Why did the Assyrian king send the Rabshakeh to Jerusalem in Isaiah 36:2? ISAIAH 36:2—WHY THE ASSYRIAN KING SENT THE RABSHAKEH TO JERUSALEM Historical Setting (c. 701 BC, 3293 AM in a Ussher‐style chronology) After the death of Shalmaneser V, Sargon II consolidated Assyrian control; his son Sennacherib began a major western campaign in the fourteenth year of King Hezekiah (Isaiah 36:1; 2 Kings 18:13). With Phoenicia and Philistia subdued, only fortified Judean cities and Jerusalem remained to resist Assyria’s demand for total vassalage and tribute. The Assyrian Monarch: Sennacherib’s Motives The annals on the Taylor Prism (lines 37–52) record, “As for Hezekiah of Judah, who had not submitted to my yoke, I fenced him in like a bird in a cage—Jeru‐salammu, his royal city.” Sennacherib sought (a) swift capitulation to avoid the costly siege of Jerusalem, (b) public humiliation of a rebellious vassal, and (c) preservation of the main Assyrian army for the Egyptian front. Sending emissaries rather than immediately assaulting the city matched common Assyrian policy: secure surrender through intimidation, then install garrisons without heavy losses. The Title and Role of “Rabshakeh” “Rabshakeh” (Akkadian rab–šaqê, “chief cupbearer”) denoted a senior palace official entrusted with diplomatic, military, and ceremonial duties—often functioning as field marshal and spokesman. Isaiah names three officers: Tartan (commander-in-chief), Rabsaris (chief eunuch), and Rabshakeh (chief spokesman) in a parallel account (2 Kings 18:17). The Rabshakeh’s high rank gave his words the full authority of Sennacherib. Immediate Geographic Context He “stood by the aqueduct of the upper pool, on the road to the Launderer’s Field” (Isaiah 36:2)—precisely where Isaiah had earlier confronted Ahaz (Isaiah 7:3). The location allowed the envoy to project his voice to soldiers lining the wall (v.12) and to threaten Jerusalem’s water supply, psychologically magnifying Assyria’s control. Diplomatic Objective: Demand for Unconditional Surrender a. Secure submission without siege (vv.4–5). b. Extract heavy tribute (paralleled in 2 Kings 18:14–16 where Hezekiah had already paid silver and gold). c. Receive hostages and open the gates (v.8). d. Enforce religious capitulation by equating Yahweh with defeated local deities (vv.18–20). Psychological Warfare Strategy 1. Use of the vernacular Hebrew (v.11) to bypass officials and speak directly to common citizens—unsettling morale. 2. Ridicule of Hezekiah’s military weakness: “You rely on Egypt, that splintered reed” (v.6). 3. Religious provocation: “Has not the LORD Himself sent me against this land to destroy it?” (v.10). 4. Promise of relocation to a “land like your own” (v.17), echoing Assyria’s mass-deportation policy recorded in the Nimrud Letters. Religious Polemic: Undercutting Trust in Yahweh The Rabshakeh deliberately misrepresented Hezekiah’s reforms (“Hezekiah has removed His high places,” v.7) to portray the king as having angered Yahweh. He then lumped Yahweh with the powerless gods of Hamath, Arpad, Sepharvaim, and Samaria (vv.18–20), challenging the distinctiveness of Judah’s God. This set the stage for the LORD’s dramatic vindication (Isaiah 37:36). Validation from Archaeology and External Records • Taylor Prism (British Museum, no. BM 91,032): corroborates Sennacherib’s campaign, tribute amounts, and Judean fortresses captured—“46 strong cities.” • Lachish Reliefs (Nineveh SW Palace, now in the British Museum): depict the siege of Lachish, exactly the launching point named in Isaiah 36:2. • Hezekiah’s Tunnel and the Siloam Inscription (Jerusalem): demonstrate Hezekiah’s water-security works alluded to by the Rabshakeh’s chosen meeting place. • Bullae bearing “Hezekiah son of Ahaz, king of Judah” (Ophel excavations, 2015) authenticate the historicity of the monarch under threat. These finds align with Isaiah’s narrative, affirming Scripture’s precision. Theological Significance The Rabshakeh’s mission forced Judah to choose between human alliances and covenant faithfulness. By permitting the taunts, God set the scene for a supernatural deliverance that foreshadowed the ultimate triumph of the Messiah over worldly powers. Isaiah’s record underscores that “the nations are like a drop in a bucket” (Isaiah 40:15), and deliverance is “by faith, not by might” (cf. Zechariah 4:6). Practical Application Believers facing intimidation must emulate Hezekiah’s response—seeking the LORD in prayer and submitting petitions to His word (Isaiah 37:14-20). Human rhetoric cannot nullify divine promises. As the empty tomb later proved, God’s vindication is decisive and historical. Summary Answer Sennacherib sent the Rabshakeh to Jerusalem to compel King Hezekiah’s unconditional surrender through intimidation, psychological warfare, and theological challenge, thus avoiding a protracted siege while demonstrating Assyrian supremacy. The encounter validated the reliability of Scripture through archaeological corroboration and highlighted the LORD’s unmatched sovereignty. |
    |