Why did Elkanah have two wives in 1 Samuel 1:2? I. Biblical Text “He had two wives: the name of one was Hannah and the name of the other Peninnah. Peninnah had children, but Hannah had none.” (1 Samuel 1:2) Ii. Old-Covenant Cultural Background Polygynous unions appear throughout the patriarchal and tribal period (e.g., Genesis 4:19; 16:3; 29:30; Judges 8:30). In the Ancient Near East a man’s legacy, land tenure, and clan security depended on male offspring. Cuneiform marriage contracts from Nuzi (15th century BC) stipulate that if the primary wife is barren after a set term, the husband may take a secondary wife so “his name will not be cut off.” The same social pressure existed in Iron-Age Israel, as confirmed by family-tomb inscriptions recovered at Khirbet el-Qom and Tel Arad that repeatedly petition Yahweh for “seed.” Iii. Divine Ideal Vs. Human Concession Scripture’s first marriage pattern is monogamy (Genesis 2:24). Mosaic Law never commands polygamy; it regulates it to restrain harm (Exodus 21:10; Deuteronomy 21:15-17). Christ later re-affirms the Edenic norm (Matthew 19:4-6). Thus Elkanah’s two wives are descriptive of a fallen culture, not prescriptive ethics. The narrative itself exposes polygamy’s pain—rivalry, jealousy, and anguish—thereby reinforcing the original ideal. Iv. Infertility As An Immediate Cause Hannah’s barrenness is repeatedly stressed (1 Samuel 1:2, 5, 6). In a subsistence agrarian economy, childlessness threatened economic survival and covenant promises tied to progeny (Genesis 12:7; 15:5). Elkanah’s second marriage likely arose after years of hoping with Hannah, then seeking heirs through Peninnah. Similar etiological patterns occur with Abraham–Sarah–Hagar and Jacob–Leah–Rachel–Bilhah–Zilpah. V. Lexical And Narrative Purpose Hebrew syntax places Hannah first (“Hannah and Peninnah”) contrary to the birth-order expectation, signaling the author’s theological focus on Hannah’s eventual exaltation. The rivalry motif heightens the miracle of Samuel’s birth, showcasing Yahweh as the life-giver who “closes” and “opens” wombs (1 Samuel 1:5-6; cf. Genesis 30:22). Vi. Sovereignty And Redemptive Trajectory God permits—but does not endorse—Elkanah’s polygyny to stage a greater redemptive act: the birth of Samuel, the last judge and inaugural prophet-kingmaker. This aligns with Genesis 50:20, where God overrules human shortcomings for covenantal advance, ultimately culminating in Christ’s resurrection (Acts 13:32-33). Vii. Ethical Clarification For Modern Readers New Testament teaching, sealed by Christ’s authority and modeled in apostolic qualifications (1 Timothy 3:2; Titus 1:6), re-establishes lifelong monogamy as the normative Christian ethic. Polygamy’s presence in earlier epochs is a tolerated irregularity, not a timeless moral blueprint. Viii. Manuscript Reliability Of 1 Samuel The Masoretic Text (c. AD 1000) agrees substantially with 4QSamᵃ (c. 2nd century BC) on 1 Samuel 1, demonstrating textual stability across a millennium. Septuagint readings corroborate the core content. These lines of transmission, verified through comparative palaeography and computerized collation, affirm that modern Bibles present what the original author wrote. Ix. Archaeological And Historical Corroboration • Shiloh Excavations: Cultic installations and Iron-Age I pottery corroborate 1 Samuel’s setting at Shiloh where Elkanah worshiped yearly (1 Samuel 1:3). • Bullae bearing theophoric elements “—yahu” from the same period show common Yahwistic devotion in Ephraimite territories, matching Elkanah’s lineage (1 Samuel 1:1). • Tel Dan and Mesha stelae confirm a monarchic line stemming from David, whom Samuel anoints, anchoring the narrative in verifiable history. X. Apologetical Implications The account’s candor about polygamy argues for authenticity; fabricated hagiography would hide patriarchal flaws. The consistency between legal concessions, prophetic critique (Malachi 2:14-16), and Christ’s fulfillment underscores a unified biblical message—intriguingly preserved despite diverse authors, eras, and genres, a mark of divine superintendence. Xi. Practical Theology Elkanah’s situation reminds contemporary readers that cultural pressures can tempt deviation from God’s design, yet the Lord works redemptively through imperfect choices. Believers are called to trust His timing, as Hannah did, pouring out her soul rather than embracing expedient solutions. Xii. Summary Answer Elkanah married Peninnah because Hannah was barren and societal inheritance customs prized children; polygyny was a tolerated but inferior arrangement within Old-Covenant culture. The narrative uses this reality to highlight God’s sovereignty, the futility of human stratagems, and the supremacy of His redemptive plan, ultimately directing attention to the Messiah who restores the original marital ideal and offers eternal salvation. |
    |