How to reconcile Gal. 1:17–18 with Acts 9?
In Galatians 1:17–18, Paul says he did not go to Jerusalem immediately after his conversion, yet Acts 9 suggests otherwise; how do we reconcile this conflict?

Context of the Passage

Galatians 1:17–18 reads: “nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me. Instead, I went into Arabia, and later returned to Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to confer with Cephas, and I stayed with him fifteen days.” Meanwhile, Acts 9 captures Paul’s post-conversion experiences, including his initial time in Damascus and the threat on his life that led to his escape. On a first reading, Galatians 1 might seem to conflict with Acts 9––the question arises whether Paul went immediately to Jerusalem or not.

Below is a thorough consideration of how these two passages can be reconciled.


Galatians 1:17–18: Paul’s Emphasis

Paul’s words in Galatians 1 serve a specific purpose: he insists that his gospel message did not come from human sources. He highlights how he received it directly from God and not from consultation with the apostles in Jerusalem.

1. Purpose of the Statement

• Paul is emphasizing his independence in receiving revelation (Galatians 1:12).

• He mentions “I did not go up to Jerusalem” to show he did not immediately seek validation from human teachers.

2. Timeline Mentioned

• After his encounter on the road to Damascus, Paul “went into Arabia” (Galatians 1:17).

• Then he “returned to Damascus,” and only “after three years” did he head to Jerusalem (Galatians 1:17–18).

These details highlight Paul’s own memory of his movements: conversion on the road, time in Arabia, return to Damascus, and eventually a visit to Jerusalem.


Acts 9: Paul’s Early Ministry Activity

Acts 9 tracks Paul’s dramatic conversion and subsequent ministry in Damascus. Luke’s focus is different: he highlights the communal and missionary aspects of Paul’s activity.

1. Immediate Preaching in Damascus

Acts 9:20 “Saul promptly began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, declaring, ‘He is the Son of God.’”

• His preaching led to amazement among Jews in Damascus.

2. Threat and Escape

Acts 9:23 states, “After many days had passed, the Jews conspired to kill him.”

• Paul is then lowered in a basket to escape Damascus (Acts 9:25).

3. Short Jerusalem Visit Recorded

Acts 9:26: “When Saul arrived in Jerusalem, he tried to join the disciples, but they were all afraid of him, not believing he was a disciple.”

• This leads to Barnabas vouching for him (Acts 9:27).

Luke then swiftly narrates Paul’s brief time in Jerusalem, demonstrating how the disciples came to trust him through Barnabas’s advocacy.


Proposed Harmonization

The statements in both Galatians 1 and Acts 9 consider overlapping but not identical time frames, highlighting different emphases.

1. Arabia Gap in Acts

Acts 9 compresses the time after Paul’s initial preaching in Damascus. It does not mention Paul’s journey to Arabia because Luke’s main interest is describing the growth of the early church and Paul’s bold preaching.

• The phrase “After many days had passed” (Acts 9:23) covers the intervening period, which Galatians 1 clarifies could include Paul’s travels in Arabia.

2. Temporal Sequence

• Paul’s immediate activities after conversion included some days in Damascus, preaching and astounding the Jewish community (Acts 9:19–22).

• At some point after those initial days, he departed for Arabia (Galatians 1:17).

• He returned to Damascus, continuing ministry there.

• Only after about three years total from his conversion did he go up to Jerusalem (Galatians 1:18).

3. Acts 9:26 and Galatians 1:18

Acts 9:26 describes Paul arriving in Jerusalem after “many days” in Damascus, consistent with the approximate three-year period in Galatians.

• Neither Luke nor Paul is attempting an exhaustive chronology in these passages but focusing on distinct points: Paul’s apostolic independence in Galatians, and the expansion of the gospel in Acts.


Clarification of Intent

Galatians 1 is a theological statement about Paul’s authority and the divine origin of his message. Acts 9 is a historical narration highlighting the early church’s acceptance of Paul. Both references fit together when understood as different perspectives with complementary information.

1. Different Authors, Different Purposes

• Paul (author of Galatians) underscores that he was not taught by human apostles, so he pointedly mentions delaying contact with those in Jerusalem.

• Luke (author of Acts) focuses on how Paul integrated into the early church and gave key events in summary form.

2. Selective Reporting

• Neither writer gives a blow-by-blow account of all activities.

• The missing Arabia detail in Acts 9 does not invalidate Luke’s record––it simply was not crucial for the purpose of demonstrating Paul’s acceptance among believers.


Resolution of the Apparent Conflict

There is no genuine contradiction once we see that Paul’s trip to Arabia occurred during the same general timeframe covered by the expansive phrase “many days” in Acts 9. Paul and Luke each chose to emphasize events relevant to their distinct purposes. In combining their narratives, we discover the fuller timeline:

• Paul is converted on the road to Damascus.

• He preaches in Damascus for a short period.

• He travels to Arabia, spends some time there.

• He returns to Damascus to continue ministry.

• About three years in total pass before his first formal visit to Jerusalem.


Conclusion

Both Galatians 1:17–18 and Acts 9 align well when recognizing that each writer selected details to suit a unique framework. Paul's emphasis on independence and direct revelation motivates his mention of a delay before visiting Jerusalem, while Luke’s summary in Acts highlights the overall flow of Paul’s early ministry.

Because these passages were written in different contexts yet reflect the same historical realities, no true contradiction arises. The “many days” in Acts 9 plausibly encapsulates the period in Arabia that Paul references in Galatians 1. This complementary perspective affirms the consistent testimony of Scripture regarding Paul’s conversion and early ministry.

Is there evidence of Paul's prominence?
Top of Page
Top of Page