3267

Lexical Summary

(Not Used): (Not Used)

(Not Used)
Part of Speech:
Transliteration: (Not Used)
(Not Used)

Topical Lexicon

Strong’s Indexing Context

The number 3267 appears in the Strong’s system as a placeholder rather than an active dictionary entry. The gap should not be viewed as an error but as an intentional part of James Strong’s cross-referencing method. During compilation, some lexical items were removed or merged, yet their assigned numbers remained in sequence so that earlier concordances, commentaries, and margin notes would still match. Thus, Strong’s 3267 reminds the careful reader that the numbering system itself is secondary to the inspired text it serves.

Absence from the Greek New Testament

Because the underlying word never occurs in any extant manuscript of the Greek New Testament, 3267 carries no direct exegetical data for translators or expositional preachers. The silence is instructive: not every conceivable vocabulary item was chosen by the Holy Spirit when moving the biblical authors to write. This underscores the perfection of Scripture’s wording. What is present is exactly what God intended; what is absent is likewise purposeful (John 21:25; Revelation 22:18-19).

Relationship to the Septuagint and Extra-Biblical Greek

No certain occurrences of the form assigned to 3267 have been discovered in the Septuagint or in classical Greek literature. Although various lexicons sometimes conjecture cognate roots, none are universally accepted. Consequently, students cannot strengthen word studies by moving to the Greek Old Testament or to contemporary Hellenistic writings. The safest course is to acknowledge that there is presently no inspired usage to analyze, and therefore no doctrine can be built on this unattested term (Deuteronomy 29:29).

Theological Reflection on Scriptural Gaps

1. Canonical Sufficiency: The absence of 3267 illustrates that Scripture is sufficient without including every possible expression (2 Peter 1:3).
2. Providential Preservation: God not only inspired the words but also preserved them; unused or lost forms highlight the distinction between revelation and later linguistic speculation (Psalm 12:6-7).
3. Hermeneutical Caution: When a Strong’s number lacks biblical occurrences, interpreters must resist the urge to supply meaning from later secular sources or imaginative etymologies (1 Timothy 1:4).

Implications for Pastoral Ministry

• Preachers should focus on words that actually appear in the inspired text, guarding the flock against unfounded linguistic theories.
• Teachers can use the gap to demonstrate how concordances function, encouraging believers to depend on Scripture itself rather than on secondary tools.
• Apologists may point to unused numbers as evidence of the meticulous, historically transparent process behind English Bible aids, reinforcing confidence that no verses or words have been hidden or removed.

Application for Personal Study

When encountering 3267 in a concordance or software package, the student should:

1. Note its absence and move on to passages where the biblical authors speak clearly.
2. Use the moment to thank God for the clarity and completeness of the canonical text (Psalm 119:105).
3. Remember that true growth in grace comes not from speculative linguistics but from embracing the plainly revealed Word (James 1:22).

Conclusion

Strong’s 3267 is a numerical signpost without lexical content. While it adds nothing directly to Greek word studies, it quietly teaches the believer to value the exact words God has preserved, to exercise caution in handling linguistic resources, and to rest in the sufficiency of the Scriptures that are written.

Englishman's Concordance

μελῶν — 2 Occ.
μέλος — 5 Occ.
Μελχὶ — 2 Occ.
Μελχισεδέκ — 8 Occ.
ἔμελεν — 2 Occ.
μέλει — 7 Occ.
μελέτω — 1 Occ.
μεμβράνας — 1 Occ.
μέμφεται — 1 Occ.
μεμφόμενος — 1 Occ.
μὲν — 182 Occ.
Μενοῦν — 1 Occ.
μενοῦνγε — 2 Occ.
μέντοι — 8 Occ.
ἐμείναμεν — 2 Occ.
ἔμειναν — 2 Occ.
ἔμεινεν — 10 Occ.
ἔμενεν — 3 Occ.
ἔμενον — 1 Occ.
μεῖναι — 6 Occ.