Who is mentioned in Daniel 11:20?
What historical figure is referred to in Daniel 11:20?

Scriptural Text

“Then in his place shall arise one who will send an exactor of tribute for the glory of the kingdom, but within a few days he will be destroyed, yet not in anger or in battle.” — Daniel 11:20


Immediate Literary Setting

Daniel 11:10-19 sketches the reign and fall of Antiochus III (“the Great,” 223-187 BC). Verse 20 plainly introduces his successor: “in his place.” The flow of the passage is chronological and unbroken, moving from Antiochus III (v. 19) to a short-lived monarch characterized chiefly by oppressive taxation and an unviolent death.


Historical Identification

The description matches Seleucus IV Philopator (reigned 187-175 BC), eldest son of Antiochus III. Key correlations:

• He inherited heavy Roman war indemnities after Magnesia (190 BC) and dispatched tax agents empire-wide.

• He famously sent Heliodorus to exact tribute from the Jerusalem temple treasury (2 Maccabees 3:7-30).

• He died suddenly, poisoned by that same minister (Appian, Syriaca 45; Josephus, Ant. 12.4.11). Neither revolt nor battlefield played any role.


Extra-Biblical Corroboration

1. Heliodorus Stele (excavated 2005, Maresha, Israel) bears a 178 BC Seleucid edict naming “Heliodorus, strategos,” verifying his high office under Seleucus IV and the king’s fiscal directives toward Coele-Syria and Judea.

2. Polybius (Hist. 31.3) records Seleucus’ tax emissaries and the unpopularity of his levies.

3. Livy (41.20) chronicles Rome’s monitoring of the indemnity payments levied on Seleucus.

4. Coins struck at Antioch show the epithet “Philopator” and cease abruptly after 175 BC, aligning with the “few days” motif.


Early Jewish & Christian Witness

• 2 Maccabees 3 depicts Heliodorus’ aborted temple plunder, matching Daniel’s “exactor of tribute.”

• Jerome, Commentary on Daniel 11:20, identifies Seleucus IV, noting his death “neither in war nor civil strife but by the treachery of Heliodorus.”

• Theodoret of Cyrus echoes the same conclusion, underscoring the prophecy’s precision.


Chronological Fit with a Young-Earth/Traditional Timeline

Using Ussher’s chronology, Daniel receives this revelation c. 539 BC. Seleucus IV’s reign occurs 364 years later, well inside the predictive horizon and centuries before the Incarnation—ample evidence of genuine foretelling rather than post-event redaction.


Prophetic Precision

1. “Exactor of tribute” (Heb. nogēs hād·ār măl·ḵūṯ): an exact Hebrew term for fiscal oppression, unparalleled among Seleucid kings except Seleucus IV.

2. “Within a few days” employs the idiomim yamim—a short span relative to predecessors; Seleucus’ 12-year reign is the briefest of the early Seleucids.

3. “Not in anger nor in battle” eliminates deaths by coup, insurrection, or combat, leaving assassination or sickness; ancient sources unanimously record poison.


Archaeological & Scientific Relevance

The Heliodorus Stele’s epigraphic formula is dated via paleography and stratigraphy to 178 BC, providing synchronism with the Seleucid era year 134. Such fixed points allow biblical chronologies to dovetail with secular data, reinforcing Scripture’s historical integrity.


Theological Implications

Daniel 11’s micro-accuracy validates the divine authorship of prophecy, underscoring that the same God who foretells Seleucus IV also foretells Messiah’s atoning work (Daniel 9:26). Fulfilled minutiae reinforce confidence in Christ’s resurrection, the linchpin of redemption (1 Corinthians 15:3-4).


Common Objections Addressed

• Late-Date Theory: Dead Sea Scrolls (4QDanc, 2nd century BC) already contain Daniel, demonstrating the book’s existence before Seleucus IV’s demise could be retro-written.

• “Few Days” vs. 12 Years: The phrase is comparative; Antiochus III’s 37-year tenure makes 12 years notably brief.

• Alternative Candidates (e.g., tax collectors under later Roman rule): They fail the immediate-succession requirement (“in his place”) and the non-violent death condition.


Practical Takeaway

The God who precisely guides empires likewise orders personal history. Just as Seleucus IV could not evade divine decree, neither can anyone escape the call to repent and believe the gospel. Trusting the resurrected Christ secures forgiveness and aligns life with the sovereign Author of prophecy.


Answer

The “one who will send an exactor of tribute” in Daniel 11:20 is Seleucus IV Philopator, king of the Seleucid Empire from 187 to 175 BC.

How does Daniel 11:20 encourage trust in God's ultimate plan for history?
Top of Page
Top of Page