What is the significance of the two men standing on the riverbanks in Daniel 12:5? Text of the Passage “Then I, Daniel, looked and saw two others standing there, one on this bank of the river and the other on the opposite bank.” (Daniel 12:5) Immediate Literary Setting Daniel 10–12 is a single extended vision that begins beside the Tigris (Daniel 10:4). Chapter 12 is the culmination: Michael’s final deliverance of Israel, the resurrection, and the sealing of the book “until the time of the end.” Verse 5 shifts Daniel from listening to the main angel (commonly identified as Gabriel, cf. 8:16; 9:21) to observing two additional beings who flank the river. Everything that follows—the question, “How long?” (v.6) and the answer, “a time, times, and half a time” (v.7)—is framed by these two figures. Identity of the Two Men 1. Angelic Beings. Each is called “another” (אַחֵרִים) in the Hebrew, the same term earlier used of heavenly messengers (Daniel 10:13,20). Their radiance in v.6 parallels angelic appearance in 10:5–6. 2. Not human prophets. Daniel is the only human present; no OT prophet besides him is ever depicted inside his own vision as a bystander on equal footing with angels. 3. Their function lines up with the “two witnesses” motif elsewhere (Zechariah 4:3,14; Revelation 11:3) rather than with named archangels such as Michael or Gabriel, who already appear in the vision. Legal-Witness Principle Deuteronomy 19:15 requires “two or three witnesses” to confirm any matter. The two figures serve exactly that: they authenticate the oath of the central angel “who was above the waters of the river” (12:7). Daniel’s vision is framed as courtroom testimony: the angel swears “by Him who lives forever” while the two witnesses silently verify. This same legal pattern recurs at Jesus’ transfiguration (Matthew 17:3) and resurrection appearances where “two men” testify (Luke 24:4; Acts 1:10). Symbolism of Opposite Riverbanks The river (likely the Tigris, 10:4) symbolizes a boundary between present exile and future restoration. Placing one angel on each bank portrays sovereignty over both sides of history—pre-Messianic suffering and post-resurrection triumph. In Exodus 14 and Joshua 3 God parted waters to lead His people; here He rules the very span of water separating the two witnesses, underscoring His control over time itself. Angelic Mediation in Daniel Daniel repeatedly learns God’s timetable through angelic conversation (7:15–16; 8:15–19; 9:20–23). In 12:5–7 the two men do not speak to Daniel directly; instead they pose the key question to the central angel. This triangulation elevates the gravity of the answer: the countdown of “1,260 days” (cf. 12:11; Revelation 12:6) is delivered under oath before multiple heavenly beings. Intercanonical Parallels of “Two Men” • Genesis 18:2—two angels with the LORD before Sodom’s judgment. • Zechariah 4—two olive trees/sons of oil beside the golden lampstand. • Matthew 17/Luke 9—Moses and Elijah stand with Christ. • Luke 24; Acts 1—two men in dazzling apparel certify resurrection and ascension. In every case God is about to act decisively, and two witnesses guarantee the certainty of the event. Daniel 12:5 thus foreshadows New Testament scenes where two angelic beings attest to Christ’s resurrection—the ultimate validation of God’s redemptive timeline. Eschatological Clock Confirmed The sworn answer of v.7 (“a time, times, and half a time”) equates to 3½ prophetic years, matching 1,260 days (Revelation 12:6) and 42 months (Revelation 13:5). The dual witnesses certify the duration, anchoring later apocalyptic chronology. Early Christian writers—e.g., Hippolytus, Commentary on Daniel 4.50—cite Daniel 12:5–7 as a literal countdown to Antichrist’s oppression and Messiah’s return, linking Old- and New Testament eschatology. Archaeological and Historical Corroboration The Cyrus Cylinder (539 BC) corroborates the Persian setting of Daniel 10–12 and affirms a policy of Jewish return, matching Daniel 10:1’s timeframe. Excavations at Susa and Opis reveal canal systems consistent with a broad Tigris floodplain, reinforcing the plausibility of Daniel’s riverside vision. Such convergence of text and archaeology strengthens confidence in the narrative’s authenticity, validating the angelic testimony framework of chapter 12. Theological and Christological Fulfillment Daniel 12 culminates in resurrection: “Many who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake” (v.2). The two witnesses of v.5 prefigure two angels at Christ’s empty tomb (John 20:12), anchoring the historical resurrection that forms the bedrock of salvation (1 Corinthians 15:3–4). Just as God authenticated His timetable to Daniel through two heavenly figures, He confirmed Jesus’ triumph over death by two angelic heralds—completion of the prophetic arc begun on the Tigris. Pastoral and Behavioral Implications For believers today the scene underscores certainty amid uncertainty. God provides multiple witnesses—Scripture, history, and personal transformation—to assure His people of the fixed endpoint of suffering and the reality of bodily resurrection. Behaviorally, this promotes resilience and purpose: “those who lead many to righteousness will shine like the stars” (12:3). Ethically, it reinforces integrity; as two witnesses confirm God’s word, so our lives must corroborate our verbal testimony. Conclusion The two men on the riverbanks serve as divinely appointed witnesses who validate the oath concerning the duration of end-time distress and the ensuing resurrection. Their presence draws on the legal standards of Deuteronomy, parallels other pivotal biblical moments, and foreshadows the angelic testimony to Christ’s resurrection. Textual fidelity from Qumran to modern Bibles, archaeological corroboration, and the theological arc from Daniel to the Gospels all converge to demonstrate that the God who authoritatively reveals the future in Daniel 12 is the same God who raised Jesus, guaranteeing both the reliability of Scripture and the sure hope of eternal life. |
    |