Why did David take more concubines and wives in 2 Samuel 5:13? DAVID’S ADDITION OF CONCUBINES AND WIVES (2 Samuel 5:13) Canonical Text “And David took more concubines and wives from Jerusalem after he came from Hebron, and more sons and daughters were born to him.” (2 Samuel 5:13) Definition of Terms • Wife (’ishshah): covenantal partner with full legal status. • Concubine (pilegesh): secondary wife of lower rank, afforded protection and inheritance rights for children but not the same dowry or political standing. Immediate Literary Context 2 Samuel 5 narrates David’s consolidation of the united monarchy. Verses 1-5 record his anointing in Jerusalem; verses 6-12 recount conquest of the Jebusite stronghold and establishment of his palace; verse 13 notes the expansion of his household; verses 17-25 describe military victories over the Philistines. The verse is therefore embedded between political stabilization and military triumph, signaling royal maturation. Cultural-Historical Background 1. Near-Eastern Monarchic Norms: Royal polygamy was ubiquitous (cf. Amarna Letters, ANET 483-490). Marriage forged alliances, secured loyalty of tribal chieftains, and displayed kingly prosperity. 2. Hebron Period Precedent: 2 Samuel 3:2-5 already lists six sons from six wives; 1 Chronicles 14:3 parallels 2 Samuel 5:13, attesting textual consistency. 3. Legal Status under Mosaic Law: While Genesis 2:24 gives the monogamous ideal, Old-Covenant legislation regulated rather than abolished polygamy (e.g., Exodus 21:10-11; Deuteronomy 21:15-17), reflecting incremental revelation. Political Realities and Royal Succession • Unification Strategy: By marrying women from influential families within Judah and the northern tribes, David cemented internal solidarity after years of civil discord following Saul’s death. • Dynastic Security: Multiple heirs reduced the risk of extinction of the royal line in a high-mortality era; yet Scripture honestly records the familial turbulence that ensued (Amnon, Absalom, Adonijah). • International Diplomacy: Royal wives from neighboring peoples (e.g., Maacah, daughter of Talmai, king of Geshur) forged buffer alliances on Israel’s borders. Theological Considerations 1. Divine Toleration, Not Endorsement: Deuteronomy 17:17 explicitly warns Israel’s kings: “He must not multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away.” David’s partial compliance contrasts sharply with Solomon’s later excess (1 Kings 11:1-4). The narrative is descriptive, revealing David’s humanity, not prescriptive for believers. 2. Covenantal Progression: Progressive revelation culminates in Christ’s affirmation of Edenic monogamy (Matthew 19:4-6). The Old Testament’s candid record of flawed heroes underscores the need for the sinless Messiah. 3. Providence in Messianic Lineage: Bathsheba, initially taken as a result of sin, becomes mother of Solomon, ancestor of the incarnate Christ (Matthew 1:6). God’s redemptive plan overrides human imperfection. Ethical and Behavioral Lessons • Sin’s Compound Consequences: Domestic strife, sexual violence, rebellion, and political instability flowed from David’s enlarged harem (2 Samuel 13-18). • The Heart Issue: Multiple wives diverted David’s affections; Nathan’s rebuke (2 Samuel 12:7-12) links marital excess to moral vulnerability. • Leadership Warning: Authority does not exempt God’s people from divine standards; rather, “to whom much is given, much will be required” (Luke 12:48). Comparative Passages • Genesis 2:24 — monogamous creational ideal. • 1 Samuel 1:2; 2 Samuel 12:8 — prevalence and divine accommodation of polygamy. • Nehemiah 13:26 — Solomon’s wives as cautionary precedent. • 1 Timothy 3:2, 12 — monogamy requisite for church leadership under the New Covenant. Practical Application Believers today extract timeless principles: God’s blessings must not be presumed as license; leadership demands restraint; marital faithfulness reflects Christ’s covenant love for the Church (Ephesians 5:25-32). Conclusion David’s additional concubines and wives in 2 Samuel 5:13 arose from cultural norms, political exigencies, and dynastic considerations, tolerated within but never idealized by Old-Covenant revelation. Scripture’s honest portrayal, its embedded moral critique, and its role in advancing redemptive history together clarify why the event is recorded without contradiction to the Bible’s overarching call to covenantal monogamy fulfilled in Christ. |
    |