Luke 1:5: If Herod the Great died around 4 BC, how does this timeline match with the birth announcements described here? Luke 1:5 in Historical Context In the Berean Standard Bible, Luke 1:5 reads: “In the time of Herod king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah of the division of Abijah.” Questions often arise regarding how Luke 1:5 aligns with the commonly referenced date of Herod the Great’s death, which is often placed around 4 BC, and the timing of the birth announcements of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ. Below is a comprehensive exploration of the historical context, textual considerations, and solutions proposed to reconcile the timeline. 1. Overview of the Historical Question Herod the Great’s death is traditionally dated to about 4 BC, largely based on the writings of the first-century historian Flavius Josephus, who connects Herod’s death to a lunar eclipse that occurred shortly before Passover (Josephus, Antiquities 17.6.4; 17.8.4). Because Luke signifies these events took place in Herod’s reign, critics question whether Luke’s account might conflict with the widely circulated 4 BC date. Several factors must be considered, such as the chronology in Josephus, the possible margins of error in our modern BC/AD system, and the internal details of the Gospels (including Luke’s precise historical notes). 2. Possible Revisions of Herod’s Death Date 1. Alternate Lunar Eclipses Some researchers note that Josephus records a lunar eclipse before Herod’s death. Though there was an eclipse in 4 BC, there was also another more total eclipse in 1 BC that some propose is the one Josephus referenced. This would shift Herod’s death later, between 1 BC and early 1 AD, thus removing conflict with Luke’s account. 2. Josephus’s Chronological Considerations Josephus’s numbering of Herod’s regnal years has proven difficult to reconcile precisely. Scholars suggest that certain editorial or copying errors in Josephus’s texts could have led to earlier or later dating. While most historians still favor 4 BC, the possibility of 1 BC remains strong among some scholars, creating room for Luke’s account to align comfortably with Herod’s later demise. 3. Multiple Reigns and Overlaps In the ancient world, there were often co-regencies or overlapping rule calculations. Herod might have been declared “king” earlier than the official start of his recognized reign, which may explain why there is variance when trying to align Josephus’s information with the Gospels. 3. Chronological Clues in Luke’s Gospel 1. Luke 1:5 and Priesthood Rotations The reference to Zechariah of the “division of Abijah” (Luke 1:5) points to an Israelite priestly cycle that occurred twice annually. Various historical reconstructions suggest that Zechariah would have been in the Temple serving during a specific window of time (see 1 Chronicles 24:7–19 for details on priestly divisions). These windows potentially line up with the narrative of Elizabeth’s conception of John the Baptist. 2. The Census and Luke 2 Luke 2:1–2 mentions a census under Quirinius. There is ongoing scholarly debate about the precise dating of this census. Some suggest an earlier, lesser-known census or enrollment could place Christ’s birth around 6–4 BC. Others posit that Quirinius had overlapping administrative roles before the well-documented census of AD 6. In either scenario, Luke points to real historical markers known to first-century readers, indicating he was careful about chronological details. 3. Comparison with Matthew’s Timeline Matthew’s Gospel ties Jesus’ birth to Herod’s rule (Matthew 2:1–3); Herod attempts to kill the infant Christ. This presupposes that Herod was alive at the time of Jesus’ infancy, which suggests a date no later than early 4 BC if Herod indeed died that year. However, if a 1 BC date is upheld by the alternate interpretations of Josephus’s eclipse, the timeline comfortably accommodates Jesus being born closer to 2 or 1 BC. 4. Resolution of the Timeline 1. Dating the Birth Announcements Earlier Luke’s narrative components (the angelic announcement to Zechariah, the subsequent conception of Elizabeth, and the angelic announcement to Mary) do not necessarily occur within a short span of weeks or months. These events could stretch from 6 BC to 4 BC if Herod’s death is taken at 4 BC, allowing enough space for both John the Baptist and Jesus to be born while Herod was still alive. 2. Possibility of Jesus’ Birth Before 4 BC If Jesus was born in 5 or 6 BC, that would place His birth squarely under Herod’s reign, with the events described in Matthew 2 (the Magi’s visit, Herod’s decree against infant boys) coming just before Herod’s passing. Luke 1:5 would accurately note the time marker “in the days of Herod,” as it includes announcements about John’s and Jesus’ impending births during Herod’s final years. 3. Acceptance of Slight Shifts in our BC/AD System The concept that Jesus was actually born several years “Before Christ” is not uncommon among historians and biblical scholars. When the BC/AD system was instituted, it may have contained small miscalculations. Even a brief shift of 2–4 years in the current system would make “4 BC” effectively the same as “year zero” for the birth of Christ. 5. Archaeological and Historical Corroborations 1. Josephus’s Mentions of Herod’s Public Works Archaeological records confirm Herod’s extensive building projects (e.g., the expansion of the Second Temple, the construction of the Herodium, and the port at Caesarea). These line up with the general timeframe mentioned by the Gospels, placing Herod’s final years in the late first century BC. 2. Discovery of Herod’s Tomb In 2007, archaeologist Ehud Netzer announced the discovery of what many believe to be Herod’s tomb at Herodium, bearing an inscription and architectural details consistent with his final days. While this discovery does not yield exact month-and-year dating, it reinforces the recognized window for Herod’s end of life. 3. Early Church Writers and Patristic Tradition Early Church writings (e.g., the second-century testimonies of Justin Martyr and later references by Tatian or Tertullian) accept the broad timeframe of Jesus’ birth during Herod’s life but do not provide the level of chronological precision some might hope for. They affirm, however, that Jesus was born in Herod’s reign and place His birth slightly earlier than the AD line typically suggests. 6. Harmonizing Luke 1:5 with Herod’s Death Combining all the evidence results in a plausible picture: 1. Herod’s Last Years The events of Luke 1:5, including Zechariah’s time of service, align with Herod’s still being alive. Since John the Baptist is estimated by many to have been born around 5 BC, the angelic announcement to Zechariah could be placed close to 6 BC. 2. Overlap for Jesus’ Conception and Birth Luke recounts Mary’s conception of Jesus roughly six months after Elizabeth’s (Luke 1:36). This timeline would place Jesus’ birth not long before Herod’s death if we hold to the 4 BC date or fit neatly if Herod died a bit later (1 BC). In either case, Jesus’ infancy took place under Herod’s rule, making sense of the events in Matthew 2:1–16. 3. Luke’s Detail-Oriented Narrative Luke claims to have carefully investigated “everything from the beginning” (Luke 1:3). This detail-oriented approach implies that his reference to Herod is intended to ground the narrative in a verifiable historical context. Whether one accepts 4 BC or a 1 BC alternate date, the essential agreement among biblical historians is that Jesus was indeed born under Herod’s reign, satisfying Luke’s statement. Conclusion Luke 1:5, stating that Zechariah’s priestly ministry began “in the time of Herod king of Judea,” is consistent with the historical data when we account for the possible ranges in Herod’s death date—and the realistic margins of error in ancient chronology. Whether Herod died in 4 BC or slightly later, the events Luke describes can be aligned with a birth of John the Baptist and Jesus before or in close proximity to Herod’s final year(s). Thus, scripture’s internal coherence stands intact, with Luke 1:5 accurately situating the priestly service of Zechariah and the birth announcements of both John and Jesus during Herod’s rulership. This offers a comprehensive and historically defensible understanding that upholds the Gospel accounts. |
    |