What historical context influenced Paul's message in Romans 1:32? Romans 1:32 “Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things are worthy of death, they not only continue to do these very things, but also approve of those who practice them.” Immediate Literary Context Romans 1:18–32 is Paul’s opening indictment of Gentile humanity. He traces a downward spiral: suppression of general revelation, idolatry, moral inversion, and social decay. Verse 32 is the climactic verdict—people knowingly violate God’s decree and publicly celebrate sin. The historical soil that made such a statement intelligible and urgent is four-fold: (1) the moral climate of the Greco-Roman world, (2) Jewish covenant theology, (3) the philosophical idea of natural law, and (4) the cultural realities of imperial Rome. Greco-Roman Social and Moral Landscape 1. Widespread Idolatry. Rome boasted more than thirty major temples and countless household shrines. Altars to Mithras (Capitoline Museum, inv. 1813) and to Isis (Largo di Torre Argentina excavations) illustrate the pluralism Paul confronted. 2. Sexual License. Frescoes in Pompeii’s House of the Vettii (A.D. 79) depict orgiastic scenes identical to the practices catalogued in Romans 1:24–27. Juvenal’s Satire 2 and Petronius’ Satyricon describe same-sex acts, adultery, and bestial dramatizations as dinner entertainment. 3. Celebrated Violence. “Munera” (gladiatorial games) and infant exposure were applauded; Seneca (De Ira 3.20) notes crowds delighting in bloodsport. This applauding of wrong echoes Paul’s phrase “approve of those who practice them.” 4. Patron-Client Ethic. Power and pleasure were civic virtues; moral scruples were subordinated to honor and status. The approving audience Paul mentions is historically plausible. Roman Legal Attitudes Toward Vice Roman statutes rarely punished consensual immorality unless it threatened the state. The Lex Scantinia (2nd c. B.C.) theoretically penalized homosexual pederasty but was seldom enforced (Cicero, Pro Caelio 31). Divorce was rampant; Augustus’ Lex Julia (18 B.C.) tried to stem adultery but mostly targeted political enemies (Tacitus, Annals 3.24). Thus, Rome institutionalized the very vices Paul lists, and society “approved” them through law or neglect. Idolatry and the Imperial Cult Beginning with Julius Caesar’s deification (42 B.C.) and climaxing under Nero (A.D. 54-68), emperors received divine honors. Altars with the inscription “Nero Caesar, Savior of the World” (Sebasteion at Aphrodisias) exemplify state-sponsored idolatry. Paul writes Romans during Nero’s reign (c. A.D. 56-58); declaring that worshipers “deserve death” subverts the imperial claim that devotion to Caesar brings life. Jewish Perception of Gentile Morality As a Pharisee schooled in Deuteronomy 27–30 and Leviticus 18–20, Paul reads history through covenant lenses. The Torah assigns the death penalty to the sins catalogued in Romans 1 (e.g., Leviticus 20:13, 15-16; Deuteronomy 17:2-5). Jewish writings that circulated in Rome—e.g., Wisdom of Solomon 14 and the Sibylline Oracles—condemned Gentile idolatry and sexual excess in similar language. Paul appropriates this tradition but universalizes guilt: Jews share the same root problem (Romans 2). Philosophical Climate and Natural Law Stoics like Musonius Rufus (Diatribe 12) argued from “phusis” (nature) that certain behaviors violated universal reason. Epicureans denied divine judgment but still acknowledged civic virtue. Paul draws on the accessible concept of “natural revelation” (vv. 19-20) yet roots it in Yahweh’s character. The audience—educated Greeks and Romans—would recognize the allusion, even if they rejected the conclusion. Second Temple Parallels and Qumran Insight The Damascus Document (CD 2.12-16) speaks of Gentiles “walking in the stubbornness of their hearts,” language nearly verbatim to Romans 1:21-24. 1 Enoch 99:7 condemns those who “worship idols and boast of their works of sin.” These texts show that Paul echoed a known Jewish critique while uniquely anchoring it in Christ’s gospel. Archaeological and Epigraphic Corroboration • The Lupanar (brothel) in Pompeii contains graffiti glamorizing every act Paul lists, proving social approval. • A.D. 55 Corinthian inscription honoring Erastus (Romans 16:23) situates Paul amid urban immorality; Corinthian temples to Aphrodite normalized cult prostitution. • Delphi’s narthex inscription (A.D. 52) naming Gallio as proconsul corroborates Acts 18:12-17 and Paul’s exposure to Roman judicial thought—courts that often applauded vice. Paul’s Apostolic Experience Among the Nations Paul ministered in Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth—cosmopolitan hubs where he witnessed normalized depravity and civic approval. Acts 17:16 records his spirit “provoked” by Athens’ idols, furnishing lived evidence for Romans 1:32. This background informs the epistle he pens from Corinth to Rome, the empire’s moral trend-setter. Implications for the Roman Congregation The church in Rome (mixed Jew-Gentile) needed to grasp that: 1. Sin is not ignorance but rebellion against known truth. 2. Society’s applause does not mitigate guilt; it magnifies it. 3. God’s righteous decree (eternal law and Mosaic code) stands over all cultures. 4. The gospel alone rescues both those drowning in celebrated vice (Romans 5:6-11) and those tempted to self-righteous judgment (Romans 2). Summary Romans 1:32 emerges from a matrix of imperial idolatry, legalized immorality, philosophical recognition of natural law, and Jewish covenant theology. Paul, steeped in Scripture and seasoned by missionary exposure to pagan excess, declares that humanity’s deepest problem is willful endorsement of sin—a verdict historically verified by the artifacts, literature, and laws of his day. |
    |