Why is 1 Chronicles 2:40 important?
What is the significance of the genealogy listed in 1 Chronicles 2:40?

Text of 1 Chronicles 2:40

“Eleasah was the father of Sismai, Sismai the father of Shallum.”


Immediate Genealogical Context: Sheshan’s Line

Verses 34–41 trace the family of Sheshan, a descendant of Jerahmeel (firstborn of Hezron of the tribe of Judah). Sheshan had no sons, so he gave his daughter to his Egyptian servant Jarha (v 34–35). Their line then proceeds: Jarha → Attai → Nathan → Zabad → Ephlal → Obed → Jehu → Azariah → Helez → Eleasah → Sismai → Shallum → Jekamiah → Elishama. Verse 40 sits almost at the end of this 13-generation list.


Historical and Cultural Background

1 Chronicles was compiled after the Babylonian exile (late 6th–5th century BC) from temple archives and royal records (cf. 1 Chronicles 9:1). Genealogies served legal functions: proving tribal identity, land claims (Numbers 26:52-56), and eligibility for temple or civic service (Ezra 2:59-63). Listing Sheshan’s descendants assured later generations that Judah still possessed meticulous records even for a minor branch.


Purpose within the Chronicler’s Larger Genealogies (1 Ch 1–9)

1. Re-establish Judah’s continuity from Creation to the returning exiles.

2. Underscore God’s covenant with the house of David by embedding the broader family of Judah.

3. Demonstrate divine preservation despite exile and intermarriage (e.g., Sheshan’s Egyptian son-in-law).

4. Reinforce community structure as families resettled ancestral lands around Bethlehem, Hebron, and Jabez (cf. 1 Chronicles 2:24, 55).


Legal and Inheritance Implications

Under Mosaic Law property passed through male heirs (Numbers 27:8-11). Sheshan’s lack of sons created a legal dilemma. By marrying his daughter to Jarha he kept the estate within the household while absorbing a Gentile. The Chronicler records this to validate the descendants’ right to Judahite land centuries later. Verse 40’s Eleasah-Sismai-Shallum triad functions like a title deed, showing uninterrupted succession.


Inclusion of Gentiles and Foreshadowing of the Gospel

Jarha’s entrance mirrors Rahab (Joshua 6) and Ruth (Ruth 4). It signals God’s intention to bless the nations through Judah. The genealogy quietly anticipates the Messiah’s offer of salvation to Jew and Gentile alike (Isaiah 49:6; Romans 3:29). Sheshan’s line becomes an early illustration of Ephesians 2:14—Christ “has made both one.”


Covenantal Faithfulness and Theological Significance

• Preservation: The unbroken list culminating in Elishama (“My God hears”) highlights Yahweh’s faithfulness to the tribe through obscurity and foreign infiltration.

• Names: Eleasah (“God has made”), Sismai (“Yah sustains”), Shallum (“recompense/peace”)—together proclaim that God actively makes, sustains, and brings peace.

• Typology: Eleasah recalls Eleazar, son of Aaron, linking priestly overtones; Shallum prefigures “Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6).


Practical Implications for Believers Today

1. God values individuals history barely remembers; He numbers every generation and secures His purposes through them.

2. No barrier—ethnic, social, or occupational—prevents inclusion in God’s redemptive line when faith and covenant obedience are present.

3. The meticulous record invites confidence in Scripture’s trustworthiness; the same care that preserved Eleasah’s name also preserves the gospel accounts of Christ’s resurrection (1 Colossians 15:3-8).

4. Believers are stewards of their own spiritual heritage, called to hand a faithful testimony to future generations (Psalm 78:5-7).


Conclusion

1 Chronicles 2:40, though a single verse, anchors a chain that illustrates legal continuity, divine faithfulness, Gentile inclusion, and textual reliability. Through Eleasah, Sismai, and Shallum, God proclaims that He makes, sustains, and brings peace—signposts ultimately fulfilled in the resurrected Christ, the true heir of Judah and Savior for all who believe.

How can we apply the importance of heritage in our Christian walk today?
Top of Page
Top of Page