If 1 John 5:7 is missing in many early manuscripts, how does that affect the reliability of this text? 1. The Text in Question 1 John 5:7 in many modern translations, including the Berean Standard Bible, appears simply as: “For there are three that testify:” (1 John 5:7) Some translations, often following the Textus Receptus tradition, include additional words sometimes called the “Comma Johanneum” or “Johannine Comma,” which reads in the King James Version: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” The differences revolve around whether to include the specific mention of “the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost” in this verse. Because many early Greek manuscripts do not contain this longer wording, questions arise about whether the omission affects the reliability of the text as a whole. 2. Historical Background of the Comma Johanneum The longer reading of 1 John 5:7 appears in various later Latin manuscripts and likely entered the Greek manuscript tradition through marginal notes that were eventually incorporated into the main text. Early church councils and theologians in Latin-speaking regions sometimes quoted this expanded passage to reinforce trinitarian teaching. Scholars examining the manuscript evidence—such as those building upon the work of noted experts in textual criticism—observe that the Comma Johanneum is absent from the vast majority of Greek manuscripts prior to the medieval period. When the text of the New Testament was compiled for some early printed Bibles (notably Erasmus’s first editions of the Greek text), pressure existed to include the Comma based on limited manuscript evidence. Later, the Textus Receptus tradition continued to carry it forward. 3. Evidence from Early Manuscripts • Greek Manuscript Witnesses: The oldest Greek manuscripts—such as Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus—do not include the extra phrase. In fact, only a few late Greek manuscripts show it. These manuscripts confirm that the shorter reading (found in modern translations like the Berean Standard Bible) is what appears in the earliest and most reliable witnesses. • Latin Manuscript Tradition: While many Latin manuscripts (especially from the Middle Ages) do contain the longer reading, this pattern reflects regional theological usage and the practice of copying marginal clarifications into the text. Textual critics including Dr. James White and Dr. Dan Wallace have long noted this difference between the Greek and Latin traditions. • Patristic Citations: Early Church Fathers often wrote extensively about the nature of the Trinity, yet typically cited 1 John 5:7 in its shorter form or without the phrase mentioning the three heavenly witnesses. While some Latin Fathers appear to quote the extended version, most earlier or geographically diverse sources do not, suggesting that the longer text was not part of the universally received tradition. 4. Doctrinal Considerations and the Nature of the Trinity The question arises whether removing these extra words diminishes or negates the doctrine of the Trinity. The broader testimony of Scripture thoroughly supports the unity and co-eternality of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (e.g., Matthew 28:19; John 10:30; John 20:28; Acts 5:3–4). Thus, even without the Comma Johanneum, the biblical case for the triune nature of God remains robust and consistent. Church historians and textual scholars note that doctrinal clarity about the Trinity rests on a wide range of passages—both Old and New Testament—rather than a single verse. This truth reflects the cohesiveness of the entire Bible in revealing that God is eternal, that Christ is risen from the dead for salvation, and that the Holy Spirit is the abiding presence of God in believers. 5. Reliability of 1 John and the Broader Scripture • Quantity and Quality of Manuscripts: Despite variations in certain passages like 1 John 5:7, the New Testament is supported by an overwhelming number of Greek manuscripts—plus ancient versions, writings of early Christian leaders, and extensive quotations. Archaeological findings such as the John Rylands Papyrus (P52) and the thousands of other manuscript fragments underscore that the New Testament text is consistent and reliably preserved. • Ancient Transmissions: The scribe culture carefully copied Scripture, creating a high degree of textual uniformity. While some textual variants exist, they typically concern minor words or phrases that do not affect major doctrines. In the case of 1 John 5:7, the difference involves an addition found in fewer, later manuscripts rather than an omission in earlier ones. • Harmonization of Passages: Even without the longer reading, 1 John 5:6–8 still teaches that the Spirit, the water, and the blood testify to Jesus as the Son of God. The broader context of 1 John and the rest of Scripture unmistakably affirms core doctrines: Christ’s deity, the bodily resurrection, forgiveness of sins, and salvation through faith in Him. 6. Implications for Faith and Confidence Some readers worry that discovering a textual variant in 1 John 5:7 might cast doubt on the trustworthiness of the Bible. However, close investigation demonstrates the opposite. The faithful transmission of text families, the discipline of textual criticism, and the massive quantity of early scriptural sources all work together to confirm that the Bible readers hold today is accurate and reliable. The absence of the Comma Johanneum in earlier Greek manuscripts need not undermine confidence in this epistle or the New Testament’s integrity. Instead, it showcases the diligence of scholars, scribes, and believers throughout history, who scrupulously preserved the message of Scripture. Even as a textual variant, it does not introduce or remove any essential doctrine. The teaching on the Triune nature of God stands securely on the broader base of biblical support. 7. Conclusion The short answer is that the absence of the Comma Johanneum (the longer reading of 1 John 5:7) in many early manuscripts does not diminish the reliability of the text. The biblical doctrine of the Trinity does not rest solely on this verse, and the overall manuscript tradition of 1 John remains remarkably consistent. Across textual witnesses, archaeological evidence, patristic writings, and modern scholarly analysis, the integrity of Scripture stands firm, grounded ultimately in the trustworthy character of its Divine Author. |
    |