Why is Paul willing to be spent for them?
Why does Paul express willingness to be "spent" for the Corinthians in 2 Corinthians 12:15?

Text and Rendering

“Now I will most gladly spend and be spent for your souls. If I love you more, am I to be loved less?” (2 Corinthians 12:15).

Paul joins two cognate verbs—dapanaō (“spend, expend”) and ekdapanaō (“expend utterly, exhaust”)—to depict pouring out both resources and life itself for the Corinthians’ spiritual welfare.


Immediate Literary Context

Chapters 10–13 form Paul’s “fool’s speech,” a vigorous defense against critics who questioned his apostolic legitimacy. He has just refused the financial patronage typical of itinerant teachers (12:13–14). By v. 15 he sharpens the point: rather than taking from them, he will impoverish himself for them, exposing the mercenary motives of the “super-apostles” (11:5, 20).


Parental Imagery and Covenant Pattern

In 12:14 Paul calls himself not merely a founder but a father: “children should not have to save up for their parents, but parents for their children.” The Tanakh associates covenant leaders with parental care (Numbers 11:12; Isaiah 49:15). Paul imitates that pattern, echoing Yahweh’s self-description: “I bore you on eagles’ wings” (Exodus 19:4). The willingness to be “spent” thus mirrors divine covenant love.


Christocentric Motive

Paul’s vocabulary evokes Christ’s self-giving: “For even the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). His earlier statement—“The love of Christ compels us, because we are convinced that One died for all” (2 Corinthians 5:14)—grounds his ethic. To “spend and be spent” is practical cruciformity, reflecting Galatians 2:20: “I have been crucified with Christ…”.


Missional and Soteriological Aim

The phrase “for your souls” (hyper tōn psychōn hymōn) focuses on eternal destiny, not mere temporal comfort. Paul wrote the letter after Titus’s report of Corinthian repentance (7:6–16), yet lingering sin (12:20–21) threatened fellowship with God. His self-expenditure targets their perseverance, for “you stand firm in the faith” (1 Corinthians 16:13).


Contrast with False Apostles and Greco-Roman Patronage

First-century Corinth prized patron-client reciprocity. Traveling rhetors expected honoraria; religious benefactors sought inscriptions. Archaeological finds such as the Erastus pavement (near the theater, dated c. A.D. 50) illustrate civic self-promotion. Paul deliberately undercuts that culture—he will leave no marble slab, only transformed lives (3:2–3).


Ethical and Psychological Dimension

Modern behavioral science confirms the power of sacrificial leadership to elevate group cohesion and moral aspiration (cf. contemporary studies on altruistic signaling and pro-social contagion). Paul intuitively applies that dynamic: by absorbing cost he invites the Corinthians to re-evaluate values shaped by a status-obsessed city.


Broader Pauline Witness

Phil 2:17: “Even if I am being poured out as a drink offering…”

1 Th 2:7–8: “We were gentle… like a nursing mother… we were delighted to share with you not only the gospel… but our very lives as well.”

Acts 20:24: “I consider my life worth nothing… if only I may finish the race.”

The pattern is consistent: gospel advance justifies any personal depletion.


Practical Instruction for the Church

1. Ministry motives: serve without transactional expectation.

2. Stewardship: resources are tools for eternal profit (Matthew 6:20).

3. Pastoral identity: leadership is parental, not managerial.

4. Resilience: willingly embrace exhaustion in light of resurrection hope (2 Corinthians 4:14–16).


Eschatological Horizon

Paul’s readiness to be spent is empowered by certainty that “He who raised the Lord Jesus will also raise us” (4:14). The resurrection guarantees that losses here become gains there, aligning economics with eternity.


Conclusion

Paul’s willingness to “spend and be spent” unites covenant love, Christ’s self-sacrifice, pastoral duty, and eschatological confidence. He models a life where personal depletion becomes spiritual investment, reversing Corinthian social values and inviting believers today to measure success by souls, not self.

How does 2 Corinthians 12:15 challenge our understanding of sacrificial love?
Top of Page
Top of Page