If the Bible is divinely preserved, why is the letter mentioned in Colossians 4:16 (addressed to Laodicea) missing? I. The Question of the “Missing” Letter Colossians 4:16 states: “After this letter has been read among you, have it read in the church of the Laodiceans as well. And you, in turn, read the letter from Laodicea.” Many wonder why a letter explicitly mentioned in Scripture is not present in the accepted New Testament canon. This inquiry touches on the doctrines of divine preservation, the nature of the biblical canon, and the historical transmission of ancient texts. The mention of a letter “from Laodicea” prompts several questions: Was Paul’s epistle to Laodicea preserved elsewhere under a different name? Was the letter lost? If Scripture is divinely preserved, how could a document Paul referenced seemingly vanish? These points are often raised as potential objections to the doctrine of biblical inspiration and divine providence in preserving God’s word. II. Historical Context of Paul’s Letters Paul wrote multiple letters to different churches in the region of Asia Minor (modern-day Turkey). Among these were his letters to the congregations in Galatia, Ephesus, and Colossae. Though each local assembly had unique circumstances and pastoral needs, it was common practice for early churches to share Pauline letters among themselves. In Colossae, Paul requests that the believers not only read his letter but also ensure that “the letter from Laodicea” be read as well. This instruction shows how letters were circulated, copied, and delivered across distances. Church gatherings would read them aloud to instruct and unify believers in correct doctrine. The call for mutual exchange underscores the communal nature of early Christian teaching, where important writings passed from one congregation to another to edify all. III. Circulation and Copying of Early Letters Paul’s letters did not remain in a vacuum. In the first century, written documents required careful, manual reproduction on materials like papyrus. Letters often circulated to multiple towns, where they were copied and shared further. For instance, Colossians was addressed to the believers in Colossae, yet Paul instructed them to make sure the Laodiceans also heard it. This practice brings clarity to why Paul wanted the “letter from Laodicea” read in Colossae. Some interpret this phrase to mean a letter Paul sent to Laodicea that happened to be in Laodicea’s possession. Others suggest it might have been another circular letter—perhaps Ephesians—that reached Laodicea on its journey before making its way through nearby churches. Early church historian Eusebius, among others, commented on the practice of letters being passed around, noting that various assemblies would read and copy what they considered authoritative. IV. Inspiration, Preservation, and Canon The doctrine of divine preservation teaches that God faithfully preserves His word so that believers have a reliable and truthful testimony of salvation and instruction (cf. Psalm 119:89 and Matthew 24:35). However, divine preservation does not require that every writing produced by apostles or prophets survive in the biblical canon. Rather, it means that everything God intended for His people’s perpetual instruction has been providentially kept throughout history. Colossians 4:16 does confirm a letter associated with Laodicea existed in Paul’s time, but Scripture never explicitly claims that every apostolic communication must reside in the New Testament. Indeed, 2 Corinthians 2:4 references another “tearful letter,” and the reference in 1 Corinthians 5:9 suggests a previous epistle. Not all of these have been recovered—yet the corpus of Scripture deemed canonical is sufficient for “teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). V. Possible Explanations for the “Letter from Laodicea” 1. A Circular Letter Possibly Known as “Ephesians.” One theory widely discussed among biblical scholars is that what Paul calls “the letter from Laodicea” may be what we now call the Book of Ephesians. Ephesians appears to lack explicit references to local circumstances, which is uncharacteristic of Paul’s letters addressed to a singular congregation. This suggests it may have been a circular letter, originally meant to travel through churches like Ephesus, Laodicea, and elsewhere. Internal evidence from the ancient manuscripts indicates that the phrase “in Ephesus” in Ephesians 1:1 was missing in some early copies, possibly hinting it was intended for multiple assemblies. Thus, some hold that the letter that ended up in Laodicea and then was forwarded to Colossae could have been this circular letter. 2. A Letter Not Preserved (or Lost). Another possibility is that the letter was genuinely distinct from Ephesians, existed for a time, but did not survive. If so, it may simply mean this letter was not intended to be part of the permanent biblical canon—a claim consistent with the doctrine that God preserves everything meant to be part of Scripture. While it would have been valid, instructive, and God-inspired for that local context, God did not include it in the final canon. 3. The Apocryphal “Epistle to the Laodiceans.” There is a later text known as the Epistle to the Laodiceans appearing in some Latin manuscripts from the fourth century onward. It was almost unanimously rejected by early church leaders who recognized it did not reflect Paul’s authentic style or theology. Modern scholars generally classify it as a forgery. It is brief, repetitive, and largely a compilation of Pauline phrases from other letters. The universal rejection of this apocryphal work undergirds why it never entered the biblical canon. VI. God’s Providence in Canon Formation and Transmission The early churches used criteria to discern which apostolic writings were inspired: apostolic authorship or endorsement, usage among early churches, doctrinal consistency, and widespread acceptance by believers who traced their teachings directly to Christ’s original apostles. Documents that met these criteria were recognized as canonical, while others were excluded. Over time, the Holy Spirit guided the church’s recognition of the texts that bore God’s full authority. Manuscript evidence—such as the vast catalog of papyri, uncials, and ancient translations—shows that the letters we now possess were carefully preserved and widely attested. The letter “from Laodicea,” if it was distinct, was either spiritually encompassed by another text (like the circular Ephesians) or was not meant to supersede what God intended as the permanent scriptural deposit. Leading figures in textual criticism (e.g., those comparing the earliest manuscripts from sources like the Bodmer Papyri and the Chester Beatty Papyri) confirm a remarkable stability in the key books recognized as canonical. The absence of a unique “Laodicean” epistle in those early collections harmonizes with the understanding that it was never a recognized part of the New Testament once the churches formalized the canon. VII. The Role of Other Apostolic Letters and Writings Colossians 4:16 does not claim that the letter addressed to Laodicea (or stored there) would constitute eternal Scripture for all believers. Paul often wrote letters for specific local reasons, as 1 Corinthians 7:1 references a letter from Corinth asking him questions. Many assume only the canonical letters survived. Yet references to other communications remind us that the apostles wrote various materials, some specific to immediate concerns and not necessarily intended for the universal church across all centuries. Still, from the earliest days in the transmission of the faith, believers have recognized that certain apostolic letters contained a deeper and eternally relevant testimony that called for their consistent preservation and sharing. Those writings, by divine orchestration, entered the recognized set of books that compose today’s New Testament. VIII. Encouragement for Faith in Scripture’s Integrity A careful analysis of historical documents, the church’s recognition of canonical writings, and the textual evidence affirm that Scripture has been preserved in line with God’s intent. Jesus Himself promised, “Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will never pass away” (Matthew 24:35), and the providence displayed in the careful copying and distribution of the New Testament shows the consistent hand of preservation. Nothing suggests that the absence of a “Laodicean” letter detracts from the completeness or reliability of the New Testament. Indeed, the doctrine of inspiration contends that God revealed exactly what would be required for His people’s instruction and salvation. Everything believers need to grow in faith, to understand the gospel, and to live out a Christ-honoring life is included in the Scriptures that the church has universally recognized. IX. Conclusion The reference to a letter from Laodicea in Colossians 4:16 does not undermine the doctrine that Scripture is divinely preserved. Multiple explanations harmonize with the fact that what we have in the New Testament is precisely what God intended to preserve. Whether this letter was essentially the same as Ephesians, a completely lost letter, or left out of the canon for reasons overseen by divine providence, there is no conflict with the integrity of Scripture. The trustworthiness of the biblical text—backed by historical, textual, and archaeological evidence—stands, and all that is necessary for teaching and faith remains included within the canon. Each recognized book continues to lead believers to the same timeless truths and transformation, upholding what Paul wrote elsewhere: “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for instruction, for conviction, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). |
    |