Why does Mark 10:19 omit some commandments? Canonical Passage and Textual Rendering Mark 10:19 : “You know the commandments: ‘Do not murder, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, and Honor your father and mother.’ ” The list cites commandments 6, 7, 8, 9, inserts “Do not defraud,” and ends with the filial clause from commandment 5. Commandments 1–4 (“no other gods” through “remember the Sabbath”) and the wording of the 10th (“You shall not covet”) do not appear verbatim. Parallel Accounts in the Synoptic Gospels Matthew 19:18-19 reproduces the same human-relations commandments and ends with “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 18:20 mirrors Mark, including “Do not defraud.” The triune testimony of the Synoptics confirms that Jesus intentionally selected a representative subset rather than inadvertently omitting items. Immediate Narrative Context The questioner is a wealthy young synagogue ruler seeking eternal life (Mark 10:17; Luke 18:18). Jesus first directs him to the moral standards he already claims to know (Mark 10:19). The man answers, “Teacher, all these I have kept from my youth” (v. 20). The selective citation sets up the next verse: Jesus pinpoints the idol of riches (v. 21). Thus the “omission” is strategic: it guides the man to see that he violates the first commandment by worshiping wealth, even while believing he keeps the second-table commands. The Two Tablets Framework Exodus 20 divides naturally into a God-ward first tablet (commands 1-4) and a neighbor-ward second tablet (commands 5-10). Rabbinic shorthand frequently referenced only one tablet when the discussion centered on that relational sphere (cf. Mishnah, Makkot 3:16). Jesus, addressing the man’s social ethics, recites the neighbor-focused commands. This rabbinic method both tested the man’s professed righteousness and left the God-focused commands implicitly standing over him. Rhetorical and Pedagogical Purpose Ancient Jewish teachers often used ellipsis to stimulate reflection (e.g., Hillel’s “What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor,” Shabbat 31a, leaving the God-ward dimension unspoken). By listing the obvious social duties first, Jesus invites the hearer to supply the rest and discover the fracture point—idolatry. His pedagogy parallels Nathan’s parable to David (2 Samuel 12): highlight external compliance, then expose internal violation. Exposure of Hidden Idolatry The rich ruler’s wealth functioned as a rival deity (Matthew 6:24). When Jesus adds, “Go, sell all you own…then come, follow Me” (Mark 10:21), the man departs sorrowful, revealing he breaks commandment 1 (“You shall have no other gods before Me”) and commandment 10 (covetous desire). Therefore the so-called omission is actually an indictment: by not reciting the first commandment, Jesus leaves it ringing in the silence. “Do Not Defraud” and the Tenth Commandment “Do not covet” turns inward; “do not defraud” expresses its outward fruit (cf. Micah 2:2). In first-century Greek, apostereō (“defraud”) appears in Leviticus 19:13 LXX, a Mosaic expansion of the 8th and 10th commandments. By choosing a concrete economic term, Jesus directly addresses a land-owning class whose wealth could arise from exploitative tenancy—precisely the ruler’s context identified by first-century socioeconomic studies of Judea (cf. J. Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus, pp. 124-129). Jewish Rabbinic Pedagogy and Selective Citation Second-Temple sources show teachers citing commandments out of canonical order to emphasize application: Philo, Decalogue 109-115, groups them thematically; Qumran’s Community Rule (1QS 8.1-10) lists selective prohibitions for emphasis. Mark’s order—6, 7, 8, 9, “defraud,” 5—mirrors this thematic clustering: violent sins, sexual sin, property sin, judicial sin, economic oppression, filial piety. Harmony with the Whole Counsel of Scripture Scripture interprets Scripture. Romans 13:9 lists the same neighbor-centered commands and declares, “and whatever other commandment there may be, are summed up in this word: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ ” Jesus’ abbreviated list is therefore fully consistent with apostolic teaching that the second tablet summarizes horizontal morality. Theological Implications for Salvation By demonstrating that law-keeping cannot secure eternal life (Galatians 3:10-12) and by exposing idolatry, the passage drives the seeker to grace. Jesus, “looking at him, loved him” (Mark 10:21), then issues the salvific call, “follow Me.” The resurrection authenticates this call (Romans 1:4). Historical bedrock—attested by enemy attestation (Matthew 28:11-15), early creedal tradition (1 Corinthians 15:3-8), and empty-tomb inference—assures that following Christ is rationally warranted. Practical Application Believers must examine whether any possession, relationship, or ambition supplants God’s primacy. Outward moral respectability—“all these I have kept”—can mask the inward breach of the first commandment. True discipleship surrenders all to follow the risen Christ, trusting His promise of “treasure in heaven” (Mark 10:21). Summary Mark 10:19 omits the first-tablet commandments not through error but through deliberate pedagogical focus on neighbor-centered duties, exposing the ruler’s hidden idolatry and propelling the narrative toward Christ’s call to discipleship. Textual uniformity, cultural teaching patterns, and theological coherence collectively demonstrate that the verse’s selectivity magnifies, rather than diminishes, the wholeness of God’s moral law and the necessity of grace. |
    |