Why does God choose delusions in Isa 66:4?
Why does Isaiah 66:4 depict God choosing delusions for those who reject Him?

Canonical Text and Translation

Isaiah 66:4 : “so I will choose their punishments and bring on them what they dread. For when I called, no one answered, when I spoke, they did not listen; they did evil in My sight and chose that in which I do not delight.”

Older manuscripts (e.g., the Great Isaiah Scroll, 1QIsᵃ) preserve the Hebrew verb אֶבְחַר (’eḇḥar, “I will choose”) paired with תַּעֲלוּלֵיהֶם (ta‘aluleyhem, “their mockeries/delusions”). Hence some traditional English renderings: “I also will choose their delusions” (KJV). The Berean translation clarifies the sense—God selects the very retributions and self-deceptions that the rebels will experience.


Historical Setting

Isaiah 56–66 addresses post-exilic worshipers tempted to repeat the sins that led to exile. Archaeological strata at the rebuilt Second Temple platform confirm a smaller, economically stressed community (cf. Ezra 3:12–13). The prophet warns that nominal religion without obedience invites the same fate their forefathers endured.


Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom

1. Human initiative: “they did evil… chose that in which I do not delight.”

2. Divine response: “I will choose…” The construction mirrors the lex talionis principle: people pick sin; God picks the fitting consequence (Proverbs 1:29–31).

3. Philosophical coherence: allowing creatures genuine choice while reserving the prerogative to set the outcome sustains moral agency and ultimate sovereignty simultaneously.


The Motif of Judicial Hardening

Scripture frequently describes God handing people over to the trajectory they themselves initiate.

• Pharaoh (Exodus 9:12)

• Ahab receiving a “lying spirit” (1 Kings 22:19-23)

• Israel in the wilderness (Psalm 81:11-12)

• Nations in the gospel era (Romans 1:24-28)

• Eschatological rebels (2 Thessalonians 2:9-12: “God will send them a powerful delusion”).

Isaiah 66:4 stands as a paradigmatic Old Testament statement of this principle.


Moral Logic Behind the Delusion

1. Retributive Justice—Sin merits proportionate recompense (Jeremiah 17:10).

2. Revelatory Purpose—Exposing the emptiness of idols highlights God’s glory (Isaiah 44:9-20).

3. Redemptive Aim—Painful consequences can drive repentant return (Hosea 2:6-7).

4. Cosmic Testimony—Angelic beings witness God’s righteousness (Job 1–2; Ephesians 3:10).


Illustrations from Biblical Narrative

• In Numbers 11 the craving for meat results in “quail plague”; God chooses the very object of lust as the instrument of judgment.

• In 1 Samuel 8 Israel’s demand for a king yields the oppressive monarchy they feared.

• In Acts 5 Ananias and Sapphira’s deception turns lethal, purging the infant church.


Modern Corollaries

Naturalistic materialism, for all its technological fruits, cannot ground objective morality or human dignity. Yet cultures that reject the Creator often double down on this worldview—an echo of Isaiah’s ta‘alul. The intellectual idols of our age become the very instruments of cultural disintegration (cf. Psalm 115:8—“Those who make them become like them”).


Systematic-Theological Integration

• Hamartiology: Sin blinds (2 Corinthians 4:4).

• Theology Proper: God is light; rejection of light necessitates darkness (1 John 1:5–6).

• Soteriology: Christ’s resurrection delivers from both guilt and delusion (1 Peter 1:3).

• Eschatology: Final judgment includes global delusion for those who “refused to love the truth” (2 Thessalonians 2:10).


Pastoral Implications

1. Urgency of Response—Delayed obedience risks hardened perception.

2. Discernment—Believers must test spirits and ideologies against Scripture (1 John 4:1).

3. Evangelism—Expose idols, present risen Christ as the Truth who liberates from deception (John 8:32).


Conclusion

Isaiah 66:4 shows a God who, after patient calling, selects fitting delusions for the unrepentant. This is not arbitrary malice; it is a measured, moral, revelatory, and redemptive act. The verse stands as both warning and invitation: listen while He speaks, lest the chosen delusion become one’s final reality.

How can we discern God's voice to avoid 'what I did not delight in'?
Top of Page
Top of Page