How long did Jehoiachin reign? (2 Kings 24:8 vs. 2 Chronicles 36:9) Historical and Textual Context Jehoiachin, also known as Jeconiah or Coniah (Jeremiah 22:24), was a king of Judah at a tumultuous time shortly before the final destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians. His brief reign is attested in multiple Old Testament passages as well as in Babylonian documents referencing his subsequent exile (cf. Babylonian ration tablets noting “Yaukin, king of the land of Judah”). When comparing 2 Kings 24:8 with 2 Chronicles 36:9 in many English translations, questions arise regarding both his age and the precise duration of his reign. According to the Berean Standard Bible, 2 Kings 24:8 reads: “Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. His mother’s name was Nehushta daughter of Elnathan, from Jerusalem.” 2 Chronicles 36:9 in the Berean Standard Bible states: “Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months and ten days. And he did evil in the sight of the LORD.” In most modern critical editions and in the Hebrew manuscripts behind them, the Chronicler’s record aligns with 2 Kings in giving Jehoiachin’s age as eighteen. However, some English translations (including certain printings of the King James Version) render 2 Chronicles 36:9 as “eight years old,” highlighting a scribal variant. Simultaneously, for the duration of the reign, Chronicles adds an extra detail of “ten days,” whereas 2 Kings simply records “three months.” Below is an exploration of these two questions—(1) Jehoiachin’s age, and (2) the exact length of his reign—and how they have been addressed within reliable textual and historical scholarship. Variations in Jehoiachin’s Age 1. Manuscript Evidence Numerous Hebrew manuscripts, as well as the major ancient translations (e.g., the Septuagint), overwhelmingly support “eighteen” in 2 Chronicles 36:9, consistent with 2 Kings 24:8. The majority text tradition and modern critical texts thus read “eighteen” in both places. Certain manuscripts or versions contain “eight,” but these represent a known scribal variation. Copyists occasionally wrote one character in place of another, leading to discrepancies between “eight” (שְׁמֹנֶה) and “eighteen” (שְׁמֹנֶה עֶשְׂרֵה) when copying ancient Hebrew texts. 2. Contextual Clues Second Kings 24:8 and 2 Chronicles 36:9 both describe Jehoiachin as doing “evil in the sight of the LORD.” Given the cultural milieu and the responsibilities of a king, it is more historically and contextually coherent that Jehoiachin was eighteen. This age allowed him to have a measure of agency in his rule, contrasted with the implausibility that a child of eight acted independently as king. 3. Resolution of the Variant Because the oldest, most consistent manuscripts of 2 Chronicles 36:9 match 2 Kings 24:8 in stating he was “eighteen,” the best-supported conclusion is that Jehoiachin legitimately began his reign around late adolescence. Hence, any English translation or manuscript tradition indicating “eight” in 2 Chronicles 36:9 stems from a copying or textual error—an instance well known to biblical textual critics who compare, weigh, and verify manuscripts. These critics, relying on principles similar to those used in classical textual studies, show that the weight of manuscript evidence strongly supports “eighteen.” Differences in the Recorded Reign Length 1. Three Months vs. Three Months and Ten Days 2 Kings 24:8 simply states: “He reigned in Jerusalem three months.” Meanwhile, 2 Chronicles 36:9 notes the slightly extended expression: “He reigned in Jerusalem three months and ten days.” Rather than conflict, these passages reflect a difference in the level of precision. It is analogous to certain chronological records elsewhere in Scripture, where one source may use round numbers and another gives more exact details. 2. Possible Accounting Methods Ancient chronology sometimes counted partial months as a full month or observed the beginning of a reign at a particular lunar or civil date. The Chronicler’s “ten days” could be capturing the length “beyond” three months—likely noted from an official date of enthronement to a final date of deposition under Nebuchadnezzar. Second Kings’ statement can be understood as a rounded duration, which was acceptable for succinct historical summaries. 3. Historical and Archaeological Confirmation The Babylonian Chronicles (published in translations and scholarly works on cuneiform inscriptions) mention Nebuchadnezzar capturing Jerusalem and installing Zedekiah in Jehoiachin’s stead. Coupled with the ration tablets discovered near the Ishtar Gate in Babylon, which list provisions for Jehoiachin during his captivity, these external sources confirm that Jehoiachin’s rule in Jerusalem was indeed very short, well under a year. The difference between three months or three months and ten days does not undermine the historical reliability; it is simply a more precise notation in Chronicles compared to the succinct record in Kings. Synthesis and Theological Implication 1. Reasonable Harmonization The simplest explanation is that both accounts are true: he was eighteen, and his reign lasted approximately three months, with Chronicles specifying an additional ten days. This harmonization is consistent with the broader biblical narrative and with the Hebrew text as recognized by the best manuscript sources. 2. Consistency with the Biblical Record Scripture, when carefully examined, shows remarkable internal coherence. Textual variants do occur, yet they are typically minor and well documented through comparative manuscript analysis. Even small variants like “eight” instead of “eighteen” do not undermine doctrinal teachings or the substantive history recorded. Rather, they highlight the importance of careful textual criticism in verifying the original readings (cf. the principles of modern textual scholarship). 3. Practical Takeaway From a faith perspective, Jehoiachin’s short-lived reign and subsequent exile illustrate a moment of Judah’s judgment and captivity, consistent with the prophetic warnings given throughout the Old Testament (e.g., Jeremiah’s prophecies). Although he reigned only a few months, God’s overarching plan continued, eventually leading to the return from exile under figures like Zerubbabel, who appears in the genealogies of the Messiah (cf. Matthew 1:12). This continuity underscores the gracious design of salvation history. Conclusion The question of how long Jehoiachin reigned can be definitively answered by noting that he reigned roughly three months, with 2 Chronicles adding the detail of “ten days.” The age discrepancy found in some English translations of 2 Chronicles 36:9 (eight vs. eighteen) is a clear case of scribal variation. The consistent witness of the best Hebrew manuscripts, the historical context, and the recognition that both accounts accurately describe a very brief reign all show that he was indeed eighteen. As confirmed by biblical internally consistent testimony and external Babylonian records, there is no genuine contradiction: Jehoiachin’s short administration of about three months (plus or minus ten days) is both historically and textually sound. |
    |