Why was Deut. 19:7 command given?
What historical context led to the command in Deuteronomy 19:7?

Canonical Setting within Deuteronomy

Deuteronomy 19:7—“Therefore I am commanding you to set apart for yourselves three cities.” The verse sits inside Moses’ second oration on the plains of Moab (Deuteronomy 4:44–28:68). Having re-stated covenant stipulations, Moses now turns to legislation meant to govern Israel once it crosses the Jordan for the conquest of Canaan, ca. 1406 BC.


Covenant Renewal on the Plains of Moab

After forty wilderness years, a new generation stands poised to enter the land. Deuteronomy functions as a suzerain-vassal treaty: Yahweh is King; Israel His vassal. The command to set aside refuge cities becomes one concrete way the vassal shows loyalty by protecting innocent life (Deuteronomy 19:10).


Ancient Near-Eastern Blood Vengeance

Tribal justice normally fell to the family goʾel (“avenger of blood”) who executed anyone killing a kinsman (Genesis 9:6). Mesopotamian codes (e.g., Hammurabi §§207-214) legitimize the practice but give no provision for accidental homicide. Yahweh’s law innovates by granting asylum, inserting due process, and thus preventing endless vendettas (Numbers 35:24–25).


Previously Named Eastern Cities of Refuge

Before Moses’ address, three eastern sites had been decreed (Numbers 35:14):

• Bezer (tribe of Reuben)

• Ramoth-Gilead (Gad)

• Golan (Manasseh)

Deuteronomy 19:1–7 calls for three more west of the Jordan once Israel occupies the land.


Western Cities Later Selected under Joshua

Joshua 20:7 lists the fulfillment:

• Kedesh in Galilee (Naphtali)

• Shechem in the hill-country of Ephraim

• Hebron (Kiriath-Arba) in Judah

Excavations at Tel Qedesh, Tel Balata (Shechem), and Tell er-Rumeileh (Hebron) reveal Late Bronze–Iron I urban levels, fortifications, and road networks—evidence these centers already had the infrastructure to function as sanctuaries.


Infrastructure and Signage

Deuteronomy 19:3—“You are to build roads for yourselves and divide the land into three regions.” Rabbinic memory (Makkot 2:5) notes that roads were widened to 32 cubits and signposts inscribed “מקלט” (miqlat, refuge) guided fugitives. Greek milestones found near ancient Kedesh preserve second-century BC Hebrew graffiti echoing the older practice.


Conditional Expansion Clause

Verses 8-9 anticipate territorial growth “if the LORD your God enlarges your territory.” Under David and Solomon the kingdom reached the Euphrates (1 Kings 4:21), yet no extra refuge cities appear in the biblical record, underscoring how obedience determined realization.


Legal–Theological Purposes

1. Sanctity of Life—Rooted in the imago Dei (Genesis 1:27; 9:6).

2. Curbing Violence—Transfers justice from clan revenge to impartial courts (Deuteronomy 19:12).

3. Typology of Salvation—Hebrews 6:18 depicts believers “fleeing for refuge” to Christ, linking the sanctuary cities to the gospel.


Contrast with Canaanite Culture

Ugaritic epics (KTU 1.2 ii) reveal unmitigated blood feuds or monetary ransom, lacking any institutional refuge, highlighting the moral distinctiveness of Torah law.


Sociological Perspective

Modern behavioral studies of honor cultures show reduced homicide rates where impartial legal venues replace kin retaliation. The Torah’s mandate functioned similarly for nascent Israelite society moving from nomadism to agrarian settlement.


Geographic Logic

The three western sites form a north-central-south axis with each within roughly a day’s walk from Israel’s borders, satisfying Deuteronomy 19:6—“lest the avenger of blood in hot anger pursue the manslayer because the distance is great.”


Force of the “Therefore”

The adverb עַל־כֵּן (ʿal kēn, “therefore”) ties verse 7 to verses 4–6, grounding the command in compassion for the innocent.


Summary

Deuteronomy 19:7 arises from Israel’s covenantal obligation, imminent settlement, and Yahweh’s concern for justice and mercy. By integrating social, legal, and theological dimensions, the command protected life, restrained vengeance, anticipated Christ’s ultimate refuge, and showcased the coherence of God’s law within history.

How does Deuteronomy 19:7 reflect God's justice and mercy?
Top of Page
Top of Page