4855. mashsha
Lexical Summary
mashsha: Load, burden, tribute

Original Word: מַשָּׁא
Part of Speech: Noun Masculine
Transliteration: mashsha'
Pronunciation: mash-SHAH
Phonetic Spelling: (mash-shaw')
KJV: exaction, usury
NASB: usury, exaction
Word Origin: [from H5383 (נָשָׁה - creditor)]

1. a loan
2. (by implication) interest on a debt

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
exaction, usury

From nashah; a loan; by implication, interest on a debt -- exaction, usury.

see HEBREW nashah

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
from nasha
Definition
lending on interest, usury
NASB Translation
exaction (1), usury (2).

Brown-Driver-Briggs
מַשָּׁא noun masculineNehemiah 5:10 lending on interest, or usury; — Nehemiah 5:7 (as accusative of congnate meaning with verb), Nehemiah 5:10.

Topical Lexicon
Semantic Range and Core Idea

מַשָּׁא (mashsha) denotes an imposed financial burden that accrues through lending—what English translations usually render “interest,” “usury,” or “debt.” The term does not describe the principal of a loan but the additional amount exacted from the borrower. It therefore addresses the moral dimensions of economic relationships more than mere bookkeeping.

Occurrences in Scripture

The word appears twice, both in the memoirs of Nehemiah (Nehemiah 5:10; Nehemiah 10:31). In each case the covenant community is confronting the ethical boundaries of finance:

Nehemiah 5:10 records Nehemiah’s rebuke of wealthy Judeans who were charging interest on loans to their destitute brothers. He urges, “Let us stop this interest”, calling for immediate cessation of mashsha.
Nehemiah 10:31 forms part of a renewed covenant pledge. The people vow that “each seventh year we will forego the produce of the land and cancel every debt”. The relinquishing of mashsha becomes a practical outworking of sabbatical faith.

Historical Background

Post-exilic Judah was economically fragile. Persian taxation, crop failures, and the costs of wall-building tempted affluent Israelites to secure their wealth by lending at interest. Yet the Mosaic legislation had already forbidden such exploitation among covenant members (Exodus 22:25; Leviticus 25:35-37; Deuteronomy 23:19-20). Nehemiah therefore appeals to Torah precedent, framing mashsha as a violation not merely of social courtesy but of covenant faithfulness.

Theology of Lending and Compassion

1. Divine Ownership. Psalm 24:1 affirms, “The earth is the LORD’s.” All economic activity, therefore, is stewardship under divine oversight.
2. Brotherhood and Equality. Israel’s law treats fellow Israelites as “brothers,” not commercial opportunities. Charging mashsha to the poor contradicts this familial identity.
3. Sabbath Principle. The sabbatical year (Deuteronomy 15) resets economic disparities. Nehemiah’s commitment to cancel mashsha in the seventh year integrates social justice with worship, demonstrating that true Sabbath rest includes relief for the vulnerable.
4. Fear of God. Nehemiah 5:9 links refusal of interest to the “fear of our God,” presenting economic mercy as an act of reverence, not mere philanthropy.

Ministry Significance for Today

• Financial Ethics in the Church. Modern believers are called to practices that protect the needy from crushing debt, reflecting God’s heart revealed in the prohibition of mashsha.
• Modeling Generosity. Acts 2:44-45 shows the early church voluntarily sharing possessions, an echo of Nehemiah’s reforms.
• Sabbatical Rhythms. Contemporary observance may include debt relief programs, benevolence funds, and avoiding predatory lending—concrete expressions of gospel compassion.

Christological Reflection

Jesus Christ embodies the ultimate release from debt: “Forgive us our debts” (Matthew 6:12). On the cross He cancels the record of sin’s indebtedness (Colossians 2:14), fulfilling the deeper spiritual reality to which mashsha pointed. Thus Nehemiah’s economic reforms foreshadow the Messiah’s redemptive work, where grace cancels the impossible liability we owe to God.

Integration with the New Testament

While the New Testament does not reiterate Israel’s civil statutes, it intensifies their ethical intent. Romans 13:8 commands, “Owe no one anything, except to love each other,” capturing the spirit of mashsha-free relationships—where love, not profit, governs interactions. James 5:4 likewise condemns exploitation of laborers, reinforcing the continuity of God’s concern for economic righteousness.

Conclusion

מַשָּׁא functions as a barometer of covenant fidelity. Its rejection in Nehemiah signals revived obedience, communal solidarity, and reverence for God’s law. For the church today, the term summons believers to merciful stewardship and a counter-cultural economy shaped by the gospel of grace.

Forms and Transliterations
הַמַּשָּׁ֥א המשא וּמַשָּׁ֥א ומשא ham·maš·šā hammashSha hammaššā ū·maš·šā umashSha ūmaššā
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Nehemiah 5:10
HEB: נָּ֖א אֶת־ הַמַּשָּׁ֥א הַזֶּֽה׃
NAS: let us leave off this usury.
KJV: I pray you, let us leave off this usury.
INT: leave Please usury this

Nehemiah 10:31
HEB: הַשָּׁנָ֥ה הַשְּׁבִיעִ֖ית וּמַשָּׁ֥א כָל־ יָֽד׃
NAS: year and the exaction of every
INT: year the seventh and the exaction of every debt

2 Occurrences

Strong's Hebrew 4855
2 Occurrences


ham·maš·šā — 1 Occ.
ū·maš·šā — 1 Occ.

4854
Top of Page
Top of Page