How does 3 John 1:11 define the difference between good and evil actions? Text “Beloved, do not imitate what is evil, but what is good. The one who does good is of God; the one who does evil has not seen God.” (3 John 1:11) Literary and Historical Context The third epistle of John is a brief, personal letter from the apostle John to Gaius. John commends Gaius for hospitality, condemns Diotrephes for arrogance, and praises Demetrius for integrity (vv. 5–12). Verse 11 functions as the thesis statement: Gaius must discern between two visible patterns—good and evil—and align with the good. The letter therefore provides a living case study: Diotrephes embodies evil actions; Demetrius embodies good. The Principle of Moral Imitation John shifts ethics from abstraction to imitation. For John, morality is not merely doing; it is mirroring. Good actions flow from consciously reflecting God’s revealed character. Evil actions arise when one lacks that vision. This echoes Jesus’ words: “Truly, truly, I tell you, the Son can do nothing by Himself unless He sees the Father doing it” (John 5:19). To imitate good, therefore, is to participate in God’s own moral nature. Canonical Harmony • Good from God: “Every good gift … is from above” (James 1:17). • Evil shows blindness: “If our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing” (2 Corinthians 4:3-4). • Imitation ethic: “Be imitators of God, therefore, as beloved children” (Ephesians 5:1). Contrast: Diotrephes vs. Demetrius Diotrephes (vv. 9-10): loves preeminence, rejects apostolic authority, slanders, expels believers—practical manifestations of “kakopoiō” (evil-doing). Demetrius (v. 12): enjoys “a good testimony from everyone”—an exemplar of “agathopoiō” (good-doing). Verse 11 tells Gaius to pattern his behavior after the latter. “Has Seen God” Explained John uses “seeing” metaphorically for experiential knowledge (cf. 1 John 3:6). One who lives habitually in evil actions demonstrates that he has never been regenerated; he lacks the light that comes from knowing God (John 1:4-5). Conversely, consistent good works confirm spiritual life (Matthew 7:17-20). Moral Discernment for the Church The verse provides a test for leadership and fellowship: observe the fruit. Hospitality, submission to Scripture, and love confirm godliness; pride, slander, and exclusion reveal estrangement from God. This objective test guards the congregation from false teachers and ensures missions support only the truly faithful (vv. 5-8). Philosophical Clarification Good and evil are not co-equal forces; good is ontologically grounded in God’s nature, while evil is privation—the lack of conformity to that nature (Romans 3:23). Thus John’s dichotomy is existential: union or disunion with God determines moral quality. Practical Application 1. Choose mentors whose lives exhibit biblical good. 2. Evaluate personal conduct: recurring evil may signal spiritual blindness and need for repentance. 3. Cultivate practices—hospitality, truth, humility—that visibly reflect God’s character. 4. In missions giving, partner with workers whose actions corroborate their message. Evangelistic Appeal True good flows only from a heart transformed by Christ’s resurrection power (Romans 6:4). Turn from self-rule, believe the gospel, and you will “see God” (John 14:19)—then imitate the Son, the perfect Good. Summary 3 John 1:11 defines good actions as those springing from a regenerate relationship with God, evidenced by visible fruit, and evil actions as those arising from spiritual blindness. The verse calls believers to conscious imitation of godly examples, providing both a personal ethic and a communal safeguard. |
    |