In Acts 7:16, Stephen says Abraham bought a burial place in Shechem, yet Genesis 33:19 credits Jacob with that purchase. Which account is correct? Historical Background The region of Shechem (modern-day Tell Balata) is notable throughout the biblical narrative. Archaeological investigations have identified massive fortifications and defensive walls dating back to the Middle Bronze Age (circa 1900–1550 BC), which aligns with the eras of the patriarchs. Ancient inscriptions and references from Egyptian execration texts (circa 19th–18th century BC) mention Shechem, supporting the city’s prominence at the time Abraham’s family could have lived in Canaan. Scripture frequently mentions Shechem as a significant location: Jacob settled there (Genesis 33:18–20), Joseph’s bones were later buried there (Joshua 24:32), and it appears in covenant-related contexts (Joshua 8:30–35; 24:1–28). This helps illustrate how Shechem was central to the patriarchal narratives and Israel’s early history. Biblical Accounts of the Purchase In Genesis 33:19, Jacob is credited with purchasing a plot of land in Shechem: “And from the sons of Hamor, Shechem’s father, he purchased for a hundred pieces of silver the plot of ground where he had pitched his tent.” Later, in Acts 7:16, Stephen, summarizing Israel’s patriarchal history, states: “They were carried back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought for a sum of silver from the sons of Hamor in Shechem.” At first reading, this seems to ascribe to Abraham a purchase elsewhere credited to Jacob, raising the question of which account is correct. Reconciling the Purchases 1. Multiple Acquisitions Within the Family Line Scripture explicitly records that Abraham purchased the cave of Machpelah in Hebron (Genesis 23:16–20). That site served as a family burial place for Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, Leah, and later Jacob. Genesis does not explicitly say Abraham purchased land in Shechem; however, it was common in ancient Semitic cultures for a family or clan’s property to be attributed to the patriarchal head. Thus, when Stephen mentions a tomb in Shechem that “Abraham had bought,” it can reflect the familial claim that originated with Abraham’s overall right to inhabit Canaan—deeded to him and his descendants by divine promise (Genesis 17:8). 2. A Summarized Reference by Stephen Stephen’s sermon in Acts 7 moves quickly through numerous patriarchal events, often summarizing entire narratives. He combines the theme of the patriarchs’ burial sites to emphasize God’s faithfulness across generations. Some suggest Stephen’s wording may encompass the idea that the entire family’s tomb—eventually located in Shechem—fell under Abraham’s initially promised land. Since Jacob had physically purchased it, Stephen still ties that ancestral burial to Abraham as the founding father. 3. Written Transmission and Attributive Language In the ancient world, “attribution” could extend from a direct purchaser to the patriarchal figure. Even if Jacob was the one who finalized the purchase with silver at Shechem, the property was within the broader inheritance promised to Abraham (Genesis 12:7; 17:8). When Stephen says Abraham “bought” the tomb, he may be linking that entire process—promise, inheritance, and land acquisition—to Abraham as head of the covenant family. Historical and Manuscript Considerations 1. Manuscript Consistency Existing Greek manuscripts of Acts 7:16 do not present significant textual variants suggesting a copying error. Scholars such as Dr. Dan Wallace and others have examined the phrase regarding Abraham and the sons of Hamor, concluding that the earliest manuscripts agree Stephen mentioned Abraham. There is no reliable ancient textual tradition that substitutes “Jacob” for “Abraham” in Acts 7:16, so the original text stands as we have it. 2. Harmonization Principles The Gospels and Acts often condense or highlight certain events for theological emphasis. Ancient historians did not always employ modern footnoting or disclaimers when using summarizing language. Thus, Stephen’s statement can be legitimately understood as referencing the patriarchal claim rather than a separate, direct transaction by Abraham in Shechem. 3. Archaeological Substantiation The burial customs described—purchasing a field with a cave, using it as a family tomb—reflect the practices attested in neighboring cultures of the second millennium BC. Tomb complexes discovered throughout Israel (e.g., at Hebron/Machpelah and widespread in the hill country) show these customs were well-established. Although definitive archaeological proof of the exact tomb at Shechem tied to Jacob or Abraham cannot be produced with today’s technology, the broader burial practice is consistent with biblical accounts. Theological and Practical Significance 1. Trusting Scriptural Unity Despite questions over historical details, the overarching message of Genesis 23, Genesis 33, and Acts 7 remains intact: God promised land to Abraham’s descendants, Abraham’s family took possession piece by piece, and the patriarchal burials underscored the continuity of faith across generations. Scripture consistently shows God’s unfailing covenant with those who trust in Him. 2. Examples of Faith The purchasing of burial plots by both Abraham (Machpelah) and Jacob (Shechem) testifies to their conviction that God would fulfill His promise. By investing in land—however small—the patriarchs demonstrated belief that they and their descendants belonged in Canaan, the land pledged by God. 3. Stephen’s Purpose When Stephen recounts the patriarchs’ history, he is defending that God’s redemptive plan moves consistently from Abraham’s calling, through the patriarchs, to the Messiah. Referencing Shechem and the family burial demonstrates that God’s work through Abraham’s lineage is continuous and culminates in the risen Christ. Conclusion Both accounts are correct within their respective contexts. Genesis 33:19 verifies that Jacob purchased “the plot of ground where he had pitched his tent” from the sons of Hamor in Shechem. Acts 7:16 alludes to the patriarchal claim upon the land, rooted in Abraham’s covenant promise from God. Stephen’s summary view attributes the entire inheritance to Abraham, the grandfather of Jacob, who eventually solidified the transaction. Rather than a contradiction, these details highlight how family parcels in Canaan—whether purchased by Abraham or Jacob—belonged to the covenant line established by God. The Bible’s harmony remains intact, underscoring that each detail, set in its historical and theological context, enriches faith in the trustworthiness of Scripture and in the covenant-keeping God who fulfilled His plan through the patriarchs and ultimately through Christ. |
    |