Why did Daniel keep praying despite law?
Why did Daniel continue praying despite knowing the decree against it in Daniel 6:10?

Historical Setting And Textual Reliability

Daniel 6 unfolds in the early reign of “Darius the Mede” (Daniel 6:1). Extra-biblical Persian records (e.g., the Nabonidus Chronicle, Persepolis Administrative Tablets, and the Cyrus Cylinder) confirm the satrapal system, the irrevocability of royal edicts, and the rapid transition from Babylonian to Medo-Persian rule exactly as Daniel describes. Hebrew and Aramaic fragments of Daniel (4QDan^a, 4QDan^b, 4QDan^c) from Qumran, dated c. 150–125 BC, show the account already circulating verbatim centuries before the New Testament era, verifying its authenticity and preserving the very wording of Daniel 6:10.


The Edict That Forced A Choice

The counselors persuaded Darius to sign a thirty-day injunction that “whoever petitions any god or man except you, O king, will be thrown into the den of lions” (Daniel 6:7). Because Persian decrees were irrevocable once sealed (Daniel 6:8, 12, 15), Daniel understood immediate, lethal consequences.


Daniel’S Pre-Existing Habit Of Prayer

“Just as he had done before” (Daniel 6:10) shows prayer was not an impulsive protest but a lifelong discipline. Psalm 55:17—“Evening, morning, and noon, I cry out”—reflects the thrice-daily pattern that Second-Temple Jews later formalized (cf. Acts 3:1). Facing Jerusalem satisfied Solomon’s temple-dedication plea: “If they pray toward this place … then hear from heaven” (1 Kings 8:44-49). Daniel’s behavior therefore flowed from covenant obedience, not civil rebellion.


Exclusive Allegiance To Yahweh

The First Commandment (“You shall have no other gods before Me,” Exodus 20:3) left Daniel no moral option but to continue praying. He had earlier refused Babylonian food laws (Daniel 1) and idolatrous homage (Daniel 2:20–23). His life theme was already settled: loyalty to the God who revealed Himself as “I AM” (Exodus 3:14) exceeds loyalty to any empire (cf. Matthew 4:10; Acts 5:29).


Covenant Confidence And Prophecy

Daniel knew Jeremiah’s 70-year exile prophecy (Jeremiah 29:10; Daniel 9:2). Prayer toward Jerusalem was an act of faith that God’s redemptive plan was on schedule. Gratitude (“gave thanks,” Daniel 6:10) in the face of death makes sense only if one believes Yahweh’s sovereignty is unthreatened by human decrees (Daniel 4:34-35).


Biblical Model Of Civil Disobedience

Daniel stands in a line with the Hebrew midwives (Exodus 1), Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego (Daniel 3), the apostles (Acts 4–5), and the Revelation martyrs (Revelation 12:11). Scripture consistently affirms submission to government (Romans 13:1) until it commands what God forbids or forbids what God commands. At that point, allegiance to God prevails.


Evangelistic Impact Of Faithful Obedience

Daniel’s deliverance led Darius to proclaim: “He is the living God … His kingdom will never be destroyed” (Daniel 6:26). Miraculous rescue served apologetic purposes, foreshadowing the ultimate apologetic: Jesus’ resurrection (Matthew 12:40; 1 Corinthians 15:4). Historically attested martyr-resilience—from Rome’s catacombs to modern persecuted churches—continues to draw skeptics to investigate the faith Daniel exemplified.


Typological Pointer To Christ

Daniel, an innocent statesman condemned by jealous rivals, thrown into a pit sealed with a stone and governmental seal (Daniel 6:17), emerges alive at dawn—anticipating the greater Son of Man, likewise innocent, entombed, sealed, and vindicated by resurrection (Matthew 27:62-66; 28:1–6). The parallel magnifies Christ’s victory and endorses the Old Testament’s unified messianic trajectory.


Archaeological Confirmations Of Daniel’S Era

• Lion-pit reliefs at Persepolis depict live lions kept for royal sport, matching Daniel 6.

• The “Gubaru/Gaubarūva” tablets mention a governor installed by Cyrus over Babylon, paralleling Darius the Mede.

• The “Prayer of Nabonidus” among the Dead Sea Scrolls recounts a Babylonian king struck and restored after divine judgment, echoing themes in Daniel 4, bolstering Daniel’s cultural authenticity.


Practical Applications For Believers Today

1. Cultivate habitual, disciplined prayer; crisis obedience grows from peacetime practice.

2. Honor civil authorities yet reserve ultimate obedience for God; discernment requires Scriptural saturation.

3. Face present “lions” with thanksgiving, trusting divine sovereignty.

4. Use deliverance testimonies evangelistically, pointing to the risen Christ.

5. Teach children that courageous faith is historically and evidentially grounded, not blind leap.


Conclusion

Daniel persisted in prayer because covenant fidelity, settled habit, and unshakable confidence in Yahweh outweighed any temporal threat. His action was theologically necessary, morally obligatory, historically credible, and apologetically powerful—showing that obedience to the living God is always the wisest course, even when the lions roar.

How does Daniel's example encourage you to prioritize God over societal pressures?
Top of Page
Top of Page