If Jericho’s walls had already crumbled before Joshua’s era, how does Joshua 2:15 align with historical timelines? I. Overview of the Question The inquiry centers on Joshua 2:15, which states: “So she let them down by a rope through the window, since the house where she lived was built into the wall of the city.” Some have claimed that Jericho’s walls may have already crumbled before Joshua’s era, raising the question of how Rahab’s house could still be integrated into a city wall. This entry will explore the historical timelines, biblical context, archaeological findings, and textual considerations that speak to the reliability of Joshua 2:15 in relation to the broader narrative of Jericho’s fortifications. II. Context of Jericho in Scripture Several biblical references depict Jericho as a fortified city during Joshua’s time. Prior to the Israelites’ conquest, Joshua 2–6 describes intricate details of the city’s defenses, the mission of the Israelite spies, Rahab’s assistance, and ultimately the miraculous collapse of the walls (Joshua 6:20). These passages present Jericho as still possessing formidable fortifications at the time of Israel’s entry into Canaan. A. The Role of Rahab’s Household In Joshua 2, Rahab’s role as a resident of the city’s perimeter fortification is clearly established: • Joshua 2:15 describes her house as part of the city wall. • Joshua 6:17 indicates she was spared during the destruction. This suggests that, even if segments of the defensive structures had deteriorated in earlier eras, her portion of the city wall remained serviceable or fortified enough to accommodate livelihood. III. Historical Timelines and Archaeological Discoveries Over the past century, multiple archaeological expeditions have investigated the ancient site of Jericho (Tell es-Sultan), yielding differing conclusions regarding the state of the city in various periods. A. Early Explorations • John Garstang (1930s) found evidence that he interpreted as supporting the biblical timeline of a destructed Canaanite city around the Late Bronze Age, correlating it with the account in the Book of Joshua. • Kathleen Kenyon (1950s) concluded that Jericho’s main fortifications had fallen centuries earlier than the standard biblical dating. Yet, her methods and the dating of pottery uncovered have been noted by some researchers as open to re-interpretation. B. Subsequent Investigations and Reassessments • More recent analyses of stratigraphy and pottery styles by scholars such as Bryant Wood have suggested that city walls were indeed standing closer to the time traditionally understood for Joshua’s conquest (c. 1400 BC, depending on one’s chronology). • Areas of partial collapse or earlier destruction have been identified, hinting that Jericho experienced multiple cycles of rebuilding and destruction over centuries. This nuanced picture allows for the possibility that though walls had crumbled in earlier epochs, a fortified settlement (with portions of perimeter walls) could have been functional in Joshua’s day. IV. Reconciling the Chronology A key component of the question is dating. Some maintain that Jericho’s walls collapsed too early to match Joshua’s account. Others argue that a re-evaluation of the archaeological data can vindicate a later timeline. A. Possible Rebuilds and Partial Walls Cities in antiquity were often rebuilt atop earlier remains, sometimes utilizing older structures. Even if a significant destruction event predated Joshua, it is plausible the city or segments of fortifications were renewed or kept partially intact. B. The Houses Incorporated into Fortifications Ancient Near Eastern cities commonly integrated residential dwellings into city walls; sometimes these fortifications had multiple layers or partial reconstructions over time. This aligns with Joshua 2:15, indicating Rahab’s residence was established within a remnant or rebuilt portion of the fortification. V. The Preservation of Rahab’s Dwelling Scripture consistently highlights that certain parts of Jericho did not share in the immediate collapse. Joshua 6:17 underscores that Rahab and her family were spared. Additionally, Joshua 6:23 shows that individuals within her home survived: “So the young men who had spied out the land went in and brought out Rahab, her father and mother, her brothers, and everyone belonging to her.” From a historical and structural perspective, the integrity of Rahab’s house could have been underpinned by a different or supplementary foundation (like a retaining wall or defensive rampart), allowing it to remain standing when so much else collapsed. VI. Alignment of Scripture with Historical Timelines A. Multifaceted Archaeological Evidence When studying ancient sites such as Jericho, entire sets of fortifications need not remain intact for the biblical text to hold true. Jericho’s walls might have undergone multiple partial destructions and reconstructions. This framework explains how, in a period consistent with Joshua’s timeframe, portions of the fortifications still stood, supporting living quarters like Rahab’s. B. The Biblical Consistency Scripture’s historical narratives typically reference real locations that align with known ancient geography. The conversation on Jericho illustrates that archaeological findings can appear contradictory when taken in isolation, yet become more coherent upon close examination of context, pottery sequences, geomorphology, and textual analysis. Scholarly reassessments often lend support to—rather than detract from—the reliability of biblical accounts. VII. Faithfulness of the Biblical Record A. The Weight of Manuscript Evidence Canonical texts, including the Book of Joshua, appear consistently in early manuscript witnesses (such as the Septuagint, discovered scriptural fragments near Qumran, and later Masoretic Text traditions). The sections describing Jericho’s siege and Rahab’s salvation show remarkable unity in their textual tradition. B. Integrity of Scripture’s Internal Chronology The narrative from Exodus to Joshua describes a people group migrating out of Egypt, wandering in the wilderness, then entering Canaan. The text’s internal dating places the conquest of Jericho in the mid-to-late 15th century BC. The genealogical datelines and references to Egyptian and Canaanite contexts mesh with other details gleaned from external sources, supporting a consistent timeline rather than a haphazard patchwork. VIII. Conclusion Joshua 2:15 does not conflict with known historical and archaeological data that might suggest previous wall collapses in Jericho. Evidence indicates that while Jericho’s walls may have experienced multiple phases of destruction, fortifications or built-up embankments in the city’s perimeter were still present and functional by Joshua’s era. Rahab’s dwelling was likely located within a portion of fortification that was still standing, permitting her to shelter and rescue the two Israelite spies. Far from undermining the narrative, archeological debates over Jericho’s layers and destruction events illustrate the complexity of ancient city life. In this way, the biblical account aligns with the idea that parts of Jericho were rebuilt or still intact, making Rahab’s window a legitimate detail in the story of Joshua’s conquest. The ultimate cohesion of these historical, scriptural, and archaeological threads affirms the consistent reliability of the biblical record. |
    |