelite possessed ultimate native privilege over a foreigner.


Archaeological Corroboration of a Mixed Community

1. East-Jordanian “collared-rim” pithoi typology (Bimson, BAR 13:2, 1987) evidences a rapid influx of non-Canaanite settlers ca. 1400 BC.

2. Four-room house architecture in the hill country (Shiloh, 1984) shows egalitarian layout devoid of elite quarters, reflecting a society sensitive to marginal classes.


Prophetic and Post-Exilic Continuity

Prophets echo Deuteronomy 10:19:

Zechariah 7:10 warns against oppressing the “ger.”

Malachi 3:5 lists injustice to the “ger” among sins provoking judgment.

Post-exilic reforms under Ezra-Nehemiah (Nehemiah 13:1-3) balanced covenant purity with provision for converting foreigners (Nehemiah 10:28).


Messianic Trajectory and New-Covenant Fulfillment

Christ’s ministry consummates the principle: He heals a Roman centurion’s servant (Matthew 8:5-13) and identifies Himself with strangers (Matthew 25:35). Paul grounds Jew-Gentile unity in the shared identity of once being “strangers to the covenants” (Ephesians 2:12-19), echoing Deuteronomy’s rationale.


Summary

Deuteronomy 10:19 arose within a Late Bronze Age covenant-renewal context, addressing a landless nation poised to settle amid ethnolinguistic diversity. Rooted in Israel’s own foreign oppression, contrasting sharply with contemporaneous law codes, authenticated by robust manuscript evidence, and carried forward by prophets and Christ, the command encapsulates Yahweh’s unchanging call to mirror His impartial, redemptive love toward the outsider.

How does Deuteronomy 10:19 challenge our treatment of immigrants today?
Top of Page
Top of Page