Genesis 50:24–25 mentions Joseph’s assurance that his bones will eventually leave Egypt. Is there any extrabiblical evidence suggesting a later fulfillment of this promise? Historical Background of Genesis 50:24–25 Genesis 50:24–25 states, “Then Joseph said to his brothers, ‘I am about to die, but God will surely attend to you and bring you up from this land to the land He promised on oath to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.’ So Joseph made the sons of Israel swear an oath, saying, ‘When God attends to you, you shall carry my bones up from this place.’” In the context of the Book of Genesis, Joseph’s request underscores confidence in the covenant promises given to Abraham (Genesis 12:1–3), Isaac (Genesis 26:1–5), and Jacob (Genesis 28:13–15). These promises included the inheritance of Canaan. Joseph’s expressed wish to have his bones brought out of Egypt directly links his personal legacy to God’s broader redemptive plan for Israel. Biblical Fulfillment of Joseph’s Request Scripture itself testifies to the fulfillment of Joseph’s request in two key passages: 1. Exodus 13:19: “Moses took the bones of Joseph with him, because Joseph had made the sons of Israel swear an oath. He had said, ‘God will surely attend to you, and then you must carry my bones with you from this place.’” 2. Joshua 24:32: “And the bones of Joseph, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the plot of ground that Jacob had purchased from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, for a hundred pieces of silver. So it became an inheritance for Joseph’s descendants.” From these verses, the Bible provides an internal narrative of how Joseph’s remains were ultimately brought to the land of Canaan and buried in Shechem, fulfilling the oath sworn to him centuries earlier. Introduction to Extrabiblical Evidence While the biblical text clearly confirms that Joseph’s bones left Egypt, modern readers and researchers often look for corroboration outside of Scripture to support these events. Though direct extrabiblical references to Joseph’s bones being carried out of Egypt are limited, there are historical and archaeological sources that point to longstanding traditions about Joseph’s final resting place in Canaan and the Exodus itself. Below are several lines of evidence and tradition that suggest continuity with the scriptural account. Jewish Historical and Rabbinic Writings 1. Flavius Josephus (1st century AD): In “Antiquities of the Jews,” Josephus reiterates the biblical narrative that Moses removed Joseph’s bones during the Exodus (cf. Antiquities 2.198–200). Josephus’s work does not introduce new data on the event but demonstrates that first-century Jewish tradition preserved the belief that Israel fulfilled Joseph’s dying wish. 2. Rabbinic Tradition: Later rabbinic writings also affirm that Joseph’s remains were carried by Moses. For instance, in the Talmud (e.g., Sotah 13a), there is a discussion of Moses searching for Joseph’s coffin in the Nile before the departure from Egypt. Though these writings were compiled centuries after the purported event, they reflect an ongoing conviction within the Jewish community that the oath made to Joseph was indeed honored. Evidence for a Tomb in Shechem 1. Traditional Identification of Joseph’s Tomb: There is a longstanding tradition within Judaism and among locals in the region of Shechem (near modern-day Nablus) of revering a particular site as Joseph’s tomb. This site is noted by Christian pilgrims, Jewish travelers, and local inhabitants alike. 2. Early Christian Sources: Church historian Eusebius (4th century AD) and other post-biblical writers frequently reference a tomb in Shechem associated with Joseph. Although these references come many centuries after Joseph’s era, they underscore that the tradition of Joseph’s burial location was strongly preserved in the region’s collective memory. 3. Later Pilgrimage Accounts: Medieval and later-era pilgrim accounts also mention the tomb’s location in Shechem. Although these do not serve as contemporary eyewitness testimony for the initial burial transaction, they do highlight an unbroken reverence for the site, tying it back to the biblical narrative. Archaeological Considerations 1. Lack of Direct Excavations of Joseph’s Bones: Although various archaeological projects have taken place in and around Shechem, no definitive physical discovery of bones verified as Joseph’s has been reported. This is not unusual given the complexities and disturbances of ancient burial sites. 2. Cultural Context of Honoring Ancestral Remains: Within the ancient Near Eastern setting, carrying the bones of significant ancestors to their promised homeland was not an uncommon practice. Archaeological parallels exist where families transported remains to ancestral burial sites. This custom aligns well with Israelite practices described in Genesis and Exodus. 3. Preservation of Oral and Written Tradition: Given the strong convergence of textual tradition (biblical and post-biblical Jewish writings), the consistent identification of Shechem as Joseph’s final resting place stands unique. It suggests a deep-seated cultural memory that adds plausibility to the view that Joseph’s bones were indeed transported out of Egypt and buried in Canaan. Historical Plausibility of the Practice 1. Egyptian Customs about Departing Bodies: Although Egyptian burial culture placed enormous importance on preserving bodies (e.g., mummification), there are examples in other contexts of remains being transported for reburial. Joseph’s embalming (Genesis 50:26) reflects Egyptian influence, yet his wish to be buried elsewhere demonstrates a separate cultural identity linked to God’s covenant with the patriarchs. 2. Timing with the Exodus: The Book of Exodus presents a larger company leaving Egypt with haste, preparing for a journey that would eventually lead to the land of Canaan. Carrying Joseph’s remains fits the theological emphasis: they departed not merely as refugees but as heirs to promises given generations before. Conclusion While no single extrabiblical inscription has been uncovered that directly proclaims, “These are Joseph’s bones, and here is where they were carried,” several strands of evidence point to an enduring tradition—and a strong scholarly consensus in both Jewish and Christian histories—that Joseph’s request was accomplished. The biblical text in Exodus 13:19 and Joshua 24:32 is consistent with first-century historical writings (notably Josephus) and later rabbinic discussions. Moreover, the longstanding reverence for a tomb in Shechem, recognized across successive centuries, strongly suggests that the biblical claim of Joseph’s bones leaving Egypt found a real, enduring fulfillment. Hence, from available documentary sources to the cultural patterns of the ancient Near East, the promise to Joseph that his bones would be carried to the covenant land was indeed fulfilled in Israel’s history. No direct, datable inscription or archaeological find explicitly confirms the transport of Joseph’s bones, but the convergence of biblical, historical, and traditional evidence supports the reliability of the scriptural narrative—standing as a meaningful testament to the continuity between Joseph’s words in Genesis and their careful execution generations later. |
    |