Strong's Greek: 3275 -- (Not Used)zzz

Lexical Summary

(Not Used): (Not Used)

(Not Used)
Part of Speech:
Transliteration: (Not Used)
(Not Used)

Topical Lexicon

Numeric Placement in Strong’s Concordance

Number 3275 sits between 3274 and 3276 in the customary numbering system created by James Strong for the purpose of indexing every form found in the Textus Receptus. Its position is therefore a purely catalog-related detail and not a reflection of canonical weight or inspiration. Because Strong reserved individual numbers for every lexical form he encountered, gaps occasionally appear where later editors judged that no distinct lemma actually belonged. 3275 is one such placeholder.

Absence from the Greek New Testament

No manuscript family—Alexandrian, Western, or Byzantine—contains this entry. Consequently, Greek critical editions (Nestle-Aland, Byzantine Majority, Textus Receptus, Patriarchal, etc.) register no occurrences. The vocabulary of the Spirit-breathed New Testament is therefore unaffected by the word indicated by 3275, and every expositor can proceed with confidence that no revelatory concept has slipped through the cracks.

Possible Witness Outside the New Testament

Neither the Septuagint’s major codices (Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus) nor early Christian writers (for example, Clement of Rome, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria) employ the form. Patristic lexicons are likewise silent. Where Classical or Hellenistic literature has been searched, nothing of certain relevance has surfaced. Most scholars conclude that Strong’s original source material contained either a scribal phantom or a marginal notation later cleared away by textual criticism.

Relationship to Adjacent Entries

Because 3275 is unused, any theological scope connected to 3274 or 3276 must be traced without assuming a missing link. The neighboring lemmas are fully attested in the New Testament; their doctrinal themes stand independently and do not rely on 3275 for syntactic or semantic support.

Theological Reflections

The absence of 3275 underscores the providential preservation of Scripture. Every word intended by God has survived, while non-canonical or accidental insertions have been pruned away through centuries of manuscript comparison. The believer is reminded of the Lord’s promise: “The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God stands forever” (Isaiah 40:8).

Implications for Word Studies

1. Concordance numbers are research tools, not inspired verse divisions.
2. A gap in the numbering does not indicate a gap in revelation.
3. Caution is required when secondary literature cites Strong’s numbers; students should verify that a cited form actually appears in the biblical text.
4. When a number proves empty, attention should shift to contextual study of the surrounding vocabulary that does occur in Scripture.

Pastoral and Ministry Application

• Protecting the flock from speculative doctrine: Teachers sometimes build novel ideas on shadowy word-study claims. Pointing out unused numbers like 3275 helps congregations see the value of sound exegetical method over creative conjecture (2 Timothy 2:15).
• Modeling intellectual honesty: Admitting that a Strong’s number yields no data reinforces transparency and humility in Bible teaching.
• Encouraging confidence in the sufficiency of Scripture: “His divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness” (2 Peter 1:3). If God did not see fit to embed a term in His Word, the church does not suffer loss.

Scholarly Importance

Text-critical apparatuses sometimes cite the removal of spurious readings as evidence against stability. In truth, the identification of unused entries such as 3275 demonstrates the precision with which copyists, editors, and translators have subjected the text to scrutiny. The process clarifies, rather than clouds, the integrity of the canon.

Concluding Observations

Strong’s number 3275 serves as a silent witness to the meticulous care exercised in both ancient transmission and modern cataloging of the biblical text. While the number itself offers no lexical treasure, it reinforces a larger testimony: the Word of God we possess today is complete, trustworthy, and fully sufficient “that the man of God may be complete, fully equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:17).

Links

Interlinear Greek • Interlinear Hebrew • Strong's Numbers • Englishman's Greek Concordance • Englishman's Hebrew Concordance • Parallel Texts