Why choose Phoenix over Fair Havens?
Why did the crew prefer "to winter in Phoenix" over Fair Havens in Acts 27:12?

Setting the Scene

Acts 27:8-12 places Paul, a Roman centurion named Julius, the ship’s owner, its pilot, and 273 other souls at Fair Havens on the south coast of Crete. Luke records:

“Because the harbor was unsuitable to winter in, the majority decided to sail on along the coast of Crete to see if they could reach Phoenix, a harbor in Crete facing both southwest and northwest, and spend the winter there.” (Acts 27:12)


Why Fair Havens Was Considered Unsuitable

• Open exposure – Fair Havens lay along an indented shoreline without natural barriers. Winter gales from the northeast and southeast could sweep straight in.

• Limited facilities – Small, locally used anchorage; little room for a large Alexandrian grain ship (v. 6).

• Commercial inconvenience – Few supplies, poor markets, minimal entertainment for a crew stuck several months.

• Time of year – Sailing was already “after the Fast” (Acts 27:9), meaning early October. Winter storms in the Mediterranean were notorious (cf. 2 Corinthians 11:25). Staying demanded maximum shelter.


What Made Phoenix Attractive

• Dual orientation – Luke notes it “facing both southwest and northwest.” This crescent-shaped bay let ships tuck behind a natural promontory whichever wind dominated.

• Better anchorage – Deeper water close to shore, more mooring points, and calmer swells.

• Provisioning hub – As a larger port, Phoenix offered food, repair materials, and lodging for months.

• Reputation among sailors – Mariners knew Phoenix as the safest wintering spot on Crete’s southern coast, only about 40 miles west—an easy hop if weather cooperated.


Comparing the Two Harbors

Fair Havens

• Name sounds inviting, but reality: shallow, exposed, sparsely populated.

• Safe in calm weather, hazardous in winter.

Phoenix

• Natural breakwater, hills shielding from prevailing E-NE winds.

• Bustling port, practical comforts for crew and passengers.


Human Reasoning vs. God’s Warning

• Paul, led by the Spirit and experienced in voyages (2 Corinthians 11:25-26), cautioned, “Men, I can see that our voyage will be filled with disaster and great loss…” (Acts 27:10).

• Yet “the centurion was persuaded by the pilot and the owner of the ship” (v. 11). Majority vote, superior harbor, and economic logic overrode divine insight.

• The decision illustrates Proverbs 14:12—“There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.”


Related Passages

Psalm 107:23-30—God’s sovereignty over the sea, calming storms when sailors cry out.

Jonah 1:4-16—Another crew relying on nautical skill until the Lord intervened.

James 4:13-15—The presumption of planning without acknowledging the Lord’s will.


Takeaway

The crew preferred Phoenix over Fair Havens because of practical maritime concerns—better shelter, supplies, and comfort. Yet their choice, made against Paul’s Spirit-given warning, set the stage for God’s dramatic deliverance and further proved the trustworthiness of His word.

What is the meaning of Acts 27:12?
Top of Page
Top of Page