Why does 2 Chronicles 36:9 list Jehoiachin's age differently than 2 Kings 24:8? Passage Texts 2 Kings 24:8 – “Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he became king, and he reigned three months in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Nehushta daughter of Elnathan, from Jerusalem.” 2 Chronicles 36:9 – “Jehoiachin was eight years old when he became king, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem. He did evil in the sight of the LORD.” The Apparent Discrepancy At face value the Chronicler records Jehoiachin’s age as eight, while the author of Kings records eighteen. The question is whether this represents a contradiction, a copyist lapse, or two complementary perspectives on the same historical moment. Numerical Notation and Scribal Transmission In first-temple Hebrew two modes of notation existed: full words and alphabetic numerals. Either way, an inadvertent omission of the “-ten” element produced “eight.” This kind of error is precisely the type documented by paleographers and does not impugn inspiration, which applies to the autographic text. Textual criticism simply recovers that original form, demonstrating Scripture’s self-correcting nature through its rich manuscript tradition. Historical and Theological Coherence 1. Marital Status. 2 Kings 24:15 notes that Nebuchadnezzar deported Jehoiachin’s “wives.” An eight-year-old royal child with multiple wives is implausible; an eighteen-year-old prince fits both Near-Eastern custom and biblical precedent (cf. Josiah’s sons taking wives in their teens). 2. Covenant Accountability. The prophetic literature holds kings personally responsible for covenant violations. The adult age in Kings situates Jehoiachin within that moral accountability (Jeremiah 22:24–30). 3. Pattern with Other Kings. Co-regencies and youthful enthronements occur elsewhere (e.g., Joash at seven, 2 Chronicles 24:1). Where an underage king rules, guardians (often priests) are named. In Jehoiachin’s case no regent is mentioned, indicating adult status. The Co-Regency Hypothesis A minority of conservative commentators propose that Jehoiachin was formally associated with his father’s throne at age eight (circa 605 BC), then ruled alone at eighteen after Jehoiakim’s death (597 BC). The Chronicler, writing for the post-exilic community, may have referenced the initial accession age to underscore God’s long-suffering with Judah. Kings, emphasizing the final collapse, records the age at sole reign. Even if the original reading is “eight,” the two figures then complement rather than contradict. Chronological Considerations • Jehoiakim’s reign: 609–598 BC (11 years, 2 Kings 23:36). • Jehoiachin’s exile: March 597 BC (confirmed by Babylonian Chronicle, BM 21946). • If born 616 BC, Jehoiachin would be ~18 in 597 BC. These data align with the eighteen-year figure and the Babylonian records. Archaeological Corroboration • Babylonian Ration Tablets (c. 592–568 BC) list “Ya’u-kînu, king of Judah,” receiving grain and oil rations, matching the biblical Jehoiachin. • The same tablets mention his sons, confirming a family status incompatible with an eight-year-old at the time of exile but perfectly consistent with an eighteen-year-old. Teaching Points for Faith and Practice • Scripture’s harmony endures: text-critical study often resolves alleged contradictions. • God’s sovereignty over history is evident: even kings and empires (Nebuchadnezzar, Jehoiachin) serve His redemptive plan leading to Christ (Matthew 1:11–12). • Believers can approach supposed discrepancies not with anxiety but with rigorous investigation, knowing that “the word of our God stands forever” (Isaiah 40:8). Summary The weight of manuscript evidence, contextual coherence, and archaeological data converge on eighteen as Jehoiachin’s age at his final accession. The figure “eight” in 2 Chronicles 36:9 most plausibly arose from a copyist’s omission or, less likely, reflects an earlier co-regency. Either way, there is no contradiction within Scripture’s unified witness. |
    |