1 Sam 28:10 vs. Deut 18:10-12 on divination?
How does 1 Samuel 28:10 connect to Deuteronomy 18:10-12 on divination?

Setting the Scene: Saul’s Desperate Moment

1 Samuel 28 finds Saul, abandoned by prophetic revelation, turning to a medium at En-dor. Verse 10 reads:

“Then Saul swore to her by the LORD, saying, ‘As surely as the LORD lives, no punishment will come upon you for this thing.’”


Divination Condemned: Deuteronomy 18:10-12

Moses’ words are unequivocal:

“No one among you is to make his son or his daughter pass through the fire, practice divination, tell fortunes, interpret omens, practice sorcery, cast spells, consult a medium or a familiar spirit, or inquire of the dead. For whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD….”


Point-by-Point Connection

• Same LORD invoked—opposite purposes

– Deuteronomy bans occult practice; Saul calls on God’s name to protect a practitioner.

• “Detestable” vs. “No punishment”

– God labels such acts an abomination; Saul promises immunity.

• Covenant king vs. covenant law

– Saul, charged with enforcing the Law (cf. Deuteronomy 17:18-20), instead contradicts it.

• Spiritual authority inverted

– The king fears the medium’s wrath (v.9) more than God’s judgment (cf. Proverbs 29:25).


Why Saul’s Oath Is Especially Troubling

• He swears “by the LORD” (Heb. Yahweh) while facilitating what Yahweh forbids (Leviticus 19:31; Isaiah 8:19).

• Earlier he expelled mediums (1 Samuel 28:3); now he nullifies that very policy.

• He uses covenant language (“as surely as the LORD lives”) to sanctify sin, echoing the later charge in Isaiah 5:20—calling evil good.


Theological Implications

• Misusing God’s Name – The third commandment (Exodus 20:7) forbids invoking God to endorse disobedience; Saul breaks it flagrantly.

• Authority of Scripture – Deuteronomy’s prohibition still stood; no emergency overrides divine revelation (cf. Psalm 119:89).

• Sovereign Silence – God’s prior refusal to answer Saul (1 Samuel 28:6) highlights that turning to forbidden channels is not an alternate “option.”


New Testament Echoes

Acts 13:6-12 contrasts Saul’s compromise with Paul’s rebuke of Elymas the sorcerer; the apostle upholds the Deuteronomic stance.

Revelation 21:8 lists “sorcerers” among the condemned, affirming the continuity of God’s standard.


Practical Takeaways

• God’s Word, not crisis, defines right and wrong.

• Invoking spiritual language cannot legitimize disobedience.

• Spiritual desperation should drive us to repentance, not forbidden shortcuts.

What does Saul's oath reveal about his understanding of God's law?
Top of Page
Top of Page