Why were sacrifices given to priests?
Why were specific portions of sacrifices designated for priests in Deuteronomy 18:3?

Scriptural Text

“This shall be the priests’ share from the people who offer a sacrifice, whether an ox or a sheep: they must give the priest the shoulder, the jaws, and the stomach.” — Deuteronomy 18:3


Provision for a Landless Tribe

The Levites received no territorial inheritance (Deuteronomy 18:1; Numbers 18:20). Designating portions of every sacrifice ensured their daily sustenance so they could devote themselves wholly to worship, teaching, and adjudication (Leviticus 10:11; 2 Chronicles 31:4). In agrarian Israel, regular meat was rare; the command guaranteed nutritional staples otherwise unobtainable by field-less priests.


Divine Ownership, Delegated Support

All sacrificial animals were first and foremost the LORD’s (Leviticus 3:16). By granting part of what was His to His servants, God signaled that priestly support came from Him, not from priestly manipulation. Numbers 18:8-14 echoes this pattern: “I Myself have given you charge of My offerings” .


Symbolic Meaning of the Chosen Cuts

• Shoulder (foreleg) – seat of strength; God supplies the physical energy needed for ministry (cf. Isaiah 9:6 “government on His shoulder”).

• Jaws/Cheeks – instrument of speech; priests were guardians of God’s word (Malachi 2:7). Their mouths were to bless the nation, so the worshiper surrendered this portion.

• Stomach (maw) – inner parts; picture of inward devotion and compassion (Philippians 2:1). God nourishes the priest’s inner life even as the priest carries Israel’s inner burdens.


Contrast with Pagan Practices

Contemporary Near-Eastern cults paid priests through divination fees and temple prostitution texts found at Ugarit and Mari. Israel’s priests, by contrast, were provided for through holy offerings, severing any incentive toward occult revenue (Deuteronomy 18:10-14). Archaeological elephantine papyri (5th-century BC) record similar meat allotments for Yahwistic priests in Egypt, confirming the biblical model’s antiquity.


Safeguard for Worshipers

The fixed portion protected laypeople from priestly extortion (cf. 1 Samuel 2:12-17 where Eli’s sons seized extra meat). Clear regulation promoted justice and maintained trust between clergy and laity.


Typological Trajectory to Christ

The priest’s God-given share foreshadowed the ultimate Priest–King. Jesus, who “offered Himself” (Hebrews 7:27), also receives His due: redeemed people (Revelation 5:9-10). The specific pieces hint at His ministry—strong to save (shoulder), proclaiming truth (cheeks), moved with compassion (stomach, Matthew 9:36).


Continuity into the New Testament

Paul cites the principle, “Those who serve at the altar share in what is offered on the altar” (1 Corinthians 9:13-14), to validate financial support for gospel workers. The immutable ethic: God’s servants live from God’s house.


Archaeology and Historical Cohesion

• Tel Arad ostraca (7th-century BC) list “house of YHWH” tithes of grain and wine earmarked for priests.

• Hezekiah’s Broad Wall storage jars stamped “LMLK” indicate administrative networks capable of distributing priestly dues (2 Chronicles 31:11-12).

• Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC) proves Israel’s presence in Canaan, situating Deuteronomy’s laws in a plausible historical setting.


Ethical and Behavioral Implications

Supporting ministry teaches generosity, counters greed, and nurtures communal responsibility (Proverbs 3:9-10). Modern empirical studies on giving behavior show higher well-being among consistent givers, underscoring God’s design for mutual blessing.


Answering Common Objections

Objection: “The practice institutionalized privilege.”

Response: The allotment was modest, regulated, and tied to service; priests owned no farmland and performed labor-intensive duties (butchering, skinning, diagnosing leprosy). The system balanced provision with sacrifice.

Objection: “Couldn’t God have fed them miraculously?”

Response: He did on occasion (Numbers 11; 1 Kings 17), yet normally involves His people in meeting needs to cultivate stewardship and gratitude (2 Corinthians 9:11-12).


Practical Takeaways for Today

1. Regular, proportionate giving remains a God-ordained means of sustaining ministry.

2. Worship is holistic—material gifts mirror spiritual devotion.

3. Christ, the greater Priest, is worthy of our best, not our leftovers.


Conclusion

Specific portions were assigned to priests in Deuteronomy 18:3 to provide for a landless clergy, symbolize their calling, safeguard worshipers, and prefigure Christ’s ultimate priesthood—all within a historically verifiable and textually reliable framework that reveals God’s consistent care for both His servants and His people.

How does Deuteronomy 18:3 reflect the relationship between Israelites and their priests?
Top of Page
Top of Page