Acts 17:23: Inclusivity vs. Exclusivity?
How does Acts 17:23 challenge the concept of religious inclusivity and exclusivity?

Text

“For as I walked around and examined your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. Therefore what you worship as something unknown, I now proclaim to you.” (Acts 17:23)


Historical and Cultural Setting

Athens in the first century was a hub of pluralistic religions and philosophies—Stoics, Epicureans, and every imaginable deity honored in marble and bronze. Archaeological digs on the Areopagus and references in Pausanias and Diogenes Laertius confirm multiple altars bearing the dedication “Agnōstō Theō.” Greek piety preferred to cover every divine contingency; an “unknown god” was theological insurance against offending a deity left unnamed.


Paul’s Strategy: Starting Inclusively

Paul respectfully acknowledges the Athenians’ spiritual hunger (“I see that in every way you are very religious,” v. 22). By quoting pagan poets (v. 28) he affirms that fragments of truth exist in general revelation. In behavioral-science terms, Paul lowers psychological reactance, inviting hearers into shared ground without immediate confrontation.


Immediate Shift to Exclusivity

Having secured an audience, Paul reorients the conversation from many gods to One Creator (vv. 24–25). The exclusivity is sharpened by five assertions:

1. God made the world (v. 24) – refuting local patron deities.

2. God is not served by human hands (v. 25) – negating temple economy.

3. God determined the appointed times and boundaries of nations (v. 26) – countering astrological fatalism.

4. God commands all people everywhere to repent (v. 30) – universal mandate, not optional.

5. God will judge the world by the Man He has appointed, proved by the resurrection (v. 31).

Each point dismantles inclusivism. There is one source of life, one moral standard, one Savior, one resurrection-backed proof.


Inclusive in Invitation, Exclusive in Means

Paul’s gospel is inclusive in scope (“all people everywhere,” v. 30) yet exclusive in pathway (“by a Man He has appointed,” v. 31). This balance echoes John 3:16 (“whoever believes”) alongside John 14:6 (“no one comes to the Father except through Me”). Scripture consistently teaches universal accessibility but singular mediation (1 Timothy 2:5).


Old Testament Continuity

Yahweh’s exclusivity permeates the Hebrew Scriptures:

Isaiah 45:5 – “I am the LORD, and there is no other.”

Exodus 20:3 – “You shall have no other gods before Me.”

Paul, a Pharisaic scholar, anchors Acts 17 in this monotheistic tradition, showing Scripture’s coherence across covenants.


Philosophical Coherence

The law of non-contradiction forbids mutually exclusive truth-claims from being simultaneously true. If the resurrection happened (1 Corinthians 15:14), then rival claims denying it cannot be equally valid. Paul appeals to objective history, not subjective preference.


Archaeological and Geological Corroboration of Creation Claims

Paul’s Creator-Lord assertion dovetails with modern design arguments—information-rich DNA, finely tuned cosmic constants, and Cambrian explosion fossils in sedimentary layers that match a catastrophic Flood model. These empirical features converge toward one intelligent Designer, not a pantheon.


Miraculous Validation

Paul stakes the exclusivity of the gospel on the historical resurrection—God “has given assurance to all by raising Him from the dead.” Multiple independent lines—early creedal tradition (1 Corinthians 15:3-7), enemy attestation (Matthew 28:11-15), and transformed eyewitnesses—ground this miracle in verifiable history. No comparable event supports any alternative deity.


Practical Implications for Evangelism

1. Begin where people are; recognize spiritual longing.

2. Transition quickly to the uniqueness of Christ.

3. Emphasize historical resurrection as the decisive proof.

4. Call for repentance—pluralism offers no escape from judgment.

5. Maintain a respectful tone; truth need not be abrasive.


Conclusion

Acts 17:23 simultaneously affirms the inclusivity of God’s concern for every nation and the exclusivity of salvation through the risen Christ. Paul’s proclamation transforms an altar to an undefined god into a platform for the definite, singular truth: the Creator has revealed Himself, commands all to repent, and guarantees judgment and salvation solely through Jesus. Any worldview endorsing equal validity among religions cannot stand alongside this apostolic declaration.

What does Acts 17:23 reveal about Paul's approach to sharing the Gospel with non-believers?
Top of Page
Top of Page