How does 1 Chronicles 2:14 contribute to understanding the lineage of King David? Canonical Text “Nethanel the fourth, Raddai the fifth” (1 Chronicles 2:14). Placement in the Chronicler’s Genealogy 1 Chronicles 2:1–17 strings the lineage from Jacob to David, pausing on Judah’s line, then Boaz, Obed, and Jesse, finally naming Jesse’s seven sons in verses 13–15. Verse 14 sits at the center of that list, identifying Nethanel as Jesse’s fourth son and Raddai as the fifth. By specifying precise ordinal positions, the Chronicler fixes David’s location as the seventh (v. 15), a detail that complements 1 Samuel 16:10–12 where David is the youngest. This careful numbering demonstrates that David’s rise was sovereign, not sociological; he was divinely chosen despite coming last in line. Clarifying David’s Birth Order Without v. 14 the order collapses: remove “Nethanel the fourth, Raddai the fifth” and David could be miscounted. The verse therefore protects the integrity of the list and, by extension, the covenant promise attached to David (2 Samuel 7:12–16). Birth-order precision also prevents later conflation with Eliab or Abinadab in military rosters (1 Samuel 17:13). Chronicles, compiled after the exile, reassures post-exilic readers that the messianic line had never been lost or scrambled; every name was still in place. Synchronizing Cross-References • Ruth 4:18-22 traces Judah→Perez→Hezron→Boaz→Obed→Jesse→David; Chronicles fleshes out Jesse’s other sons, confirming that David’s ancestry fulfills Ruth’s closing expectation. • Matthew 1:3-6 lists the same sequence, demonstrating New Testament dependence on the older genealogical backbone preserved in 1 Chronicles. • Luke 3:31-32 reverses the order but retains David, Jesse, and Obed, proving textual consonance across centuries of transmission. Archaeological Corroboration The Tel Dan Stele (9th c. BC) reads “bytdwd” (“House of David”), an extra-biblical attestation that a dynastic line named for David existed within decades of his reign. If scribes were inventing David’s family tree centuries later, contemporaneous Aramean stone would not reflect it. Likewise, the Mesha Stele (Moabite Stone, c. 840 BC) mentions “the men of beth-david,” reinforcing geopolitical recognition of David’s lineage. Chronological Precision Using a conservative Ussher-style timeline, Judah’s trek into Egypt ends c. 1876 BC; the Exodus occurs 1446 BC; David’s reign begins 1010 BC. 1 Chronicles 2 anchors David’s appearance within this framework by linking him to fixed patriarchal and tribal milestones, allowing a coherent succession count of roughly 15 generations from Judah to David (cf. Matthew 1:17). Theological Significance 1. Covenant Continuity—Since the Messiah must come from David (Isaiah 11:1; Jeremiah 23:5), the Chronicler’s preservation of every sibling underlines God’s meticulous oversight. 2. Divine Election—By numbering David last, Scripture amplifies God’s pattern of choosing the unexpected (cf. 1 Corinthians 1:27). 3. National Identity—Post-exilic Judah needed reassurance that covenant promises were intact; verse 14 participates in that reassurance by stitching David into an unbroken familial fabric. Summary 1 Chronicles 2:14, though only ten Hebrew words, is indispensable. It: • secures David’s exact birth order, • harmonizes Samuel, Ruth, and the Gospels, • exhibits textual and archaeological reliability, • and underscores God’s covenant fidelity. Because of this tiny hinge-verse, the lineage of Israel’s greatest king—and ultimately of Christ Himself—stands unambiguous and immutable. |
    |