Why were the people in Jeremiah 6:15 unashamed of their abominations? Canonical Context Jeremiah 6:15 : “Were they ashamed of the abomination they committed? No, they were not ashamed at all; they did not even know how to blush. Therefore they will fall among the fallen; when I punish them, they will collapse, says the LORD.” Placed in the first temple–period oracles (ca. 627–586 BC), the verse functions as the LORD’s indictment against Judah’s leaders and populace immediately before the Babylonian invasion foretold in 6:22-26. Historical Setting: Late-Seventh Century BC Judah • Archaeological layers at Jerusalem’s City of David (Area G) and Lachish Level III reveal a prosperity spike followed by a sudden burn layer dated to Nebuchadnezzar’s 586 BC campaign (Ussher: 3416 AM). The prosperity allowed moral complacency (cf. Jeremiah 22:13-17). • Contemporary extrabiblical texts—e.g., the Lachish Ostraca—complain of corrupt Judean officials and manipulated prophetic messages, corroborating Jeremiah’s charge of systemic deceit (Jeremiah 5:31; 6:13-14). Theological Explanation: Hardened Conscience 1. Repeated Sin: Progressive tolerance of idolatry (Jeremiah 7:17-18) and social injustice (Jeremiah 5:27-28) desensitised moral receptors (Proverbs 29:1). 2. False Assurance: Priests and prophets cried, “Peace, peace” when there was no peace (Jeremiah 6:14); cognitive dissonance was soothed by religious spin, not repentance. 3. Suppression of Truth: Romans 1:18 parallels Judah’s suppression of God’s self-disclosure; a society that exchanges truth for lies soon “does not even know how to blush.” Covenant Background Under Deuteronomy 28 the covenant community agreed to blessings for obedience and curses for rebellion. By Jeremiah’s era, Torah scroll neglect (2 Kings 22 recounts Josiah’s rediscovery) meant the populace lacked regular covenant reminders that cultivate shame toward sin (Psalm 119:11). Where Scripture is silent, shame evaporates. Role of Leadership Jer 6:13 singles out “from the least to the greatest… all are greedy for gain.” When gatekeepers of morality capitulate, communal standards collapse (Hosea 4:9). Behavioral contagion research (Christakis & Fowler 2009) confirms moral conduct spreads through networks; Judah’s leaders seeded shamelessness. Spiritual Warfare Dimension Behind human agency lies demonic enticement to idol worship (Deuteronomy 32:17; 1 Corinthians 10:20). Demons celebrate shameless sin because guilt is a catalyst for repentance (2 Corinthians 7:10); remove shame, remove the warning light. Comparison with Jeremiah 8:12 The identical refrain in 8:12 frames a literary inclusio, bracketing the nation’s sins and highlighting God's just verdict. Notably, the Hebrew verb sequence intensifies from “not ashamed” to “could not blush,” showing moral free-fall. Christological Fulfilment Where Judah’s shame vanished, Messiah would bear shame vicariously (Isaiah 53:3; Hebrews 12:2). In the gospel, conviction of sin resurfaces by the Spirit (John 16:8), restoring the blush that leads to grace. Practical Application • Personal: Examine whether habitual sin has numbed conscience (Ephesians 4:19). • Ecclesial: Preach whole-counsel Scripture to retain a communal capacity for healthy shame (2 Timothy 4:2). • Cultural: Public policy detached from transcendent morality will mirror pre-exilic Judah’s shamelessness; prophetic voices must call nations back to objective truth (Psalm 33:12). Conclusion The people in Jeremiah 6:15 were unashamed because persistent sin, deceptive leadership, covenant neglect, spiritual blindness, and societal reinforcement converged to silence conscience. The remedy, then as now, is wholehearted return to the LORD whose word pierces, convicts, and restores. |
    |