Job 40:17: If “Behemoth” truly has a tail like a cedar, why do some translations or commentators equate it with a hippopotamus or elephant, which clearly have short tails? Overview and Purpose Job 40:17 in the Berean Standard Bible reads: “He stiffens his tail like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are tightly knit.” The majestic imagery of a creature with a strong, towering tail stands out. Yet, certain translations or commentaries equate Behemoth with animals like the hippopotamus or the elephant. This entry examines how this identification arose, why there is debate over the “tail like a cedar,” and how the passage can be understood in light of Scripture’s consistency and broader historical and scientific contexts. Scriptural Context of Job 40 In Job 40, God responds to Job’s confusion by pointing to the grandeur of the created order. The chapter highlights two extraordinary creatures—Behemoth (Job 40:15–24) and Leviathan (Job 41)—to underscore the might and wisdom of the Creator compared to human limitation. In verse 17, the specific mention that Behemoth “stiffens his tail like a cedar” becomes a central clue in understanding the creature’s identity. 1. The broader theme of Job 38–42 emphasizes God’s sovereignty and creative power. 2. These chapters employ physical descriptions of both natural and seemingly formidable creatures that elicit reverence. 3. The reference to the tail’s size or strength is deliberate, meant to emphasize Behemoth’s imposing nature. Why Some Equate Behemoth with a Hippopotamus or Elephant Historically, various Bible translations and commentaries have suggested the hippopotamus or elephant as the likely identity of Behemoth. 1. Ancient Translations and Early Commentary • Some early interpreters (including certain Jewish and Christian scholars) saw the hippo or elephant as obvious candidates for massive beasts found along rivers. • The Septuagint and Latin Vulgate translations sometimes rendered the description in a way that leans toward known large land animals of the Near Eastern and African regions. 2. Habitat Over Tail Description • Job 40:23–24 notes that Behemoth can stand unperturbed in a flooding river. Elephants and hippos certainly spend time in or near rivers, supporting this identification. • Emphasis on “under the lotus plants he lies” (Job 40:21) aligns with the watery habitat common to hippos. 3. Consensus Based on Familiarity • Many commentators in earlier generations simply chose among known large animals. Dinosaurs or extinct species were not always considered possibilities in mainstream scholarly discussion centuries ago. • The short tail of the hippo or elephant was not always viewed as a literal conflict with the “cedar” imagery; some thought the “tail” metaphor might relate to overall strength or trunk (in the elephant’s case). Examining the “Tail Like a Cedar” Imagery Scripturally, the “cedar” simile is striking. Cedars (commonly the Cedars of Lebanon) were famed in biblical lands for significant height and robust trunks. To call a creature’s tail “like a cedar” naturally brings to mind something long, thick, and powerful. 1. Literal Strength and Size • A hippopotamus or elephant has a relatively short, thin tail when compared to a full-grown cedar tree. • Some interpreters contend the text refers to a thick, powerful trunk (in the case of an elephant). However, the Hebrew text of Job 40:17 (and all standard translations, including the) clearly uses the word for “tail” (Heb. זָנָב, zanab). 2. Consistency with Other Passages • Throughout Scripture, analogies are typically employed in ways consistent with common observation. For instance, references to cedars elsewhere (e.g., Psalm 92:12, “The righteous will flourish like a palm tree and grow like a cedar in Lebanon”) emphasize their height and grandeur. • Applying this same style of analogy to a “tail” strongly suggests something huge and commanding. 3. Considering Alternate Creatures • Those who question the hippopotamus/elephant interpretation point out that neither has a tail remotely fitting the image of a tall, thick cedar. • Hippopotamus tails are short and thin, roughly the size of a stout rope, and elephants have short, rope-like tails that do not match cedar imagery. Possible Explanations for the Traditional Identification Despite what appears to be a contradictory description, some commentators continue to uphold the hippo or elephant identification. Possible reasons include: 1. Cultural Familiarity • Hippos and elephants were prominent in the Nile region, close enough to the historical setting of Job for interpreters to assume these known animals were in view. • Ancient peoples, even if they recognized the oddity of the “cedar” reference, might have considered it an exaggerated comparison. 2. Figurative Language Argument • A minority holds that “like a cedar” could be figurative language indicating general strength or fortitude rather than literal shape or length. • However, the text’s plain reading seems to point to a literal comparison of mass and power. 3. Timeline and Lost Knowledge • Over the centuries, certain descriptions might have been reinterpreted based on the assumption that Scripture only concerns extant modern animals. • If an animal no longer observed or rarely encountered fit the text more precisely, it could have been overlooked historically. Alternative Identifications Beyond Hippos and Elephants The question of Behemoth’s tail has led some scholars, particularly in contexts that allow for extinct or lesser-known creatures, to explore other identifications. 1. Large Dinosaur-Like Creatures • Some point to sauropods (e.g., Brachiosaurus or Diplodocus) that possessed massive tails capable of being described “like a cedar.” • While debates exist in mainstream science about timelines, those who hold to a young-earth viewpoint see this as consistent with the text’s emphasis on a colossal, powerful tail. 2. Possible Extinct Mammals • There were also megafaunal species in ancient times (e.g., certain giant rhinoceroses or other large mammals) that had robust frames. • However, even those appear to lack a truly cedar-like tail. 3. Integration with Ancient Testimonies • Anecdotal historical records, cave paintings, or carvings in various parts of the world (though contested by some) depict creatures with large tails or reptilian features that do not match common modern fauna. • Arguments that humans and these creatures coexisted remain debated, but they are presented as potential evidence that the text of Job could indeed reference a now-extinct animal. Archaeological and Historical Considerations While direct “Behemoth” fossils remain elusive because the text does not specify the creature’s exact species, relevant archaeological and historical observations can be brought into the conversation: 1. Depictions of Large Animals in Antiquity • Ancient engravings, such as certain petroglyphs found in regions of Africa or Asia, in some cases show large, long-tailed beasts that do not match known local wildlife. • Critics suggest these might be symbolic creatures, yet they show that large, formidable animals with distinct tail features existed in visual memory. 2. Fossil Discoveries • The discovery of massive dinosaur fossils in layers that many interpret as post-Flood or near-Flood sediment (from a young-earth viewpoint) can be seen as indicative that humans may have encountered these creatures at some stage. • Although mainstream dating methods place dinosaurs millions of years before humans, an alternate timeline drawn from certain readings of Genesis suggests overlap—consistent with the tail description in Job 40:17. 3. Consistency of Manuscript Evidence • The Book of Job is among the oldest biblical writings by many scholarly reckonings, showing internal consistency in its descriptions. • Hebrew manuscripts of Job are remarkably uniform, pointing to a carefully preserved text that accurately conveys the original depiction of Behemoth. Reliability of Scripture and Implications The portrayal of Behemoth’s tail “like a cedar” is one instance among countless other descriptive details throughout Scripture that align to showcase both poetic beauty and factual aspects of creation. 1. Manuscript Integrity • Extensive research on the ancient Hebrew texts reinforces that any scribal variations normally do not alter key descriptive elements. • This textual stability offers confidence that the original author intended to convey a remarkably large tail. 2. Historical Cohesion • Archaeological excavations repeatedly confirm the existence of locations (such as Ur, Nineveh, Hittite territories, and others) mentioned within the same general biblical corpus, lending trust to the text’s historical reliability. • Though Behemoth’s exact species is heavily debated, the narrative stands within a cohesive body of texts accurately transmitting historical, cultural, and natural information. 3. Supporting a Creator’s Power and Design • Whether the creature is recognized among modern animals or one extinct, the description underscores a being crafted with purpose and majesty. • By highlighting Behemoth, Job 40 points to the Creator’s ability to design and sustain life, a message echoed throughout Scripture about an eternal God who stands above creation. How the Question Informs Our Understanding of Behemoth The question—why translations or commentators still opt for the hippo or elephant despite the cedar-like tail—reflects broader interpretive challenges: 1. Literal vs. Figurative Language • Readers must discern when Scripture is using hyperbole vs. fact. Yet the plain meaning often takes primacy if the context suggests a literal comparison (as in the case of a “tail like a cedar”). 2. Reception History • Over many generations, commentaries pass down traditional identifications. Objections from textual details can be underemphasized if the interpretation has become culturally entrenched. 3. Openness to Possibilities • A careful study of Job needs to be open to the possibility that Behemoth is a creature we do not commonly see today or that is now extinct. • The majestic description in Job 40 invites modern readers to appreciate not just ancient commentary, but the breadth of evidence—biblical, archaeological, and otherwise—that speaks to the wonder of creation. Conclusion The “tail like a cedar” description in Job 40:17 directly challenges the notion that Behemoth might merely be a hippopotamus or elephant, given their comparatively small tails. Traditional identifications probably arose from familiarity with large living animals synonymous with river habitats, rather than literal alignment with every detail in Scripture. However one interprets the specifics, the passage serves to magnify the power and craftsmanship of the Creator. The biblical text stands reliable, preserved, and thematically cohesive throughout its manuscripts, highlighting a creature so majestic as to force us to consider the Maker who formed it. Job 40 urges every reader to humbly acknowledge that God’s designs surpass our human understanding, inviting deeper respect and awe for the One who “stiffens his tail like a cedar.” |
    |