Why does Deuteronomy 20:14 permit taking women and children as plunder? Text Of Deuteronomy 20:14 “However, the women, the children, the livestock, and everything else in the city—all its plunder—you may take for yourself. And you may enjoy the spoil of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.” Immediate Context: Warfare Outside The Promised Land Verses 10–15 distinguish two battle situations. Cities “far away” (v.15) are offered peaceful vassalage; only if they refuse and fight are the men executed (v.13), while non-combatants become Israel’s “plunder” (v.14). By contrast, Canaanite cities under the herem ban (vv.16-18) are to be destroyed outright. Deuteronomy 20:14, therefore, governs warfare beyond Canaan’s borders, not the conquest proper. MEANING OF “PLUNDER” (HEB. shalal) Shalal denotes goods or persons placed under the victor’s legal protection. It never authorizes rape, wanton cruelty, or human trafficking. Mosaic law elsewhere forbids sexual violence (Deuteronomy 22:25-27) and kidnapping for slavery (Deuteronomy 24:7). Thus the verse regulates, rather than encourages, treatment of captives. Protection And Rights For Captive Women Deuteronomy 21:10-14 immediately follows and restricts marriage to a captive woman: • one-month mourning period; • prohibition of sexual relations until marriage; • irrevocable freedom if the husband later sends her away. These stipulations radically exceed any known Ancient Near Eastern (ANE) code in safeguarding female dignity. The Code of Hammurabi (§§128-130) and Assyrian laws, by comparison, sanction instant sexual possession and permanent slavery. Children Spared: An Act Of Restraint In typical ANE warfare, children were often killed to prevent future vengeance (cf. Moabite Stone, line 6; Assyrian annals of Ashurnasirpal II). Scripture’s command to spare them stands as a mercy within its historical setting, anticipating Christ’s ethic of valuing “the least of these” (Matthew 18:5). Social Status Of Captives: From Enemies To Servants & Sojourners Women and children became indentured labor or joined households, but Mosaic law mandated: • Sabbath rest for servants (Exodus 20:10); • equal justice for “sojourners” (Exodus 23:9); • eventual integration (Numbers 15:15-16). Israel’s later history records entire peoples (e.g., Gibeonites, 2 Samuel 21) living under covenantal protection—an outcome envisioned by Deuteronomy 20:14. Theological Rationale: Justice, Mercy, And Covenant Purity God’s primary goal was neither conquest nor plunder but preservation of the redemptive line leading to Messiah (Genesis 12:3; Galatians 3:16). Capital punishment for combatant males removed persistent military threat, while sparing non-combatants displayed divine mercy. The measure is provisional, embedded within a theocracy tasked with safeguarding holiness until Christ’s universal offer of salvation (Ephesians 2:13-16). Progressive Revelation Toward The Gospel Old-covenant war laws are temporal shadows (Hebrews 8:5). Christ later rebukes violent retaliation (Matthew 5:38-45) and welcomes women and children (Mark 10:14). The same canon that records Deuteronomy 20:14 culminates in the cross, where God Himself absorbs enemy hostility, making captives His family (Ephesians 2:19). Archaeological & Comparative Evidence Hittite vassal treaties (ANET §§191–193) and the Amarna letters demonstrate the common ancient practice of enslaving entire populations. Yet Israel’s laws uniquely temper violence and embed ethical restraints unknown in contemporary cultures, as noted by Near Eastern historian K. A. Kitchen (On the Reliability of the Old Testament, p. 165). Philosophical And Ethical Considerations 1. Objective Morality: If a transcendent Lawgiver exists, He alone sets ultimate ethical norms (Romans 9:20-21). 2. Human Sinfulness: Scripture diagnoses universal rebellion (Romans 3:23), explaining the harsh measures necessary for a fallen world. 3. Divine Accommodation: God works within cultural conditions without endorsing every societal structure, progressively steering humanity toward redemption (Acts 17:30-31). Final Synthesis Deuteronomy 20:14 is not divine approval of cruelty but a regulated concession amid a violent epoch, sparing vulnerable lives, integrating them into a covenant community, and preserving the line of redemption culminating in the risen Christ. The verse, when read within its canonical, historical, and theological context, remains fully consistent with the righteous and compassionate character of Yahweh revealed throughout Scripture. |
    |