Why are "two or three witnesses" important in accusations against elders? Paul’s Clear Instruction “Do not entertain an accusation against an elder except on the testimony of two or three witnesses.” (1 Timothy 5:19) A Principle Rooted in God’s Law - “A lone witness is insufficient to establish any wrongdoing or sin against a man. It must be confirmed by the testimony of two or three witnesses.” (Deuteronomy 19:15) - “On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but he shall not be executed on the testimony of a lone witness.” (Deuteronomy 17:6) Repeated by Jesus and the Apostles - “Every matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.” (Matthew 18:16) - “By the testimony of two or three witnesses every matter will be established.” (2 Corinthians 13:1) - “In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid.” (John 8:17) - “Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses.” (Hebrews 10:28) Why Two or Three Witnesses? - Establishes objective truth, avoiding judgment based on hearsay or personal bias. - Protects elders, who—because of visibility and influence—are prime targets for malicious or frivolous accusations. - Guards the flock from corrupt leadership by ensuring real sin is exposed through corroborated testimony. - Preserves unity; substantiated facts quell gossip, suspicion, and division. - Reflects God’s own standard of justice, teaching impartiality and due process. Safeguarding Both Shepherd and Flock - Elders remain accountable, but not vulnerable to a single disgruntled voice. - Congregations gain confidence that discipline, when necessary, flows from clear evidence. - False accusers are deterred, knowing their claims must withstand honest scrutiny. - Genuine victims are encouraged, recognizing that multiple credible witnesses will validate their grievances. Practical Steps for Today - Receive any allegation formally, requesting written, signed statements. - Confirm at least two independent, consistent testimonies before moving forward. - Involve impartial leaders or a church board to examine evidence, ensuring transparency. - Communicate conclusions to the congregation only after facts are established, upholding both truth and grace. |
    |