Why did Amon follow the evil practices of his father in 2 Kings 21:20? Canonical Text “And he did evil in the sight of the LORD, as his father Manasseh had done.” Immediate Literary Context Amon’s brief reign (2 Kings 21:19-26; 2 Chronicles 33:21-25) is narrated directly after the long, infamous reign of Manasseh. Kings summarizes Manasseh almost exclusively by his apostasy; Chronicles adds a late-life repentance after his Assyrian imprisonment. Amon ruled two years, never repented, and was assassinated. The juxtaposition spotlights how formative Manasseh’s earlier wicked decades had been on the heir apparent. Historical Setting: Assyrian Vassalage and Syncretism Manasseh and Amon lived under the shadow of the mighty Neo-Assyrian Empire (cf. Assurbanipal’s Prism B, lines 38-42, listing “Menasê, king of Judah” among vassals). Assyrian policy encouraged local kings to install imperial cult symbols—star, sun-disk, Asherah poles—inside native temples. Archaeologists have recovered eighth–seventh-century cultic artifacts in Judah (e.g., the temple complex at Arad with dual incense altars; a winged-sun-disk seal impression bearing “l ’mn bn mnšh” = “belonging to Amon son of Manasseh”). These finds corroborate the biblical portrait of state-sponsored syncretism during precisely the decades in question. Formative Years: Behavioral and Developmental Considerations 1. Age. Amon was born ca. 642 BC (Manasseh year 30). He was twenty-two when crowned (2 Kings 21:19). Thus he spent his impressionable childhood and adolescence amid the height of Manasseh’s rebellion (idolatrous altars, child sacrifice, occultism; vv. 3-6). 2. Social Learning. Modern behavioral science demonstrates that parental modeling, especially by an admired same-sex parent, powerfully shapes norms (Proverbs 22:6). Scripture affirms this: “The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the teeth of the children are set on edge” (Jeremiah 31:29). 3. Manasseh’s Late Repentance Was Too Late to Re-pattern. Chronicles places Manasseh’s conversion only after an adult Amon had long since internalized his worldview (2 Chronicles 33:12-17). No evidence suggests Amon ever embraced the reformed agenda. Theology of Generational Sin and Personal Responsibility Exodus 20:5-6 and Deuteronomy 5:9-10 speak of iniquity “visiting” subsequent generations “to the third and fourth.” The Hebrew verb פקד (paqad) denotes actualizing consequences, not fatalistic determinism. Ezekiel 18 insists each person answers for personal sin. Amon is therefore culpable; yet the environment he inherited stacked the deck toward evil. Spiritual Dynamics: Idolatry and the Powers Scripture links idols with demonic agency (Deuteronomy 32:17; 1 Corinthians 10:20). When Manasseh flooded Judah with images (2 Kings 21:11), he opened spiritual footholds. Amon “sacrificed to all the idols that his father Manasseh had made and served them” (2 Chronicles 33:22). Demonically energized bondage helps explain why his course seemed almost inevitable apart from divine intervention. Covenantal Momentum toward Judgment The Mosaic covenant (Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28) warned that persistent idolatry would crescendo in exile. By copying Manasseh, Amon accelerated Judah’s march toward 586 BC. His assassination by palace officials (2 Kings 21:23) signaled societal unraveling—fulfilling Yahweh’s word that “I will wipe Jerusalem as one wipes a dish” (21:13). Contrast with Josiah: Providential Purpose Amon’s evil sharpens the dramatic arrival of Josiah, the boy-king who sparks sweeping reform (2 Kings 22–23). Theologically, God sometimes permits darkness to highlight His redemptive breakthroughs. Joseph put it: “You meant evil… but God meant it for good” (Genesis 50:20). Why God Allowed It 1. Respect for Human Freedom: Love coerced is no love (Joshua 24:15). 2. Judicial Hardening: Persistent rejection can provoke divine handing-over (Romans 1:24-28). 3. Redemptive Stage-Setting: Amon’s failure magnified Josiah’s success and preserved the Davidic line ultimately culminating in Messiah (Matthew 1:10). Practical and Pastoral Implications • Parental Influence: Early example imprints deeply; therefore, “bring them up in the discipline and admonition of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4). • Urgency of Prompt Repentance: Delayed repentance minimizes generational impact. • Personal Accountability: Heritage is influential, not determinative; Josiah proves renewal is possible. • Spiritual Warfare: Renounce occult objects and practices decisively (Acts 19:19). Summary Answer Amon followed the evil practices of his father because he was shaped during Manasseh’s decades of rampant idolatry, embraced the sociopolitical incentives of Assyrian-style syncretism, came under the same demonic influences, and personally chose rebellion. Scripture balances generational momentum with individual responsibility, framing Amon’s apostasy as both a predictable sociological outcome and a willful moral failure that advanced God’s larger redemptive storyline. |
    |