Why does Eliphaz criticize Job's words in Job 15:2? Immediate Literary Context Eliphaz’ second speech (Job 15) follows Job’s extended defense (Job 12–14) in which Job maintains his innocence and questions God’s treatment of him. Eliphaz responds by challenging both the content and the tone of Job’s words. Verse 2 opens the rebuke: “Should a wise man answer with empty notions or fill his belly with the hot east wind?” . Eliphaz’ Concept of Wisdom In the Ancient Near Eastern worldview, a “wise man” (ḥākām) spoke words rooted in reverence for God and the traditional doctrine of retribution: righteousness brings blessing, sin brings calamity (Proverbs 10:30; Deuteronomy 28). Job’s insistence on his blamelessness and his interrogation of divine justice invert that orthodoxy. To Eliphaz, this inversion cannot be wisdom; therefore Job’s speech must be folly. Theological Grievance Behind the Critique Job has just suggested that God destroys both blameless and wicked alike (Job 12:6, 10; 13:24) and that God may even be prosecuting him unjustly (13:27). For Eliphaz—committed to a strict retribution theology—such assertions verge on blasphemy. His censure is thus moral and theological, not merely rhetorical. Rhetorical Devices Employed a. Irony: Calling Job a “wise man” while implying the opposite. b. Hyperbole: “Fill his belly with the hot east wind” depicts words as so voluminous that they become self-consuming. c. Metaphor: Wind imagery underscores both emptiness and harm; the east wind snaps ships (Psalm 48:7) and withers vegetation (Jonah 4:8). Contrast with Job’s Self-Assessment Job has claimed, “I have understanding as well as you” (Job 12:3). Eliphaz counters that claim by labeling Job’s “understanding” mere wind. The clash is between experiential innocence (Job) and traditional dogma (Eliphaz). Continuity with Eliphaz’ First Speech In Job 4–5 Eliphaz urged Job to repent because “those who plow iniquity… reap it” (4:8). Job’s refusal to accept guilt forces Eliphaz, in chapter 15, to intensify the accusation: Job’s words are not only misguided but irreverent. Progression of Accusation Verse 5—“Your iniquity teaches your mouth”—shows Eliphaz moving from critiquing words (v. 2) to indicting character (vv. 5–6). In Eliphaz’ view, empty words evidence hidden sin. Broader Canonical Parallels a. Ecclesiastes contrasts “the voice of a fool” with wise speech (Ecclesiastes 5:3). b. Jesus warns of “idle words” (Matthew 12:36). Eliphaz’ complaint anticipates this biblical theme: words reveal heart condition (Proverbs 18:21). Cultural Background: The East Wind Phenomenon The Levantine sirocco can raise temperatures above 100 °F, desiccating crops within hours. Ancient hearers instantly grasped the deadly force behind Eliphaz’ metaphor, heightening the severity of his rebuke. Practical and Pastoral Implications Believers are cautioned to test counsel against Scripture. Eliphaz correctly values reverence yet misapplies retribution theology, illustrating that orthodox language can mask misjudgment (cf. John 9). The episode encourages humility when interpreting another’s suffering. Foreshadowing Christ’s Role as True Wisdom Job anticipates a Mediator (Job 16:19; 19:25). Eliphaz’ failure to comfort contrasts with Christ, the Logos, whose words are “spirit and life” (John 6:63). Where Eliphaz accuses, Christ intercedes. Summary Answer Eliphaz criticizes Job’s words in Job 15:2 because, from his commitment to a retributive wisdom tradition, Job’s protestations sound like empty, irreverent, and dangerous rhetoric—likened to a scorching desert wind that offers no sustenance, contradicts God’s justice, and therefore cannot originate from a truly wise man. |
    |