---

I. THE ASTOUNDING PREROGATIVE THAT CHRIST JESUS ASSUMED. The despised and rejected man says, "The Son of Man hath power," etc., "Who can forgive sins but God only?" In the nature of things, it is only He against whom the crime is committed, it is only He whose majesty is violated, it is only He whose law is broken, that hath power to remit the penalty that He has imposed on the transgression of His law, the infringement of His majesty and the infraction of His authority. Even amongst the children of men this is held as a sacred and inalienable right; insomuch that mercy is the appropriate and inalienable prerogative of the Crown; and no subject, however exalted he may be in place or power, presumes to arrogate to himself — it would be high treason were he to arrogate to himself — the power to remit the sentence of the law. The judge may commend to mercy, the influential may interpose their interest; but it belongs to the sovereign to exercise the prerogative of the Crown, and to remit the sentence that is passed. But if this prerogative even among the children of men be inalienable, how much more must the prerogative of the King of kings and Lord of lords, who "is not a man that He should lie, nor the son of man that He should repent" — how much more must His prerogative be incommunicable, indefeasible, inalienable? "Who can forgive sins, but God only?"

II. THE EVIDENCE THAT HE GAVE in demonstration of His claim is clear as the noon-day sun, and as irresistible as the very power of God. Let us, then, see how He could substantiate so stupendous a claim as to forgive sins — all sins; forgive them in His own right, in His own name, of His own authority. The position was laid down, and the argument for its establishment was obvious. It was not intricate and dark, requiring a mighty intellect to grasp it, or a penetrating understanding to enter into its process. It was an appeal to every mall, that had an eye to see and a mind to understand.

III. THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE HUMAN NATURE OF CHRIST AND THIS WONDROUS PREROGATIVE THAT HE EXERCISED — "The Son of Man hath power on earth to forgive sins." One might have imagined that He would rather have said in this connection, "The Son of God hath power on earth to forgive sins;" for surely it was only as He was "very God of very God," that He could have wielded the sceptre of the eternal Jehovah. But there is a beautiful propriety, there is a touching and exquisite fitness, in thus designating Himself "the Son of Man." Therefore it was not simply or so much as the Son of God alone, that the Saviour had this wondrous prerogative, but as the Son of Man, who became the Surety for sinners, who took the manhood into Godhead that He might be the Daysman between His fallen brethren and His unchangeable Father — that He might put His hand on both and so make peace — that He might bring God and man to one, and yet maintain His law inviolate, His majesty unsullied, His truth unimpeached, His justice uncompromised, and all His attributes invested with a new and nobler lustre than the universe had ever before beheld, or could have entered into created mind to conceive. Therefore, brethren, it was not by a simple act of sovereignty that the Saviour forgave sins. As the Centurion said to Paul, "With a great price bought I this freedom," so with a great price the incarnate God bought the glorious and benign prerogative of forgiving sins. He bought it with His agony and blood. He bought it by His meritorious and spotless obedience — by His glorious resurrection and ascension. By all these He bought this glorious prerogative of forgiving sins. So that "we are not redeemed with corruptible things as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot." Perceive you, brethren, the momentousness and meaning of this distinction? Let me by a simple illustration make it more clear to the plainest mind. It is conceivable that when a sovereign had arrived at an age to assume the sceptre of a nation, and wished to grace his accession to the throne by some act of regal munificence and clemency, he might proclaim an universal exemption from all debts contracted by any inhabitants of that land in days gone by. It is conceivable that he might do this; but if he did so, to the wrong and robbery of all the creditors of that land, would his clemency, do you think, add to his glory? would it give any pledge of his justice, integrity, or even common honesty towards his subjects? So far from it, his clemency would be lost sight of in the injury and the wrong he had done. But if that prince, being desirous to grace his accession to the throne by an act of clemency, in which justice should likewise shine, were from his own private resources to liquidate all the debts of all those imprisoned for debt throughout the length and breadth of the land, and then throw open the prison doors, all would applaud the deed; all would admire the exercise of sovereign clemency in perfect harmony with unimpeachable justice. So, if we may venture by low and earthly things to illustrate things sublime and heavenly, the blessed Son of God, the Prince and Saviour of mankind, "exalted to give repentance unto Israel, and the remission of sins," did not set the sinful debtors free, that owed to their Father an infinite debt which they had no power to pay — which they would throughout eternity have been paying and yet had throughout eternity to pay — He did not set them free by a simple exercise of His own authority, violating the obligations of law, the demands of justice, and the claims of the unfallen portion of the subjects of an everlasting Father. But He paid the debt; He became Surety, and He met the claim; He paid it to the uttermost farthing, till He could say with His expiring breath, "It is finished" — till He had "finished transgression, made an end of sin and brought in everlasting righteousness." The Father, well pleased in the full expiation accomplished by the Son, delights to forgive through that Saviour's name — "for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Christian brethren, if the Son of Man had "power on earth to forgive sins," how much more, if it be possible, hath He power in heaven to forgive sins?

(H. Stowell, M. A.)

---

---

KJV: Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?

WEB: "Why does this man speak blasphemies like that? Who can forgive sins but God alone?"