Why does 1 Chronicles 7:6 only mention three sons of Benjamin? Parallel Biblical Lists of Benjamin’s Sons • Genesis 46:21 lists: Bela, Becher, Ashbel, Gera, Naaman, Ehi, Rosh, Muppim, Huppim, and Ard (ten names). • Numbers 26:38-41 lists: Bela, Ashbel, Ahiram, Shupham, and Hupham (five clans). • 1 Chronicles 8:1-2 lists: Bela, Ashbel, Aharah, Nohah, and Rapha (five sons). These passages present three, five, or ten names. Harmonizing them requires recognizing ancient genealogical conventions, name variations, and the Chronicler’s purpose. Genealogical Conventions in Scripture 1. Telescoping—compressing generations by omitting lesser-known or deceased lines (cf. Ruth 4:18-22; Matthew 1:8-9). 2. Representative listing—recording only clan-founders or militarily significant heads (Numbers 26; Joshua 7:16-18). 3. Name fluidity—single individuals often bear multiple names or nicknames (e.g., Gideon = Jerub-Baal, Judges 6:32). 4. Levirate/adoption shifts—children may legally transfer to another lineage (Deuteronomy 25:5-6). Purpose of the Chronicler in 1 Chronicles 7 Chapters 7 & 8 focus on northern tribes that supplied soldiers to David (7:2, 5, 7, 9, 11, 40). The Chronicler highlights battle-ready lines: • Bela (7:7) — 22,034 valiant warriors. • Becher (7:8-9) — 20,200 mighty men. • Jediael (7:10-11) — 17,200 soldiers. Smaller or extinct lines (Ashbel, Gera, etc.) are omitted to showcase the three active militia lines of David’s era. Telescoping & Clan Aggregation Genesis 46 names ten grandsons of Jacob, including children and grandchildren. Numbers 26 reduces that list to five clan names after wilderness attrition. By David’s reign only three sizeable sub-tribes remain. The Chronicler therefore telescopes the list. Ancient Near-Eastern Parallels Tablets from Mari (18th c. BC) and Nuzi (15th c. BC) show tribal rosters changing names and numbers across generations, reflecting warfare casualties and clan mergers—precisely the pattern seen in Benjamin’s lists. Solutions Summarized 1. Three names in 7:6 are not all biological “sons” but the surviving warrior clans of Benjamin in David’s day. 2. Other sons appear under alternate appellations, absorbed lines, or deceased families in 7:12 and 8:1-2. 3. No contradiction arises; each list serves its own historical and theological function. Implications for Scriptural Reliability Apparent discrepancies drive the careful reader toward closer context, revealing literary purpose and historical nuance rather than error. The agreement of manuscripts, the logical distinction of generational lists, and consistency with Near-Eastern practice affirm the Bible’s coherence. Practical and Doctrinal Takeaways • God’s Word displays precision; apparent tensions invite discovery, not doubt (Proverbs 25:2). • The Chronicler’s focus on faithful warriors prefigures the New-Covenant call to spiritual warfare (Ephesians 6:10-18). • Believers can trust genealogical details that ultimately point to the lineage culminating in Christ, “the Lion of the tribe of Judah” (Revelation 5:5). |
    |