How do we reconcile 2 Samuel 21:19 (attributing Goliath’s death to Elhanan) with David’s victory in 1 Samuel 17? Background of the Passages 1 Samuel 17 describes David defeating Goliath the Gittite in a famous encounter that highlights David’s faith and God’s deliverance of Israel. In contrast, 2 Samuel 21:19 reads: “Once again there was a battle with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan son of Jaare-oregim the Bethlehemite struck Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.” This verse seems to attribute Goliath’s death to Elhanan, creating a question of consistency: Did David or Elhanan kill Goliath? The account in 1 Chronicles 20:5 provides a parallel reference: “And once again there was war with the Philistines, and Elhanan son of Jair struck down Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.” 1 Chronicles 20:5 clarifies that Elhanan killed Lahmi, Goliath’s brother, not Goliath himself. This clear statement stands as an authoritative guide in addressing the textual question in 2 Samuel 21:19. Textual Explanation and Scribal Transmission Multiple manuscript strands attest to the reliability of Scripture, yet minor copyist mistakes occurred throughout history. When the Hebrew text of 2 Samuel 21:19 was copied, a probable scribal omission of the phrase “the brother of” occurred. Such a small slip can create a seemingly large discrepancy but is resolved when compared with 1 Chronicles 20:5. Early Aramaic translations (Targum Jonathan on 2 Samuel 21:19) also contain “the brother of,” reinforcing 1 Chronicles 20:5. In Hebrew, the difference between “et-Lahmi” (אֶת־לַחְמִי, meaning “Lahmi”) and “the Bethlehemite” (בֵּית הַלַּחְמִי, “the Bethlehemite”) can be visually subtle in some scripts. It is plausible that the original scribe’s eyes jumped or merged words, resulting in the shortened reading. This kind of scribal slip does not undermine the overall textual reliability but highlights the importance of comparing Scripture passages (the principle of comparing 2 Samuel 21:19 with 1 Chronicles 20:5). Chronicles as a Clarifying Parallel 1 Chronicles 20 repeats many historical events also found in 1 and 2 Samuel. Using this “parallel text” method has long been a standard approach among textual scholars to resolve ambiguous readings: • 1 Samuel 17: David kills Goliath. • 2 Samuel 21:19 as found in most modern Hebrew manuscripts: Elhanan kills “Goliath.” • 1 Chronicles 20:5 clarifies explicitly: Elhanan kills Lahmi, Goliath’s brother. By reading these accounts side by side, the identification of this “Goliath” in 2 Samuel 21:19 is rectified by 1 Chronicles 20:5. Consistency in Ancient Manuscripts Archaeological efforts in sites such as Qumran (with the Dead Sea Scrolls) showcase generally high consistency in Old Testament passages. Although fragments do not specifically cover every portion of 2 Samuel or 1 Chronicles, the overall witness of the scrolls and other ancient sources-such as the Septuagint (Greek translation) and Targum (Aramaic translation)-demonstrates remarkable stability in biblical transmission. These external evidences add weight to the conclusion that a small copyist error rather than contradictory history is at play in 2 Samuel 21:19. Further, references to Gath (the Philistine city of Goliath and his kin) discovered at Tell es-Safi provide background for the biblical setting. Archaeologists have uncovered evidence that Gath was indeed a major Philistine center, supporting biblical descriptions of its prominence. This, combined with the consistency of mention in parallel biblical passages, builds confidence in the reliability of the narratives surrounding the Philistine conflicts. Reconciling the Accounts 1. David’s Victory Is Unchallenged. The narrative in 1 Samuel 17 leaves no doubt: David killed Goliath. Subsequent biblical commentary (such as 2 Samuel 21:22) also acknowledges that the giant Goliath was slain by David (“These four were descended from Rapha in Gath, and they fell at the hands of David and his servants” -). 2. Elhanan’s Victory over Lahmi. 2 Samuel 21:19 is best understood through comparison with 1 Chronicles 20:5, concluding Elhanan killed Goliath’s brother Lahmi. The phrase “the brother of” was inadvertently omitted in the 2 Samuel passage by a scribe. 3. No Colliding Histories. The repetition of Goliath’s name in some versions of the 2 Samuel passage was likely due to this scribal issue. It does not signal any fundamental contradiction but instead shows how Chronicles can function as a clarifying textual witness. 4. Broader Reliability of Scripture. Instances like these, inspected through textual criticism, do not threaten the integrity of the biblical record. Rather, they highlight the importance of cross-referencing parallel accounts, which consistently confirm the same historical events with minimal-though instructive-copyist errors. Implications for Understanding Biblical Reliability When read in context, the entire scriptural account stands in harmony: David’s feat in 1 Samuel 17 remains intact, and Elhanan’s act described in 2 Samuel 21:19 and 1 Chronicles 20:5 becomes clear. These texts, affirmed by parallel references, manuscript traditions, and early translations, reflect one consistent historical framework. Such harmony contributes to the broader case for the trustworthiness of the biblical narrative: internal consistency, external corroboration through archaeology, and responsible textual criticism all indicate that Scripture accurately preserves its original witness. Conclusion In reconciling 2 Samuel 21:19 with David’s victory in 1 Samuel 17, the simplest and most consistent resolution is that Elhanan killed Lahmi, the brother of Goliath, and was never said to have struck down Goliath himself. The Chronicles account (1 Chronicles 20:5) clarifies this detail explicitly, revealing a copyist slip in the 2 Samuel version. Therefore, both David’s defeat of Goliath and Elhanan’s subsequent defeat of Goliath’s brother stand as coherent and historically grounded within the biblical record. |
    |