Why did Paul say he "robbed other churches" in 2 Corinthians 11:8? Text of 2 Corinthians 11:8 “I robbed other churches by accepting their support in order to serve you.” Original Language and Semantic Range The verb Paul chooses is ἐσύλησα (syleō), literally “to plunder, despoil, strip.” In secular Greek it is used of soldiers carrying off spoils. Paul borrows the fiercest possible word to jolt his readers; yet no theft occurred. The word functions rhetorically—an intentional overstatement that heightens contrast between his self-sacrifice and the super-apostles’ profiteering (11:5-7, 20). Immediate Literary Context Chapters 10–12 form Paul’s “boasting” section, a defense of his apostleship against intruders who flaunted credentials and demanded payment. Paul repeatedly reminds Corinth that he preached “free of charge” (11:7), refused to be “a burden” (11:9), and sought “not yours but you” (12:14). “Robbed” thus dramatizes the one-sided financial arrangement he engineered for their sake. Broader Pauline Practice of Financial Support 1 Corinthians 9:6-15, Philippians 4:10-19, 1 Thessalonians 2:9, and Acts 20:33-35 reveal a consistent pattern: • Paul affirms the right of ministers to receive pay (1 Corinthians 9:14) yet often waives that right where it might hinder the gospel. • He accepts gifts from willing partners—especially the Macedonians (Philippians 4:15-16; 2 Corinthians 8:1-5)—but declines funds from congregations whose motives are suspect. • He supplements income by tentmaking (Acts 18:3; 20:34), modelling industriousness (2 Thessalonians 3:8-9). Historical and Cultural Background: Patronage vs. Gospel Integrity Greco-Roman traveling orators commonly charged lecture fees and courted wealthy patrons. Accepting money implanted social obligations; your benefactor could call in favors. Corinthian society thrived on such reciprocity (confirmed by city-center dedicatory inscriptions and the famous Erastus pavement, CIL I² 2666). Paul forestalls any claim that his message is another commodity by declining Corinthian patronage altogether, while still permitting distant congregations to underwrite the mission. Support from the Macedonian Churches When Paul first reached Corinth (A.D. 50-51), Silas and Timothy arrived from Macedonia “bringing supplies” (2 Corinthians 11:9; cf. Acts 18:5, textual correlation in P⁴⁶ c. A.D. 200). Philippi, Thessalonica, and Berea repeatedly sent aid (Philippians 4:15-16), despite their “extreme poverty” (2 Corinthians 8:2). By calling this gracious generosity “robbery,” Paul credits them with a sacrificial loss incurred so the affluent Corinthians could receive the gospel gratis. Paul’s Tentmaking and Refusal of Corinthian Money Working leather and canvas in the commercial district of Corinth’s Lower Forum (archaeologically documented shophouses along the Lechaion Road), Paul supported himself and his team. He underscores the personal cost: night shifts at the lathe, preaching by day (Acts 18:4; 1 Thessalonians 2:9). This self-denial exposes the mercenary motives of the intruders (11:20). Theological Motive: Protecting the Gospel from Charges of Commercialism Paul’s concern is soteriological, not financial. If any suspect he peddles God’s word, the scandal of Christ (1 Corinthians 1:23) is eclipsed by cynicism. Therefore “we put no obstacle in anyone’s way” (2 Corinthians 6:3). His procedure harmonizes with Jesus’ mandate, “Freely you have received; freely give” (Matthew 10:8), and safeguards the central claim—the crucified and risen Lord, not human patronage, is the source of salvation. Rhetorical Device: Hyperbole That Exposes Corinthian Ingratitude Calling their free ride “robbery” is a piercing irony. It simultaneously rebukes Corinth for complacency and honors the Macedonians’ love. Classical rhetoric labels such intensification an auxēsis. Paul’s Jewish background also favors prophetic hyperbole (cf. Micah 6:7). No contradiction with the Eighth Commandment exists; the language is figurative, not confessional. Consistency with Old Testament Ethics Scripture allows priests and Levites to live from temple offerings (Numbers 18:8-24) yet applauds voluntary forfeiture for a higher good (Nehemiah 5:14-18). Paul stands in that line: he may claim maintenance, but waives it to magnify grace. Far from breaching Torah, his action exemplifies it. Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration • The Erastus inscription (mid-1st century) corroborates a social milieu where benefactors sought public honor through gifts—exactly the dynamic Paul rejects. • Papyri from Oxyrhynchus (e.g., P.Oxy. 1905) show itinerant teachers stipulating lecture fees, matching Paul’s polemical backdrop. • Philippian civic records (vide the Via Egnatia excavations) testify to limited resources, amplifying their sacrificial giving praised in 2 Corinthians 8–9. Practical and Behavioral Implications for Believers 1. Gospel workers may receive support, yet must never market the message. 2. Wealthy congregations ought to recognize and relieve the burdens borne by others on their behalf. 3. Hyperbolic self-depiction can serve pastoral ends when truthfully employed. 4. True spiritual authority is validated by service, not honoraria. Conclusion Paul “robbed” other churches only in the sense that their lavish generosity enabled him to minister to Corinth without charge. The arresting metaphor exposes Corinthian selfishness, protects the gospel from commercial suspicion, and extols the Macedonian model of grace-filled giving. Far from confessing actual theft, Paul illustrates Christlike self-emptying, inviting every generation to value the advance of the resurrection message above personal gain. |
    |