Why remove a sandal in Ruth 4:8?
What is the significance of removing a sandal in Ruth 4:8?

SANDAL REMOVAL IN RUTH 4:8


Biblical Text

“Then the redeemer said to Boaz, ‘Acquire it for yourself,’ and he removed his sandal.” (Ruth 4:8)


Historical-Legal Background

In ancient Israel, civil transactions lacked written contracts for common people; public, symbolic acts served to bind agreements. Verse 7 explains: “In former times in Israel, concerning redemption and exchange, to confirm a matter a man removed his sandal and gave it to his neighbor.” The act finalized the transfer of redeeming rights over land and lineage, witnessed by elders at the city gate—the community’s courtroom.


The Sandal as Symbol of Possession

A sandal represents the foot’s right to tread and thus to claim dominion (cf. Joshua 1:3; Psalm 60:8). Yielding one sandal signified surrender of one’s legal claim to walk the property. Boaz would now “walk” the field of Elimelech and the life of Ruth; the nearer kinsman renounced both.


Connection to Levirate Law and Ḥalitzah

Deuteronomy 25:7-10 prescribes that a brother-in-law unwilling to raise up seed for a widow must have his sandal removed and his face spat upon, and his family would be called “The House of the Unsandaled.” While Ruth 4 concerns a broader kinsman-redeemer (Heb. go’el) and not a literal brother-in-law, the sandal motif signals the same covenant logic: refusal carries public shame; acceptance brings restoration. The nearer redeemer avoids the disgrace by voluntarily unsandaling himself before witnesses, leaving Boaz free to fulfill the levirate spirit.


Ancient Near Eastern Parallels

Nuzi tablets (15th century BC) and Alalakh texts record exchange rites where an object (often a shoe or staff) is passed to ratify land transfers. Hittite law codes likewise equate “placing the foot” on territory with ownership. These parallels corroborate Ruth’s snapshot of Israelite practice without requiring later editorial gloss, affirming the narrative’s historicity.


Christological Typology

Boaz foreshadows Christ, the ultimate Go’el. The unnamed first redeemer pictures the Law—unable to redeem without jeopardizing its own “inheritance,” while Boaz, like grace, pays the full price. Christ likewise “put all things under His feet” (1 Corinthians 15:27). Just as Boaz receives the sandal and marries Ruth, so Jesus, by His resurrection, secures both the “land” (creation) and the “bride” (His people).


Theological and Practical Implications

1. Redemption Requires Renunciation: Salvation entails our yielding self-lordship; we hand Christ the sandal.

2. Public Testimony: The gate witnesses parallel believer’s baptism and communion—visible seals of an inward covenant.

3. Preservation of Covenant Line: The episode safeguards the Davidic lineage (Ruth 4:22), leading to Messiah; God’s providence operates through ordinary legal customs.

4. Assurance of Scripture’s Reliability: Archaeological parallels to the sandal rite support the Bible’s authenticity against higher-critical skepticism.


Conclusion

Removing the sandal in Ruth 4:8 is a legally binding, symbol-rich act that transfers rights, satisfies Mosaic precedent, sustains Messianic lineage, and prefigures Christ’s redeeming work.

How can we apply the concept of redemption in Ruth 4:8 to our lives?
Top of Page
Top of Page