Why do moral values differ across cultures if morality comes from God? I. Definition and Scope of the Question One may observe that moral values—what various societies regard as right or wrong—differ across cultural contexts. For those who affirm that morality originates from God, this presents an apparent conundrum: how can there be cultural disagreement if a divine standard of morality exists? The purpose of this entry is to explore this question thoroughly, appealing to scriptural, historical, and philosophical data, and demonstrating that such differences do not negate God’s moral absolutes. II. God as the Source of Morality According to Scripture, God stands as the ultimate foundation and arbiter of right and wrong. Genesis 1:27 states, “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” From this truth flows the understanding that human beings, made in God’s image, possess moral capacities to recognize and respond to divine requirements. James 1:17 illuminates that every good thing ultimately traces back to God, describing Him as the giver of every good and perfect gift. While God’s moral law is constant and unchanging (cf. Psalm 119:160: “The entirety of Your word is truth, and all Your righteous judgments endure forever”), humankind’s expression of that law can vary due to factors such as cultural context, knowledge of God’s Word, and the distortion of sin. III. The Distorting Influence of Sin The biblical narrative teaches that the entrance of sin has corrupted human perception and practice of God’s moral law (Romans 5:12). Instead of living in perfect harmony with the Creator’s design, humanity struggles under the burden of a fallen nature. This is evidence from the very beginning of human history, seen in events such as Cain killing Abel (Genesis 4:8), demonstrating a departure from God’s moral intent. Sinful tendencies lead to variations and even perversions of moral standards across societies. Romans 1:21–22 observes, “For although they knew God, they neither glorified Him as God nor gave thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking and darkened in their foolish hearts. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools.” This departure from glorifying God has contributed to divergent moral systems in diverse cultures. IV. Conscience and Innate Moral Awareness Despite cultural differences, Scripture teaches that every person has some measure of innate awareness of God’s moral expectations. Romans 2:14–15 explains, “Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law, since they show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts either accusing or defending them.” This passage underscores that, though they may not possess the full revelation of God’s commands, all people demonstrate an intrinsic moral awareness. The differences in how this awareness surfaces across cultures can stem from levels of biblical knowledge, societal norms, rituals, and traditions that shape moral expression. Yet the inherent moral seed—imprinted by God—remains present in every human conscience. V. Cultural Expressions and Relative Emphases Although God’s moral law is absolute, different societies can highlight particular moral values over others, giving rise to seemingly disparate moral codes. Anthropologists have noted that while multiple cultures affirm virtues like honesty, loyalty, and compassion, the way these virtues manifest can vary. For example, a tribal community might have strict taboos related to hospitality or loyalty to kin, while a cosmopolitan urban culture emphasizes honesty in business contracts. This does not mean moral law is subjective; rather, it reflects varying applications of universal principles according to local customs and situational contexts. In the realm of archaeological and historical inquiry, tablets such as the Code of Hammurabi (c. 18th century BC) reveal certain parallels with biblical laws, showcasing how even ancient societies had moral prescriptions resembling biblical righteousness in some respects. These glimmers of shared moral awareness can be viewed as echoes of the law God inscribed on human hearts—even if those cultures lacked the fullness of God’s revelation. VI. The Role of Knowledge, Revelation, and Human Free Will Given that God grants humans free will, individuals and entire nations may resist or suppress divine truth (cf. Romans 1:18). This partially explains how deviations from God’s standards arise. Further, some cultures have had less access to the specific teachings of Scripture, lacking a comprehensive revelation of God’s law. Nevertheless, God’s moral reality remains consistent. Jesus taught, “From everyone who has been given much, much will be required” (Luke 12:48). Societies or individuals with abundant knowledge of God’s commandments carry greater responsibility to live in accordance with them. Where knowledge is limited, God’s grace operates alongside the moral conscience that He engraves on every human heart. VII. Reconciling Apparent Contradictions in Moral Codes Apparent contradictions in cultural moral codes often arise from misunderstanding or incomplete revelation, rather than an actual conflict with God’s enduring moral standards. By examining various societies, we frequently discover underlying principles shared across humanity—values such as preserving life, maintaining social harmony, and caring for the vulnerable. Sin distorts and may redirect these desires, creating moral practices at odds with the divine ideal. Yet the profound similarities across even disparate cultures point back to a Creator who endowed all people with moral perception. VIII. Historical and Biblical Evidence of God’s Moral Law Throughout history, God has revealed His moral will in ways accessible to humanity: 1. Scriptural Records: From the Old Testament Law given at Mount Sinai to the teachings of Christ and the Apostles, a consistent moral framework emerges. Archaeological discoveries such as the Dead Sea Scrolls confirm that these moral codes have been faithfully transmitted over centuries. 2. Natural Revelation: Psalm 19:1 attests, “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of His hands.” Through the created order, people can discern God’s reality and, by extension, perceive a sense of moral law. 3. Eyewitness Accounts and Early Church Writings: Documents from the earliest centuries of the Christian faith (e.g., extant letters from Church Fathers citing scriptural moral principles) verify that believers universally held to an unchanging ethical core. IX. Philosophical Considerations Philosophers through the ages have grappled with how societies diverge in ethical codes. Christian philosophers respond that objective morality does exist, rooted in an unchanging God, but individuals and communities can misinterpret or suppress it. Relativistic philosophies claim moral values are entirely cultural constructs. Yet the universality of certain core moral principles (e.g., prohibitions against murder or injustice) supports the biblical premise of an absolute moral standard, tarnished but not eradicated, by sin. X. Conclusion Although moral values can appear quite divergent across cultures, this diversity does not invalidate God’s objective moral law. Scripture consistently teaches that God is the source of all moral truth, that He has stamped His law on human hearts, and that sin has led to variations and distortions. Cultural differences thus emerge from factors such as dispersed knowledge of God’s Word, the presence of sin in human hearts, free will, and unique societal emphases. At the core, all people possess a conscience that resonates with the moral character of God. When examined closely, diverse moral systems bear unmistakable traces of divine design pointing back to the Creator. The deeper we go into Scripture, prayer, and the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the clearer it becomes that morality’s true origin is in God, and cultural divergences reflect humanity’s fallen condition rather than the absence of a universal moral standard. |
    |