Why is there no external historical record of the earthquake (Matthew 28:2) or the resurrection outside of the biblical narrative? Understanding the Question The question at hand asks why there appears to be no external historical record—beyond the biblical text—of the earthquake mentioned in Matthew 28:2 or explicit accounts of the resurrection itself. Matthew 28:2 states, “Suddenly there was a great earthquake, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven, rolled away the stone, and sat on it.” This entry explores the cultural, historical, and textual context of that time period, examining why surviving sources do not feature extensive (or explicit) mention of these events outside Scripture. Historical Context of Earthquakes and Record-Keeping Ancient Judea was situated on or near fault lines running through the region, so earthquakes were not uncommon. Records of earthquakes depended heavily on the interests of local historians or government officials who chose what to preserve. Many smaller or localized earthquakes remained unrecorded, or their records have since been lost. Surviving non-biblical writings from first-century Judea are limited. Political turmoil and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD led to the loss of numerous local documents. Consequently, the absence of preserved extrabiblical attestations may be due less to the earthquake’s insignificance and more to the general destruction of local archives and the scarcity of ancient Jewish and Roman chroniclers covering provincial events. Nature of Ancient Historiography 1. Limited Chronicling of Provincial Events: Roman annals and Jewish historical works typically highlighted larger socio-political milestones (wars, imperial decrees, leadership changes). An earthquake at a tomb just outside Jerusalem might have been overlooked—especially if it had minimal broader consequences beyond that vicinity. 2. Selective Preservation: Most ancient authors wrote under the patronage of Roman elites who focused on matters affecting the empire’s power structures. Provincial religious events were not always a priority. Over centuries, only certain works survived through copying and transmission, meaning many routine or localized phenomena never made it into extant texts. 3. Religious Offense or Political Motives: Early Roman authors often had little sympathy for new religious movements. As such, they might dismiss or omit miraculous events tied to sects or religions deemed unimportant or subversive. Possible Extrabiblical References to the Resurrection Although no direct mention of the exact earthquake is found in surviving pagan or Jewish texts, there are ancient references to the earliest followers of Jesus proclaiming His resurrection: 1. Josephus’s Testimonium Flavianum (Antiquities 18.3.3) – While parts of Josephus’s account are disputed, many scholars believe it preserves at least a core mention of Jesus’ crucifixion and the subsequent claim by His disciples that He was raised. The text indicates that Jesus’ followers persisted in proclaiming Him alive. 2. Tacitus’s Annals (15.44) – Tacitus references Christians in Rome talking about Christ’s crucifixion under Pontius Pilate, showing that belief in a risen Savior had spread to Rome within decades of the event, though Tacitus does not specifically describe the resurrection details or an earthquake. 3. Early Christian Writings (e.g., 1 Clement, Ignatius of Antioch) – The earliest Christian community wrote extensively of Jesus’ resurrection. While not neutral “outside” sources, these documents are still first- or second-century evidence that the resurrection claim was widely held and central to Christian identity from the start. Although these references do not describe the earthquake itself, they demonstrate that something extraordinary happened and was fervently believed by people close to the time and place in question. Archaeological and Textual Considerations 1. Manuscript Evidence for the Gospel Accounts: Modern textual studies confirm that the Gospel of Matthew is reliably attested through thousands of ancient manuscripts in Greek, plus versions in Syriac, Coptic, and Latin. This widespread transmission indicates a strong textual tradition preserving the details of Jesus’ life as understood by early Christians—including the momentous events of the resurrection morning. 2. Geological Records and Minimal Preservation: Geologists studying sediments near the Dead Sea have found evidence of multiple seismic events around the region, although pinning down the exact year can be difficult. While these findings show ongoing seismic activity consistent with the biblical record of repeated earthquakes (e.g., Matthew 27:51, Matthew 28:2, Acts 16:26), the data do not always specify events with absolute chronological precision. 3. Selective Copying of Historical Sources: Even if local officials recorded the earthquake, many such records from Judea could have been destroyed during the Roman-Jewish conflicts, particularly the First Jewish–Roman War (66–73 AD) when Jerusalem was besieged and the Temple was destroyed. Hand-copied manuscripts needed dedicated scribes. If the details of a localized earthquake did not interest subsequent transcribers, the record might easily disappear over the centuries. Philosophical and Social Factors Impacting Witness Accounts 1. Local Shame or Fear of Rome: Some Jewish leaders might have been unwilling to preserve or circulate writings that appeared to validate the claims of Jesus’ followers, given the strong social and political controversy surrounding the new movement. 2. Religious and Cultural Barriers: Conceding to a supernatural event among critics, especially one tied to a crucified man claimed to be the Messiah, would have affected socio-political and religious frameworks. Events that reinforced Christian doctrine may have been ignored or quickly dismissed as “Christian propaganda.” 3. Nature of Miraculous Events: From a broader point of view, miracles were often kept within the testimonies of believers. Non-sympathetic sources typically did not record or validate miraculous claims, making the absence of external corroboration unsurprising in an era of deep sectarian and cultural division. Consistency with Other Biblical Miracles Just as the Red Sea crossing (Exodus 14) or the plagues in Egypt are primarily attested in Scriptural writings, many miraculous events in the Bible have scant or no independent confirmation in surviving ancient records. Mathematical probability, political or religious impetus, and the fragility of ancient documents all contribute to scarce preservation. Still, the biblical narrative has consistently been vindicated over time through archaeology (e.g., the discovery of the Pool of Bethesda in John 5:2, once thought mythical; the identification of locations like Nazareth); thus, many once-disputed details have found corroboration. Centrality of the Resurrection While the earthquake’s mention outside Scripture remains elusive, it is the resurrection itself that stands at the heart of Christian belief. Early, widespread testimony to the resurrection—among both friendly and hostile witnesses—shows the rapid growth of a movement centered on the claim that Jesus rose from the dead. From a historical perspective, a localized earthquake is a less striking factor for external chroniclers compared to the transforming claims of a resurrected Christ. Those who heard the testimony of eyewitnesses, such as the apostles, were eventually convinced even amidst opposition. It is not the absence of a direct reference to a brief seismic event that undergirds Christian faith, but the life-altering witness of people who believed they saw Jesus risen, and who would not recant under persecution. Conclusion The absence of surviving external documentation for the earthquake described in Matthew 28:2 does not negate the reliability of the biblical account. Cultural tendencies, limited preservations of localized events, and political motives shape which historical details were recorded. Throughout history, many smaller-scale occurrences went unregistered or have not survived in extant records. Meanwhile, the resurrection—though similarly lacking in direct, neutral “play-by-play” accounts—remains attested by multiple early Christian sources and alluded to by non-Christian writers who acknowledge that Jesus’ followers were fully persuaded of His resurrection. The significance of this claim reverberates through the centuries, even as large portions of the ancient record have been lost. In the end, the biblical record—transmitted in a remarkable manuscript tradition and supported by millennia of scholarship—continues to stand as the primary testimony to the miraculous quake and the risen Christ. As with many events in ancient history, preserved accounts are selective. Yet the extraordinary transformation, conviction, and rapid dissemination of the resurrection message echoes in surviving literary, archaeological, and historical evidence, making the biblical narrative a reliable beacon for those examining past events and their meaning for humanity. |
    |